The US Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a Republican challenge to campaign finance rules that could impact next year’s midterm elections.Among those bringing the case is Vice President JD Vance, who joined when he was running for the Senate in 2022 and is now considered a potential candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2028.At issue in the case brought by the Republican Party is limits on the amount of money political parties can spend in coordination with their candidates.In Citizens United, a landmark 2010 case, the Supreme Court lifted restrictions on campaign spending by corporations, unions and other outside groups.But political parties are still restricted, however, on how much they can spend on advertising, for example, in coordination with individual candidates.Supporters of the law argue that it curbs potential corruption and prevents wealthy donors from funneling money through a political party to a candidate of their choice.It was unclear during oral arguments on Tuesday how the court would rule although several of the six conservative justices on the nine-member court appeared inclined to strike down the restrictions.”I am concerned…that the combination of campaign finance laws and this court’s decisions over the years have together reduced the power of political parties as compared to outside groups, with negative effects on our constitutional democracy,” said Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative.”You can give huge money to the outside group, but you can’t give huge money to the parties, and the parties are very much weakened compared to the outside group,” Kavanaugh said.The three liberal justices were skeptical.”Once we take off this coordinated expenditure limits, then what’s left?” said Justice Sonia Sotomayor. “What’s left is nothing, no control whatsoever.”Marc Elias, arguing for Democrats who oppose easing the rules, said lifting the spending restrictions would “convert the political parties into mere paymasters to settle invoices from campaign vendors.””They will not be able to support activity that is long term in nature, because there will be an arms race that right now doesn’t exist,” Elias said.”Coordinated party spending limits act as a buffer on how much money you can pump into directly paying the bills of a House or Senate campaign or a presidential campaign so that you have funds to do these other party building functions,” he added.The court is expected to issue its decision by the end of June, four months ahead of the midterm vote.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday he was ready to hold new elections in Ukraine provided security could be assured, and that he expected to send Washington within a day revised proposals on ending the nearly four-year war with Russia.US President Donald Trump is pressuring Kyiv to accept a deal formulated by Washington, the initial version of which was criticised by Ukraine’s allies as overly favourable to Russia.”We are working today (Tuesday) and will continue tomorrow (Wednesday). I think we will hand it over tomorrow,” Zelensky told reporters after shuttling between European capitals to hammer out a response with allies.Trump, who earlier accused Zelensky of not reading the latest US proposals, said Russia had the “upper hand” in the conflict, in an interview with Politico published on Tuesday.He also accused Kyiv of “using war” to avoid elections, which have been postponed under the imposition of martial law since Russia invaded its neighbour.”You know, they talk about a democracy, but it gets to a point where it’s not a democracy anymore,” Trump said.Ukrainian law prohibits holding elections under martial law, without which a presidential ballot was to have taken place in March 2024.But on Tuesday, following Trump’s comments, Zelensky said he was ready to organise a new ballot.”I am ready for the elections,” Zelensky told journalists, adding that he was asking Ukrainian lawmakers to prepare “proposals regarding the possibility of amending the legislative foundations and the law on elections during martial law”.He said that, for the vote to take place, security had to be assured in the country whose cities come under Russian drone and missile attacks on a daily basis.”I am now asking, I declare this openly, for the United States of America to help me, possibly together with European colleagues, to ensure security for holding elections,” he said.- ‘No legal right’ -Zelensky spent the past few days shuttling between European capitals to hammer out a response to the US plan. On Monday he held talks with European leaders in London and Brussels. On Tuesday, he went to Italy to meet Pope Leo XIV and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.Washington’s proposals involved Ukraine surrendering land that Russia has not captured — the entire industrial Donbas region — in return for security promises that fall short of Kyiv’s aspirations to join NATO.Zelensky on Monday said Washington’s 28-point plan had been revised to 20 points after US-Ukraine talks at the weekend.He said the land issue and international security guarantees were two of the main sticking points.”Do we envision ceding territories? We have no legal right to do so, under Ukrainian law, our constitution and international law. And we don’t have any moral right either,” Zelensky said.”The key is to know what our partners will be ready to do in the event of new aggression by Russia. At the moment, we have not received any answer to this question,” he said.During a televised event on Tuesday, President Vladimir Putin called Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region Russia’s “historical territory”.”This territory is important; it is our historical territory, absolutely,” he said.- Trump criticises Europe -Trump has blown hot and cold on Ukraine since returning to office in January, initially chastising Zelensky for not being grateful for US support.But he was also frustrated that efforts to persuade Putin to end the war had failed to produce results, and he recently slapped new sanctions on Russian oil firms.European allies have expressed solidarity with Ukraine.In the Politico interview, Trump criticised Europe’s role, saying: “They talk but they don’t produce.”Pope Leo XIV said after meeting Zelensky that “The remarks that are made about Europe also in interviews recently, I think, are trying to break apart what I think needs to be a very important alliance today and in the future.”The US pope also warned that “seeking a peace agreement without including Europe in the discussions, let’s say, is unrealistic.””The war is in Europe, and I think that Europe must be part of the guarantees we are seeking for security today and in the future. Unfortunately, not everyone understands this,” he said.