US signals room for negotiation on Ukraine plan ahead of talks

Washington signalled room for negotiation on a US plan to end the Ukraine war that has drawn pushback from Kyiv, its allies and US lawmakers ahead of Sunday talks on the proposal in Switzerland.Trump has given Ukraine until November 27 to approve the plan to end the nearly four-year conflict, but Kyiv is seeking changes to a draft that accepts some of Russia’s hardline demands.Washington insisted Saturday the proposal was official US policy, denying claims by a group of US senators that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told them the document was a Russian “wish list”.The 28-point plan would require the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO. Trump told reporters Saturday it was not his final offer and he hoped to stop the fighting “one way or the other”.Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, speaking on Fox News, described the plan as “a work in progress”.Ukraine’s European allies, who were not included in drafting the proposal, said the plan requires “additional work” as they scrambled at the G20 summit in South Africa to come up with a counter-offer to strengthen Kyiv’s position.A US official told AFP that Rubio and diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff would land in Geneva on Sunday for the talks and that US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll had already arrived after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv.”The peace proposal was authored by the US,” Rubio wrote on social media late Saturday.”It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations. It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”- Russian ‘representatives’ expected -Zelensky has issued a decree naming Ukraine’s delegation for the talks, led by his top aide Andriy Yermak.It also says the negotiations would include “representatives of the Russian Federation” but there was no immediate confirmation from Moscow whether it would join the talks.Zelensky said “consultations will take place with partners regarding the steps needed to end the war”.”Our representatives know how to defend Ukraine’s national interests and what is necessary to prevent Russia from launching a third invasion,” having annexed Crimea in 2014 and mounted a full-scale offensive in 2022, he said.Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the senior officials would meet in Geneva “to take things further forward”, stressing the importance of solid “security guarantees” for Ukraine under any settlement.”The focus very much now is on Geneva tomorrow and whether we can make progress,” he told reporters on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg.Starmer said his national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, would be in Geneva. Italian diplomatic sources said Rome was sending national security advisor Fabrizio Saggio.Security officials from the EU, France and Germany will also attend, French President Emmanuel Macron told a news conference at the G20.- West says plan needs more ‘work’ -Western leaders at the G20 summit said that the US plan was “a basis which will require additional work”.”We are clear on the principle that borders must not be changed by force. We are also concerned by the proposed limitations on Ukraine’s armed forces, which would leave Ukraine vulnerable to future attack,” the leaders of key European countries, Canada and Japan said in a joint statement.Macron said the plan contained points that had to be more broadly discussed as they concerned European allies, such as Ukraine’s NATO ties and Russian frozen assets held in the EU.”We all want peace and we are agreed. We want the peace to be strong and lasting,” he said, insisting a settlement must “take into account the security of all Europeans”.Zelensky said in an address to the nation on Friday that Ukraine faces one of the most challenging moments in its history, adding that he would propose “alternatives” to Trump’s plan.”The pressure on Ukraine is one of the hardest. Ukraine may face a very difficult choice: either the loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner,” Zelensky said, referring to a possible break with Washington.Russian President Vladimir Putin said the blueprint could “lay the foundation” for a final peace settlement, but threatened more land seizures if Ukraine walked away from negotiations.

La France insoumise se met en ordre de bataille pour les municipales

La France insoumise lance officiellement dimanche sa campagne pour les municipales 2026, des élections au cours desquelles l’enjeu pour LFI ne sera pas tant de remporter des villes que d’entrer dans les conseils municipaux, pour cimenter son implantation locale.La formation de Jean-Luc Mélenchon avait enjambé les scrutins municipaux de 2020 et ne dirige donc actuellement qu’une petite poignée de villes, la plus grande étant Faches-Thumesnil, dans la banlieue de Lille (18.000 habitants).Cette fois-ci, “LFI sera présente dans à peu près 500 villes, dont 75% des communes de plus de 30.000 habitants. Soit en tête de liste, soit en soutien à une liste”, indique le coordinateur national du mouvement, Manuel Bompard.Dans les plus grandes villes, ce sont souvent les députés, qui comptent le plus de notoriété dans ce mouvement doté d’un très faible réseau d’élus locaux, qui seront candidats.Sophia Chikirou à Paris, Sébastien Delogu à Marseille, Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi à Lyon, François Piquemal à Toulouse, Nathalie Oziol à Montpellier, Marie Mesmeur à Rennes… Au total une quinzaine de députés ont été ou sont en passe d’être investis par LFI. “Tous les sondages nous mettent à plus de 10% dans les grandes villes”, se réjouit le député Paul Vannier, responsable des élections de la formation mélenchoniste.Les Insoumis comptent en effet s’appuyer sur leurs bons scores dans les banlieues populaires et les grandes métropoles: la direction du mouvement a identifié Roubaix (Nord), La Courneuve (Seine-Saint-Denis) ou encore Evry (Essonne) comme commune où la victoire serait un objectif crédible. Evry, où se présente la députée Farida Amrani, “est même l’une des chances les plus sérieuses de gagner une préfecture pour La France insoumise”, estime Manuel Bompard.Mais LFI a choisi d’opter pour la mesure et ne veut surtout pas crier victoire trop tôt. “Le projet c’est de progresser et d’entrer dans les conseils municipaux, on part de pas grand chose. Gagner deux ou trois mairies serait déjà une très belle performance”, explique Manuel Bompard. Gagner des conseillers municipaux permettrait au mouvement, qui ne compte aucun élu au Sénat, de se positionner pour les prochaines élections sénatoriales, de 2026 et 2029, où ce sont les grands électeurs qui votent.  “Nous sommes une organisation jeune et faiblement implantée. Ce sera difficile de gagner au second tour. Si nous l’emportons dans une ville de plus de 30.000 habitants, je serais très satisfait”, complète Paul Vannier.- “Pas toujours derrière” -Peut-être est-ce le souvenir de la municipale anticipée de Villeneuve Saint-Georges (Val-de-Marne) en début d’année qui appelle les Insoumis à la prudence. Alors que le député Louis Boyard caressait de réels espoirs de victoire dans cette ville de sa circonscription, à la sociologie jeune et très populaire, il avait largement perdu au second tour avec 39% des voix, face à une droite divisée.Faute notamment d’avoir pu rallier le reste de la gauche derrière lui. Et cette fois-ci encore, dans la grande majorité des cas, les Insoumis présenteront leurs propres listes, sans s’unir avec les Ecologistes, le Parti socialiste ou le Parti communiste. Au risque d’affaiblir la gauche et d’offrir des villes à la droite, comme à Paris, dénoncent les socialistes.”Il ne faut pas qu’un socialiste soit maire de Paris”, a ainsi lancé ce week-end Sophia Chikirou, dans une flèche contre le candidat PS dans la capitale, Emmanuel Grégoire.”Je veux bien travailler aux conditions de l’union, mais les conditions de l’union, ça peut pas être toujours les Insoumis derrière”, insiste Manuel Bompard.Dans beaucoup de municipalités, les tensions à gauche laissent présager d’âpres négociations de second tour, où le score nécessaire pour se maintenir est de 10% et celui pour fusionner avec une autre liste est de 5%. “Rien ne sera possible sans nous”, prévient Paul Vannier.  

La France insoumise se met en ordre de bataille pour les municipales

La France insoumise lance officiellement dimanche sa campagne pour les municipales 2026, des élections au cours desquelles l’enjeu pour LFI ne sera pas tant de remporter des villes que d’entrer dans les conseils municipaux, pour cimenter son implantation locale.La formation de Jean-Luc Mélenchon avait enjambé les scrutins municipaux de 2020 et ne dirige donc actuellement qu’une petite poignée de villes, la plus grande étant Faches-Thumesnil, dans la banlieue de Lille (18.000 habitants).Cette fois-ci, “LFI sera présente dans à peu près 500 villes, dont 75% des communes de plus de 30.000 habitants. Soit en tête de liste, soit en soutien à une liste”, indique le coordinateur national du mouvement, Manuel Bompard.Dans les plus grandes villes, ce sont souvent les députés, qui comptent le plus de notoriété dans ce mouvement doté d’un très faible réseau d’élus locaux, qui seront candidats.Sophia Chikirou à Paris, Sébastien Delogu à Marseille, Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi à Lyon, François Piquemal à Toulouse, Nathalie Oziol à Montpellier, Marie Mesmeur à Rennes… Au total une quinzaine de députés ont été ou sont en passe d’être investis par LFI. “Tous les sondages nous mettent à plus de 10% dans les grandes villes”, se réjouit le député Paul Vannier, responsable des élections de la formation mélenchoniste.Les Insoumis comptent en effet s’appuyer sur leurs bons scores dans les banlieues populaires et les grandes métropoles: la direction du mouvement a identifié Roubaix (Nord), La Courneuve (Seine-Saint-Denis) ou encore Evry (Essonne) comme commune où la victoire serait un objectif crédible. Evry, où se présente la députée Farida Amrani, “est même l’une des chances les plus sérieuses de gagner une préfecture pour La France insoumise”, estime Manuel Bompard.Mais LFI a choisi d’opter pour la mesure et ne veut surtout pas crier victoire trop tôt. “Le projet c’est de progresser et d’entrer dans les conseils municipaux, on part de pas grand chose. Gagner deux ou trois mairies serait déjà une très belle performance”, explique Manuel Bompard. Gagner des conseillers municipaux permettrait au mouvement, qui ne compte aucun élu au Sénat, de se positionner pour les prochaines élections sénatoriales, de 2026 et 2029, où ce sont les grands électeurs qui votent.  “Nous sommes une organisation jeune et faiblement implantée. Ce sera difficile de gagner au second tour. Si nous l’emportons dans une ville de plus de 30.000 habitants, je serais très satisfait”, complète Paul Vannier.- “Pas toujours derrière” -Peut-être est-ce le souvenir de la municipale anticipée de Villeneuve Saint-Georges (Val-de-Marne) en début d’année qui appelle les Insoumis à la prudence. Alors que le député Louis Boyard caressait de réels espoirs de victoire dans cette ville de sa circonscription, à la sociologie jeune et très populaire, il avait largement perdu au second tour avec 39% des voix, face à une droite divisée.Faute notamment d’avoir pu rallier le reste de la gauche derrière lui. Et cette fois-ci encore, dans la grande majorité des cas, les Insoumis présenteront leurs propres listes, sans s’unir avec les Ecologistes, le Parti socialiste ou le Parti communiste. Au risque d’affaiblir la gauche et d’offrir des villes à la droite, comme à Paris, dénoncent les socialistes.”Il ne faut pas qu’un socialiste soit maire de Paris”, a ainsi lancé ce week-end Sophia Chikirou, dans une flèche contre le candidat PS dans la capitale, Emmanuel Grégoire.”Je veux bien travailler aux conditions de l’union, mais les conditions de l’union, ça peut pas être toujours les Insoumis derrière”, insiste Manuel Bompard.Dans beaucoup de municipalités, les tensions à gauche laissent présager d’âpres négociations de second tour, où le score nécessaire pour se maintenir est de 10% et celui pour fusionner avec une autre liste est de 5%. “Rien ne sera possible sans nous”, prévient Paul Vannier.  

Muthusamy anchors South Africa to 316-6 in second India Test

Senuran Muthusamy’s gritty half-century anchored South Africa to 316-6 at the first break on day two of the second Test against India on Sunday.South Africa resumed on 247-6 and overnight batters Muthusamy, on 56, and Kyle Verreynne, on 38 were still there at the end of the first session in Guwahati having extended their unbroken seventh-wicket partnership to 70.Play in the north-eastern city is starting 30 minutes earlier than usual because of early sunsets, with the order of the session breaks reversed, meaning the shorter tea break comes before lunch.The tourists, who won the toss and elected to bat on Saturday, are in hunt for their first series victory in India in 25 years after they won the opener of the two-match series.Verreynne hit a boundary to raise South Africa’s 300 before the left-handed Muthusamy reached his fifty with a single off Ravindra Jadeja and looked in control.It was the first fifty of this innings after Tristan Stubbs fell on 49 and skipper Temba Bavuma made 41 as the pair put on 84 for the third wicket on day one.Muthusamy and Verreynne used their feet to tackle spinners in a sedate first hour of play when only 28 runs were scored, including two fours.Muthusamy had a reprieve on 48 when left-arm spinner Jadeja had him given out lbw but the batsman’s review showed the a muurmur when the ball passed his glove and the decision was overturned.

Vietnam flood death toll rises to 90

The death toll from major flooding in Vietnam has risen to 90, with 12 people still missing, the environment ministry said Sunday, after days of heavy rain and landslides.Relentless rain has lashed south-central Vietnam since late October and popular holiday destinations have been hit by several rounds of flooding.Whole sections of coastal Nha Trang city were inundated last week, while deadly landslides struck highland passes around the Da Lat tourist hub.In the hard-hit mountainous province of Dak Lak, 61-year-old farmer Mach Van Si said the floodwaters left him and his wife stranded on their sheet-metal rooftop for two nights.”Our neighborhood was completely destroyed. Nothing was left. Everything was covered in mud,” he told AFP on Sunday.By the time they climbed a ladder to their roof, Si said he was no longer scared.”I just thought we were going to die because there was no way out,” he said.More than 60 deaths recorded since November 16 were in Dak Lak, where tens of thousands of homes were inundated, the environment ministry said in a statement.Four communes in Dak Lak were still flooded on Sunday, the ministry said.More than 80,000 hectares of rice and other crops across Dak Lak and four other provinces were damaged in the last week, with over 3.2 million livestock or poultry dead or washed away by floodwaters.Authorities have used helicopters to airdrop aid to communities cut off by flooding and landslides, with the government deploying tens of thousands of personnel to deliver clothing, water-purification tablets, instant noodles and other supplies to affected areas, state outlet Tuoi Tre News said.Severe flooding in southern coastal Khanh Hoa province washed away two suspension bridges last week, leaving many households isolated, the outlet said, citing officials.Several locations on national highways remained blocked on Sunday due to flooding or landslides, according to the environment ministry, and some railway sections were still suspended.More than 129,000 customers remained without electricity, after more than a million were without power last week.The environment ministry on Sunday estimated economic losses of $343 million across five provinces due to the floods.Natural disasters have left 279 people dead or missing in Vietnam and caused more than $2 billion in damage between January and October, according to the national statistics office.The Southeast Asian nation is prone to heavy rain between June and September, but scientists have identified a pattern of human-driven climate change making extreme weather more frequent and destructive.

US denies pushing Russian ‘wish list’ as Ukraine plan

Washington insisted Saturday that its Ukraine proposal is indeed official US policy, denying claims by a group of senators that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told them the document under discussion is just a Russian “wish list.”The dispute over the 28-point plan — which cedes Ukrainian territory long sought by Moscow — threw an extraordinary element of confusion into efforts to negotiate an end to the war. US President Donald Trump has pushed the plan, pressuring the Ukrainians to accept it within days. Negotiators will meet in Switzerland on Sunday.However, after a storm of criticism that the proposal is almost entirely favorable to Moscow, several US senators spoke out, holding a press conference at the Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, Canada on Saturday. The senators — Republican Mike Rounds, independent Angus King, and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen — said Rubio told them the current Ukraine proposal is not the official US position, but instead lays out a “Russian wish list.””What he (Rubio) told us was that this was not the American proposal. This was a proposal that was received by someone… representing Russia in this proposal. It was given to Mr Witkoff,” Rounds said, referring to Trump’s diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff.”It is not our recommendation. It is not our peace plan.”King corroborated those comments, saying “the leaked 28-point plan — which according to Secretary Rubio is not the administration’s position — it is essentially the wish list of the Russians that is now being presented to the Europeans and to the Ukrainians.”The plan would require Kyiv to cede territory, cut its military, and pledge never to join NATO.Trump said Saturday it was not his final offer and he hoped to stop the fighting “one way or the other.” – ‘Authored by the US’ – Rubio asserted the proposal “was authored by the US.””It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations. It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine,” he said Saturday. But Shaheen said she and Rounds spoke to the top US diplomat while he was en route to Geneva for the latest negotiations with Ukrainian officials.Rounds said Rubio was “very frank” during their call.”It doesn’t look like normally something that would come out of our government, particularly the way it was written. It looked more like it was written in Russian to begin with,” Rounds said.King noted that the plan should not reward Moscow for its invasion. “Everyone wants this war to end but we want it to end on a fair and just peace that respects the integrity and the sovereignty of Ukraine and does not reward aggression and also provides adequate security guarantees,” he said. Earlier Saturday, other US senators including some in Trump’s Republican party criticized Washington’s plan. “We will not achieve that lasting peace by offering (Russian President Vladimir) Putin concession after concession and fatally degrading Ukraine’s ability to defend itself,” the group of senators wrote in a statement.Senator Mitch McConnell, a veteran Republican, said “rewarding Russian butchery would be disastrous to America’s interests.” Writing on X, he said that Putin has “spent the entire year trying to play President Trump for a fool.”Since the Russian invasion began in 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has vowed to keep Kyiv’s territory intact. In a Friday address to the nation, Zelensky said Ukraine faces one of the most challenging moments in its history, adding that he would propose “alternatives” to Trump’s proposal.

Trump signals room for negotiation on Ukraine plan ahead of talks

President Donald Trump signalled room for negotiation on a US plan to end the Ukraine war that has drawn pushback from Kyiv, its allies and US lawmakers ahead of Sunday talks on the proposal in Switzerland.Trump has given Ukraine until November 27 to approve the plan to end the nearly four-year conflict, but Kyiv is seeking changes to a draft that accepts some of Russia’s hardline demands.Washington insisted on Saturday the proposal was official US policy, denying claims by a group of US senators that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told them the document was a Russian “wish list”.The 28-point plan would require the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO. Trump told reporters Saturday it was not his final offer and he hoped to stop the fighting “one way or the other”.Ukraine’s European allies, who were not included in drafting the proposal, said the plan requires “additional work” as they scrambled at the G20 summit in South Africa to come up with a counter-offer to strengthen Kyiv’s position.A US official told AFP that Rubio and diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff would land in Geneva on Sunday for the talks and that US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll had already arrived after meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv.”The peace proposal was authored by the US,” Rubio wrote on social media late Saturday.”It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations. It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”- Russian ‘representatives’ expected -Zelensky has issued a decree naming Ukraine’s delegation for the talks, led by his top aide Andriy Yermak.It also says the negotiations would include “representatives of the Russian Federation” but there was no immediate confirmation from Moscow whether it would join the talks.Zelensky said “consultations will take place with partners regarding the steps needed to end the war”.”Our representatives know how to defend Ukraine’s national interests and what is necessary to prevent Russia from launching a third invasion,” having annexed Crimea in 2014 and mounted a full-scale offensive in 2022, he said.Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the senior officials would meet in Geneva “to take things further forward”, stressing the importance of solid “security guarantees” for Ukraine under any settlement.”The focus very much now is on Geneva tomorrow and whether we can make progress tomorrow morning,” he told reporters on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg.Starmer said his national security adviser Jonathan Powell would be in Geneva. Italian diplomatic sources said Rome was sending national security advisor Fabrizio Saggio.Security officials from the EU, France and Germany will also attend, French President Emmanuel Macron told a news conference at the G20.- West says plan needs more ‘work’ -Western leaders at the G20 summit said that the US plan was “a basis which will require additional work”.”We are clear on the principle that borders must not be changed by force. We are also concerned by the proposed limitations on Ukraine’s armed forces, which would leave Ukraine vulnerable to future attack,” the leaders of key European countries, Canada and Japan said in a joint statement.Macron said the plan contained points that had to be more broadly discussed as they concerned European allies, such as Ukraine’s NATO ties and Russian frozen assets held in the EU.”We all want peace and we are agreed. We want the peace to be strong and lasting,” he said, insisting a settlement must “take into account the security of all Europeans”.The European delegates in Geneva will aim “to put substance into the discussions and to reconcile all viewpoints”, he added.Zelensky said in an address to the nation on Friday that Ukraine faces one of the most challenging moments in its history, adding that he would propose “alternatives” to Trump’s plan.”The pressure on Ukraine is one of the hardest. Ukraine may face a very difficult choice: either the loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner,” Zelensky said, referring to a possible break with Washington.Russian President Vladimir Putin said the blueprint could “lay the foundation” for a final peace settlement, but threatened more land seizures if Ukraine walked away from negotiations.