He is perhaps the most powerful man in Washington at the moment, after Donald Trump. Russell Vought, the right-wing ideologue who heads the Office of Management and Budget, is using the US government shutdown to deliver his brand of shock therapy to American bureaucracy.Shutdowns usually result in hundreds of thousands of federal workers being placed on temporary unpaid leave. But this time, the White House has said mass firings are “imminent.”Trump has tapped Vought to tell him “which of the many Democrat Agencies… he recommends to be cut.” He even posted on his Truth Social platform an AI-generated video depicting the budget chief as the grim reaper walking through Washington, scythe in hand.Vought is following a far right governance blueprint, Project 2025, which he helped author.During his reelection campaign, Trump distanced himself from the ultra-conservative policy plan, which envisions vastly expanded executive control over sharply reduced federal government.Now Trump is referring to the 49-year-old Vought as “he of PROJECT 2025 Fame.” Lawmaker Rosa DeLauro, the ranking Democrat on the committee that allocates government money to federal agencies, accuses Vought of having “engineered” the shutdown. “He has been scheming, hoping and planning for this since he was last in office, building his plan to dismantle essential government functions with no regard for the working class, the middle class, and vulnerable Americans who depend on them,” she said on Wednesday, day one of the shutdown. Shutdowns are brought about by lawmakers’ failure to pass an annual budget bill that funds the government. – ‘Dismantle the bureaucracy’ -Born in the northeastern state of Connecticut, Vought graduated from a small evangelical Christian college before earning a law degree and becoming a staffer for Republican lawmakers, then a lobbyist for the conservative Heritage Foundation. He joined the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and became its director during Trump’s first term.  Vought spent president Joe Biden’s term in office planning for a fresh conservative takeover over of government from his own think tank, the Center for Renewing America. The goal: instituting efficiency in what he saw as a bloated government. Trump “has to move executively as fast and as aggressively as possible, with a radical constitutional perspective, to be able to dismantle that bureaucracy,” he told conservative political commentator Tucker Carlson after Trump’s reelection in November 2024.In September, he called the US government “the woke and weaponized administrative state” of civil servants who resist the directives of an elected president.- ‘Trauma’  -Vought was swiftly confirmed by the Senate for a second stint as OMB director in February 2025. But it was tech tycoon Elon Musk who wielded the cost-cutting chainsaw in the early months of the Trump administration.That reportedly irritated Vought, who disagreed with parts of Musk’s approach, sources told The New York Times.But the OMB director was on board for the abrupt dismantling of government agencies.”Yes, I called for trauma within bureaucracies. Bureaucracies hate the American people,” he said in November. “It’s quite simple: all executive power must be vested in the executive branch,” he declared.Burying foreign aid, ending federal funding for public broadcasting and rolling back dozens and dozens of regulations: “It’s exciting to be involved in this,” Vought recently said.

Finally, something to unite President Donald Trump, his Democratic opponents and the Canadians he’s threatening to annex: a ferociously hungry carp.Invasive carp, sometimes called Asian carp, were introduced in the United States in the 1970s. And they’ve never stopped spreading — and eating everything in their path — since.”They’re eating machines,” said Trisiah Tugade, an aquatic biologist with Canada’s Invasive Carp Program, as she and her team glided along the Grand River — a Lake Erie tributary — looking for fish that specialists fear will devastate the Great Lakes. Because they can eat up 40 percent of their bodyweight daily, invasive carps were initially seen as a tool to control nuisance algae in confined areas, like aquaculture ponds. But they escaped, likely during floods, and made their way north, including through the Illinois River. That has raised the specter of the devastating eater establishing itself in the Great Lakes, the world’s largest freshwater system by surface area. “There is nothing that I have seen that scares ecologists more than looking at what the impacts would potentially be if the species of Asian carp that are in the Illinois River get into the Great Lakes and form a breeding population,” University of Michigan Great Lakes water policy expert Mike Shriberg told AFP. It’s a threat that has got the attention of Trump, who calls the fish “a threat” and specialists on both sides of the border.- Shock treatment -Each year, Canadian experts search for carp in Great Lakes tributaries considered favorable for spawning and feeding — often grassy areas with warmer, shallow water. In the Grand River, Tugade and senior biologist Alex Price oversaw an electrofishing mission.The team lowered two roads into the water that released non-lethal pulsating charges, stunning the fish and allowing them to be brought with nets into a tank onboard. Fish were identified, measured and — if not deemed invasive — released into the muddy water. Since the program’s launch in 2012, only a few dozen invasive carp have been captured in Canadian waters.James Hall, whose Hall’emin Sport Fishing business takes clients out on Lake Erie, told AFP he was one of the first to catch one. “I was wondering what it was, but I knew it was something different,” he said, describing the moment he pulled a carp out of the water a decade ago. Hall said he put the fish on ice and called government’s carp hotline.Invasive carp “have been very rare to catch, which is great,” said Price, while insisting vigilance was essential given the gravity of the threat. “They can breed multiple times a year and produce hundreds of thousands of eggs in a single event,” he told AFP. “Within the first year of life, they can be too big for our natural predators to eat,” he added. – Blown apart? -Shriberg described the Great Lakes as “the great uniters” across US political parties and between Canada and the United States. Defending them against invasive species has been a bipartisan priority in states on their shores, several of which have historically been US electoral swing states — like Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — he said. Trump’s May White House memo confirming his support for efforts against “the economic and ecological threat of invasive carp,” drew cross-party praise.   “We’re in the most politically contentious times that I’ve seen in my lifetime,” Shriberg said, calling Trump’s “quiet” memo an affirmation of the rare bipartisan nature of Great Lakes policy. But that path forward is uncertain. Trump’s trade war and annexation threats have strained US-Canada relations. Earlier this year the president reportedly told former prime minister Justin Trudeau that he wanted to revise treaties governing the Great Lakes.Shriberg noted cooperative management of the waterway has defined US-Canada relations, but said “the Trump administration’s hostility towards Canada … threatens to blow that apart.” If the battle against invasive carp were to fail, the consequences would be both dire and unpredictable, he added. “It would cause dramatic changes in the ecological balance of the water,” Shriberg said.And if they ever became established in the Great Lakes, “I don’t believe that you’d have any chance of actually eliminating the population,” he said.