From a total Washington novice, Silicon Valley investor David Sacks has against expectations emerged as one of the most successful members of the second Trump administration.He is officially chair of President Donald Trump’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. However, in the White House he is referred to as the AI and crypto tsar, there to guide the president through the technology revolutions in which the United States play a central role.”I am grateful we have him,” OpenAI boss Sam Altman said in a post on X.”While Americans bicker, our rivals are studying David’s every move,” billionaire Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff chimed in.Those supportive posts responded to a New York Times investigation highlighting Sacks’s investments in technology companies benefiting from White House AI support.Sacks dismissed the report as an “anti-truth” hit job by liberal media.But the episode confirmed that this South African-born outsider has become a force in Trump’s Washington, outlasting his friend Elon Musk, whose White House career ended in acrimony after less than six months.”Even among Silicon Valley allies, he has outperformed expectations,” said a former close associate, speaking anonymously to discuss the matter candidly.- ‘Mafia’ member -Unlike many Silicon Valley figures, the South African-born Sacks has been staunchly conservative since his Stanford University days in the 1990s.There he met Peter Thiel, the self-styled philosopher king of the right-wing tech community.In the early 1990s, the two men wrote for a campus publication, attacking what they saw as political correctness destroying American higher education.After earning degrees from Stanford and the University of Chicago, Sacks initially took a conventional path as a management consultant at McKinsey & Company.But Thiel lured his friend to his startup Confinity, which would eventually become PayPal, the legendary breeding ground for the “PayPal mafia” — a group of entrepreneurs including Musk and LinkedIn billionaire Reid Hoffman — whose influence now extends throughout the tech world.After PayPal, Sacks founded a social media company, sold it to Microsoft, then made his fortune in venture capital.A major turning point came during the COVID pandemic when Sacks and some right-wing friends launched the All-In podcast as a way to pass time, talk business and vent about Democrats in government.The podcast rapidly gained influence, and the brand has since expanded to include major conferences and even a tequila line.Sacks began his way to Trump’s inner circle through campaign contributions ahead of last year’s presidential election.With Musk’s blessing, he was appointed as pointman for AI and cryptocurrency policy.Before diving into AI, Sacks shepherded an ambitious cryptocurrency bill providing legal clarity for digital assets.It’s a sector Trump has enthusiastically embraced, with his family now heavily invested in crypto companies and the president himself issuing a meme coin — activity that critics say amounts to an open door for potential corruption.But AI has become the central focus of Trump’s second presidency with Sacks there to steer Trump toward industry-friendly policies.However, Sacks faces mounting criticism for potential overreach.According to his former associate, Sacks pursues his objectives with an obsessiveness that serves him well in Silicon Valley’s company-building culture. But that same intensity can create friction in Washington.The main controversy centers on his push to prevent individual states from creating their own AI regulations. His vision calls for AI rules to originate exclusively from Washington.When Congress twice failed to ban state regulations, Sacks took his case directly to the president, who signed an executive order threatening to cut federal funding to states passing AI laws.- ‘Out of control’ -Tech lobbyists worry that by going solo, Sacks torpedoed any chance of effective national regulation.More troubling for Sacks is the growing public opposition to AI’s rapid deployment. Concerns about job losses, proliferating data centers, and rising electricity costs may become a major issue in the 2026 midterm elections.”The tech bros are out of control,” warned Steve Bannon, the right-wing Trump movement’s strategic mastermind, worried about political fallout.Rather than seeking common ground, Sacks calls criticism “a red herring” from AI doomers “who want all progress to stop.”

The European Union and some member states reacted sharply Wednesday to US sanctions imposed on five European figures involved in regulating tech companies, including former European commissioner Thierry Breton.They were responding after the US state department announced Tuesday it would deny visas to the five, accusing them of seeking to “coerce” American social media platforms into censoring viewpoints they oppose.France, Germany and Spain also condemned the news from Washington.A statement from the Commission said: “We have requested clarifications from the US authorities and remain engaged. If needed, we will respond swiftly and decisively to defend our regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures.”Our digital rules ensure a safe, fair, and level playing field for all companies, applied fairly and without discrimination.” Breton, the former top tech regulator at the European Commission, often clashed with tycoons including Elon Musk over their obligations to follow EU rules.The state department has described him as the “mastermind” of the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which imposes content moderation and other standards on major social media platforms operating in Europe.The DSA stipulates that major platforms must explain content-moderation decisions, provide transparency for users and ensure researchers can carry out essential work, such as understanding how much children are exposed to dangerous content.But the act has become a bitter rallying point for US conservatives who see it as a weapon of censorship against right-wing thought in Europe and beyond, an accusation the EU furiously denies.”The Trump Administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a post on X Tuesday.- ‘Intimidation and coercion’ -French President Emmanuel Macron said on X: “France condemns the visa restriction measures taken by the United States against Thierry Breton and four other European figures.””These measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty,” he added, saying Europe would defend its “regulatory autonomy”.German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul wrote in a post on X Wednesday: “The DSA was democratically adopted by the EU for the EU –- it does not have extraterritorial effect.The visa bans, he added, “are not acceptable”.Spain’s foreign ministry also condemned the US measures, saying in a statement: “A safe digital space, free from illegal content and disinformation, is a fundamental value for democracy in Europe and a responsibility for everyone.” Breton himself described the latest measures as a political “witch hunt” in a post on X: “To our American friends: ‘Censorship isn’t where you think it is’.”Breton left the commission in 2024 and Stephane Sejourne, his successor in charge of the EU’s internal market, said on X that “no sanction will silence the sovereignty of the European peoples”.The visa ban also targeted Imran Ahmed of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit that fights online misinformation; and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon of HateAid, a German organisation that the state department said functions as a trusted flagger for enforcing the DSA.Clare Melford, who leads the UK-based Global Disinformation Index (GDI), was also on the list.A statement from HateAid called the US government decision an “act of repression by an administration that increasingly disregards the rule of law and tries to silence its critics with all its might”.A GDI spokesperson said the measures were “an egregious act of government censorship” as well as “immoral, unlawful, and un-American”. 

Four United Nations rights experts on Wednesday condemned the US partial naval blockade of Venezuela, determining it illegal armed aggression and calling on the US Congress to intervene.The United States has deployed a major military force in the Caribbean and has recently intercepted oil tankers as part of a naval blockade against Venezuelan vessels it considers to be under sanctions.”There is no right to enforce unilateral sanctions through an armed blockade,” the UN experts said in a joint statement.A blockade is a prohibited use of military force against another country under the UN Charter, they added.”It is such a serious use of force that it is also expressly recognised as illegal armed aggression under the General Assembly’s 1974 Definition of Aggression,” they said.”As such, it is an armed attack under article 51 of the Charter — in principle giving the victim state a right of self-defence.”US President Donald Trump accuses Venezuela of using oil, the South American country’s main resource, to finance “narcoterrorism, human trafficking, murders, and kidnappings”.Caracas denies any involvement in drug trafficking. It says Washington is seeking to overthrow its president, Nicolas Maduro, in order to seize Venezuelan oil reserves, the largest in the world.Since September, US forces have launched dozens of air strikes on boats that Washington alleges, without showing evidence, were transporting drugs. More than 100 people have been killed.- Congress should ‘intervene’ -“These killings amount to violations of the right to life. They must be investigated and those responsible held accountable,” said the experts.”Meanwhile, the US Congress should intervene to prevent further attacks and lift the blockade,” they added.They called on countries to take measures to stop the blockade and illegal killings, and bring perpetrators justice.The four who signed the joint statement are: Ben Saul, special rapporteur on protecting human rights while countering terrorism; George Katrougalos, the expert on promoting a democratic and equitable international order; development expert Surya Deva; and Gina Romero, who covers the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.UN experts are independent figures mandated by the UN Human Rights Council to report their findings. They do not, therefore, speak for the United Nations itself.On Tuesday at the UN in New York, Venezuela, having requested an emergency meeting of the Security Council, accused Washington of “the greatest extortion known in our history”.