White S. Africans clamour for US resettlement after Trump orderMon, 10 Feb 2025 17:24:43 GMT

A deluge of more than 20,000 queries crashed the email server of the South African Chamber of Commerce in the United States after President Donald Trump said he would prioritise white South Africans in a refugee programme, the chamber said Monday.Trump and Pretoria are locked in a diplomatic row over a land expropriation act that …

White S. Africans clamour for US resettlement after Trump orderMon, 10 Feb 2025 17:24:43 GMT Read More »

Kanye West’s account on X goes dark after hate-filled rant

Kanye West’s account on X has been deactivated after a days-long rant on the platform that included vitriolic, anti-Semitic outbursts.It was not immediately clear if the artist and entrepreneur, who legally changed his name to Ye, deactivated the account himself or if X took it down.”I’m logging out of Twitter. I appreciate Elon for allowing me to vent. It has been very cathartic to use the world as a sounding board,” he wrote in his final post, referring to the owner of X, Elon Musk.It’s a familiar pattern for Ye, 47, who is now in the headlines as often for his provocative, often hate-filled rants as he is for his music.The rapper has been locked out of social media platforms in the past, notably when he was banned from X for nearly eight months for violating rules barring incitement to violence.Ye’s most recent missives included comments in support of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, who is imprisoned on sex trafficking charges. He repeatedly referred to himself as a “Nazi.”He also referred to the stunt he pulled at the Grammys last week with wife Bianca Censori, who appeared virtually nude on the red carpet ahead of the awards gala.X did not immediately respond to a request for comment.For years, Ye has spoken openly about struggles with bipolar disorder. He recently said on “The Download” podcast that he in fact has an autism diagnosis.

US federal workers weigh Trump buyout as court to step in

US federal workers face another deadline Monday to accept a mass buyout from their government jobs as a judge holds a key hearing on whether the offer is legal.The proposal to two million federal workers is part of an effort by President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk to drastically cut back on spending that they say will transform the government.In his first three weeks in office, the president has unleashed a flurry of executive orders aimed at slashing federal spending, appointing SpaceX and Tesla CEO Musk to lead the efforts under the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).Trump’s sweeping plans have now opened legal battles on several fronts, with lawsuits filed across the country aimed at stopping the Trump initiatives that critics say amount to an illegal power grab.The Democrats are trying to build momentum against the Trump onslaught on government, and on Monday announced a new portal for whistleblowers to report potential law-breaking by Musk and his associates.The legal battles intensified Saturday when a US judge blocked Musk’s team from accessing Treasury Department data on millions of Americans.The Trump administration has appealed, calling the order “impermissible” and “unconstitutional.”Musk’s team has moved aggressively through federal agencies, freezing aid programs and pushing workforce reductions through legally unclear buyouts or threats of termination.The Trump administration has effectively shuttered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency long criticized by Republicans as overreaching.Questions are rife over the buyout, including whether Trump has the legal right to make the offer and whether his administration will honor it.The plan was first announced on January 28 in an email to much of the vast federal government and titled “Fork in the road” — the same phrasing as the note Musk sent to employees at Twitter when he bought the social media platform in 2022 and renamed it X.The original deadline was Thursday, but unions representing more than 800,000 civil servants filed a lawsuit against the offer.Federal Judge George O’Toole last week said he accepted the case and will hold a first hearing in a Boston courtroom at 2:00 pm (1900 GMT) Monday.In response, the US Office of Personnel Management, which is run by Musk associates, extended the decision deadline until 11:59 pm.- ‘Not canceled’ -In a post on X, OPM maintain that the program was “NOT blocked or canceled” and the White House urged workers to keep considering “this very generous, once-in-a-lifetime offer.”Last week, US media reported that at least 65,000 federal workers had opted into the so-called deferred resignation program.This represents some three percent of the roughly two million federal employees who received the offer. The White House has said its target is for between five and 10 percent of employees.Unions warn that without Congress signing off on the use of federally budgeted money, the agreements may be worthless, especially since current government spending is only agreed until mid-March.”OPM’s Fork Directive is a sweeping and stunningly arbitrary action to solicit blanket resignations of federal workers,” wrote lawyers for the unions.”Defendants have not even argued — nor could they — that the Fork Directive was the product of rational or considered decision-making.”

Global stocks markets brush off Trump tariffs

Global stock markets rose on Monday, as traders appeared to shrug off US President Donald Trump’s latest tariffs announcement surrounding levies on steel and aluminium. This was in contrast to a week ago when tariff announcements from Trump sent global equities tumbling.The fact that stock markets are up this time around “could be a sign of tariff fatigue”, said Kathleen Brooks, research director at trading group XTB. Trump warned over the weekend that every country would face unspecified “reciprocal” levies. Regarding steel and aluminium, the United States will move to impose tariffs as early as this week, Trump said.Canada is the largest source of steel and aluminium imports to the United States, according to US trade data. Brazil, Mexico and South Korea are also major steel providers to the country.The dollar rose against the Canadian dollar, Mexican peso and South Korean won on Monday.It also rose against the euro, pound and yen.The European Union said it had not received any official notification of extra tariffs from the United States while Britain said it had not seen “any detailed proposals” but was “ready for all situations”.In equities trading, both London and Frankfurt set fresh records.Hong Kong and Shanghai stocks rose on Monday, even as hopes of a delay to Trump’s tariffs against China were dashed.Chinese tech firms extended gains, buoyed by the success of AI startup DeepSeek. Investor sentiment was boosted by a “mixture of trade restrictions not being as bad as they might have been and hope for further Chinese stimulus”, said Derren Nathan, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.Tokyo was flat, despite Trump’s threats to target Japanese goods should the US trade deficit with the country fail to equalise.Wall Street’s main indices moved higher on Monday.Losses of more than one percent on Friday “presumably triggered the buy-the-dip crowd that is driving the action this morning”, said Briefing.com analyst Patrick O’Hare.”There seems to be a healthy allowance, too, for the expectation that the stock market will quickly bounce back from last week’s losses like it always has on its bull market jaunt to record highs,” he added.Wall Street dropped on Friday after official data showed US consumers increasingly worried about inflation and in reaction to news that fewer American jobs than expected had been created last month.But the readings did little to alter traders’ view that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates two times at best this year.In company news on Monday, BP shares surged more than seven percent in London, following reports that a prominent activist fund had built a significant stake, aiming to turn around the struggling oil and gas major.In Tokyo, Nippon Steel briefly fell more than two percent, following a Trump announcement that the Japanese giant would make a major investment in US Steel, but will no longer attempt to take it over.US Steel shares dived 5.8 percent in New York on Friday, but rebounded around four percent on Monday.Gold also set yet another record, rising above $2,900 per ounce for the first time.”Tariff fears and inflation worries continue to burnish the safe-haven” interest in gold, said Chris Beauchamp, Chief Market Analyst at online trading platform IG.- Key figures around 1630 GMT -New York – Dow: UP 0.2 percent at 44,373.57 points New York – S&P 500: UP 0.6 percent at 6,061.52New York – Nasdaq: UP 1.1 percent at 19,739.14London – FTSE 100: UP 0.8 percent at 8,767.80 (close)Paris – CAC 40: UP 0.4 percent at 8,006.22 (close)Frankfurt – DAX: UP 0.6 percent at 21,911.74 (close)Tokyo – Nikkei 225: FLAT at 38,801.17 (close)Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: UP 1.8 percent to 21,521.98 (close)Shanghai – Composite: UP 0.6 percent to 3,322.17 (close)Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0314 from $1.0328 on FridayPound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2388 from $1.2405Dollar/yen: UP at 151.65 yen from 151.43 yenEuro/pound: UP at 83.28 from 83.24 penceBrent North Sea Crude: UP 1.4 percent at $75.67 per barrelWest Texas Intermediate: UP 1.6 percent at $72.12 per barrelburs-rl/bc

Les Bourses européennes finissent dans le vert

Les marchés boursiers européens ont terminé en hausse lundi, profitant d’une dynamique d’achat qui résiste aux nouvelles déclarations de Donald Trump sur de potentiels droits de douane supplémentaires aux Etats-Unis.Paris a pris 0,42%, Londres 0,77% et Milan 0,50%. Francfort a pris 0,57%, après avoir atteint un nouveau record en séance à 21.945,57 points.

Climat: le monde est entré dans une période de réchauffement de plus de 1,5°C à long terme, selon des scientifiques

La planète a déjà connu, en 2024, une année au-dessus de 1,5°C de réchauffement. Mais ce seuil fixé par l’accord de Paris va-t-il pour autant être franchi durablement? C’est probable car les températures récentes s’inscrivent dans une tendance de long terme, selon deux études publiées lundi.Des chercheurs suggèrent ainsi, dans des articles publiés simultanément dans la revue Nature climate change, que nous pourrions être entrés dans une période de plusieurs décennies au-dessus de 1,5°C.2024 a été la première année calendaire au-dessus de ce niveau de réchauffement, avec une température moyenne à la surface de la planète supérieure de 1,55°C à la moyenne de la période 1850-1900, selon une analyse de l’Organisation météorologique mondiale (OMM), se basant sur six grandes bases de données internationales.Avant cela, une série de douze mois consécutifs au-dessus de ce seuil avait déjà été constatée dès juin 2024 par l’observatoire européen Copernicus.”Une seule année à plus de 1,5°C ne signifie pas que nous avons échoué à atteindre les objectifs de température à long terme de l’accord de Paris, lesquels portent sur des décennies”, a toutefois rappelé la secrétaire générale de l’OMM, Celeste Saulo, reprenant le message de prudence habituel des grandes agences climatiques.- “alerte précoce” -L’accord historique de 2015 ambitionne de maintenir le réchauffement bien en dessous de 2°C et de poursuivre les efforts pour le limiter à 1,5°C. Mais ces températures font référence à une moyenne climatique – typiquement sur 20 ans – permettant de lisser la variabilité des températures d’une année sur l’autre. Selon cette définition, le réchauffement actuel se situe autour de 1,3°C.Dans les deux études, les chercheurs se demandent malgré tout si le franchissement du seuil de 1,5°C sur une année ne représente pas une “alerte précoce” indiquant que la limite de long terme est déjà en voie d’être franchie.Une équipe basée en Allemagne et en Autriche s’est penchée sur la question en combinant des données d’observation et des modélisations.Les scientifiques constatent que depuis le début du réchauffement climatique, une fois qu’une année a dépassé certains paliers d’augmentation des températures moyennes, elles s’inscrivent sur deux décennies à ce niveau.Ce modèle, si on l’extrapole au seuil de 1,5°C, suggère que la période de 20 ans au-dessus de cette température “a déjà commencé et que les effets attendus à 1,5°C de réchauffement vont commencer à émerger”, écrivent les auteurs. “A moins que des baisses ambitieuses des émissions soient mises en Å“uvre”, soulignent-ils. – “nouvelle ère” -Mais attention, le monde n’en est encore qu’au début de cette période: il faudra probablement attendre son milieu, donc d’ici une dizaine d’années, pour établir que le réchauffement moyen a dépassé 1,5°C sur deux décennies.Cette estimation est cohérente avec celle des scientifiques du Giec, les experts mandatés par l’ONU, qui prévoient qu’il y a une chance sur deux de constater dès 2030-2035 que le climat est réchauffé de 1,5°C en moyenne.La deuxième étude publiée lundi utilise une méthodologie et des périodes de référence légèrement différentes mais pour une conclusion comparable.”Si l’anomalie de 1,5°C continue au-delà de 18 mois consécutifs, il est quasiment certain que le seuil de l’accord de Paris sera franchi”, même dans un scénario d’émissions de gaz à effet de serre intermédiaire (scénario dit “SSP 2-4.5″ du Giec), précise Alex Cannon, du ministère canadien de l’Environnement et du changement climatique. Les scientifiques soulignent l’importance de contenir le plus possible le réchauffement climatique, chaque fraction de degré supplémentaire entraînant plus de risques comme les vagues de chaleur ou la destruction de la vie marine.Contenir le réchauffement à 1,5°C plutôt qu’à 2°C permettrait ainsi de limiter significativement ses conséquences les plus catastrophiques, selon le Giec.”A moins d’entreprendre des mesures urgentes, on ne se souviendra pas de 2024 comme d’une anomalie mais comme le début d’une nouvelle ère climatique, caractérisée par des risques croissants”, a commenté pour l’AFP William Ripple, professeur à l’université d’Oregon, qui n’a pas participé aux études.

Trump: Palestinians have no right of return under Gaza plan

President Donald Trump said Palestinians would have no right of return to Gaza under his US takeover plan, describing his proposal in excerpts of an interview released Monday as a “real estate development for the future.”Trump told Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier that “I would own it” and that there could be as many as six different sites for Palestinians to live outside Gaza under the plan, which the Arab world and others in the international community have rejected.”No, they wouldn’t, because they’re going to have much better housing,” Trump said when Baier asked if the Palestinians would have the right to return to the enclave, most of which has been reduced to rubble by Israel’s military since October 2023.”In other words, I’m talking about building a permanent place for them because if they have to return now, it’ll be years before you could ever — it’s not habitable.”Trump first revealed the shock Gaza plan during a joint news conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, drawing outrage from Palestinians.The US president pressed his case for Palestinians to be moved out of Gaza, devastated by the Israel-Hamas war, and for Egypt and Jordan to take them.Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty flew to Washington in the wake of Trump’s remarks. He met at the State Department on Monday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with neither speaking to the media.Jordan’s King Abdullah II was set to hold talks with Trump on Tuesday.In the Fox interview — which will be broadcast Monday after the first half was screened a day earlier — Trump said he would build “beautiful communities” for the more than two million Palestinians who live in Gaza.”Could be five, six, could be two. But we’ll build safe communities, a little bit away from where they are, where all of this danger is,” added Trump.”In the meantime, I would own this. Think of it as a real estate development for the future. It would be a beautiful piece of land. No big money spent.”- ‘Unacceptable’ -Trump stunned the world when he announced out of the blue last week that the United States would “take over the Gaza Strip,” remove rubble and unexploded bombs and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”But while he initially said that Palestinians could be among the “world people” allowed to live there, he has since appeared to harden his position to suggest that they could not.Netanyahu on Sunday praised Trump’s proposal as “revolutionary”, striking a triumphant tone in a statement to his cabinet following his return from Washington.”President Trump came with a completely different, much better vision for Israel,” said Netanyahu, who was reportedly only briefed on the plan shortly before Trump’s announcement.The reaction from much of the rest of the world has been one of outrage, with Egypt, Jordan, other Arab nations and the Palestinians all rejecting it out of hand.The criticism was not limited to the Arab world, with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday labeling the plan “a scandal,” adding that the forced relocation of Palestinians would be “unacceptable and against international law.”Trump’s plan has also threatened to disrupt the fragile six-week ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, and the chances of it progressing to a second, more permanent phase.Trump, however, repeated his insistence that he could persuade Egypt and Jordan, both major recipients of US military aid, to come around.”I think I could make a deal with Jordan. I think I could make a deal with Egypt. You know, we give them billions and billions of dollars a year,” he told Fox. Last year, Trump described Gaza as being “like Monaco,” while his son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that Israel could clear Gaza of civilians to unlock “waterfront property.”

Trump: Palestinians have no right of return under Gaza plan

President Donald Trump said Palestinians would have no right of return to Gaza under his US takeover plan, describing his proposal in excerpts of an interview released Monday as a “real estate development for the future.”Trump told Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier that “I would own it” and that there could be as many as six different sites for Palestinians to live outside Gaza under the plan, which the Arab world and others in the international community have rejected.”No, they wouldn’t, because they’re going to have much better housing,” Trump said when Baier asked if the Palestinians would have the right to return to the enclave, most of which has been reduced to rubble by Israel’s military since October 2023.”In other words, I’m talking about building a permanent place for them because if they have to return now, it’ll be years before you could ever — it’s not habitable.”Trump first revealed the shock Gaza plan during a joint news conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, drawing outrage from Palestinians.The US president pressed his case for Palestinians to be moved out of Gaza, devastated by the Israel-Hamas war, and for Egypt and Jordan to take them.Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty flew to Washington in the wake of Trump’s remarks. He met at the State Department on Monday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with neither speaking to the media.Jordan’s King Abdullah II was set to hold talks with Trump on Tuesday.In the Fox interview — which will be broadcast Monday after the first half was screened a day earlier — Trump said he would build “beautiful communities” for the more than two million Palestinians who live in Gaza.”Could be five, six, could be two. But we’ll build safe communities, a little bit away from where they are, where all of this danger is,” added Trump.”In the meantime, I would own this. Think of it as a real estate development for the future. It would be a beautiful piece of land. No big money spent.”- ‘Unacceptable’ -Trump stunned the world when he announced out of the blue last week that the United States would “take over the Gaza Strip,” remove rubble and unexploded bombs and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”But while he initially said that Palestinians could be among the “world people” allowed to live there, he has since appeared to harden his position to suggest that they could not.Netanyahu on Sunday praised Trump’s proposal as “revolutionary”, striking a triumphant tone in a statement to his cabinet following his return from Washington.”President Trump came with a completely different, much better vision for Israel,” said Netanyahu, who was reportedly only briefed on the plan shortly before Trump’s announcement.The reaction from much of the rest of the world has been one of outrage, with Egypt, Jordan, other Arab nations and the Palestinians all rejecting it out of hand.The criticism was not limited to the Arab world, with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday labeling the plan “a scandal,” adding that the forced relocation of Palestinians would be “unacceptable and against international law.”Trump’s plan has also threatened to disrupt the fragile six-week ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, and the chances of it progressing to a second, more permanent phase.Trump, however, repeated his insistence that he could persuade Egypt and Jordan, both major recipients of US military aid, to come around.”I think I could make a deal with Jordan. I think I could make a deal with Egypt. You know, we give them billions and billions of dollars a year,” he told Fox. Last year, Trump described Gaza as being “like Monaco,” while his son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that Israel could clear Gaza of civilians to unlock “waterfront property.”