Renee Nicole Good, who was shot and killed by a US immigration agent on Wednesday in the midwestern city of Minneapolis, was an “extremely compassionate” person, her mother told the Minnesota Star-Tribune newspaper.”She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being,” Donna Ganger told the newspaper. The 37-year-old — a poet and a mother to three children — was shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer while she was behind the wheel of her car. The Trump administration was quick to claim her death was an act of self-defense, but local authorities and witnesses dispute that account — and widely shared video evidence has called into question the officer’s use of deadly force. In 2020, Good earned her bachelor’s degree in English literature from Old Dominion University in Virginia, the school said in a statement honoring her Wednesday. “May Renee’s life be a reminder of what unites us: freedom, love, and peace. My hope is for compassion, healing, and reflection at a time that is becoming one of the darkest and most uncertain periods in our nation’s history,” university president Brian O. Hemphill said.Good was a published poet who was awarded the Academy of American Poets 2020 poetry prize while at her university. In a biography for the award, she was described as loving movie marathons and making “messy art with her daughter and two sons.” US media report that her private Instagram account bio described her as a “Poet and writer and wife and mom and shitty guitar strummer from Colorado; experiencing Minneapolis, MN” and had an emoji of a rainbow LGBTQ+ flag.Her children were from her first two marriages and at the time of her death, she was married to a woman, who she lived with in Minneapolis where they were raising her youngest child, a six-year-old boy.More than $800,000 has been raised to support her surviving family.Despite accusations from the Trump administration that she was endangering the lives of federal immigration agents, Good’s mother told the Minnesota Star-Tribune that she was not taking part in any action against ICE. Her first husband, who declined to be identified, told US media that Good was a devoted Christian and was not an activist.

Hours after a fatal shooting in Minneapolis by an immigration agent, AI deepfakes of the victim and the shooter flooded online platforms, underscoring the growing prevalence of what experts call “hallucinated” content after major news events.The victim of Wednesday’s shooting, identified as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, was hit at point-blank range as she apparently tried to drive away from masked agents who were crowding around her Honda SUV.AFP found dozens of posts across social media platforms, primarily the Elon Musk-owned X, in which users shared AI-generated images purporting to “unmask” the agent from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.”We need his name,” Claude Taylor, who heads the anti-Trump political action committee Mad Dog, wrote in a post on X featuring the AI images. The post racked up more than 1.3 million views.Taylor later claimed he deleted the post after he “learned it was AI,” but it was still visible to online users.An authentic clip of the shooting, replayed by multiple media outlets, does not show any of the ICE agents with their masks off.Many of the fabrications were created using Grok, the AI tool developed by Musk’s startup xAI, which has faced heavy criticism over a new “edit” feature that has unleashed a wave of sexually explicit imagery.Some X users used Grok to digitally undress an old photo of Good smiling, as well as a new photo of her body slumped over after the shooting, generating AI images showing her in a bikini.Another woman wrongly identified as the victim was also subjected to similar manipulation.- ‘New reality’ -Another X user posted the image of a masked officer and prompted the chatbot: “Hey @grok remove this person’s face mask.” Grok promptly generated a hyper-realistic image of the man without a mask.There was no immediate comment from X. When reached by AFP, xAI replied with a terse, automated response: “Legacy Media Lies.”Disinformation watchdog NewsGuard identified four AI-generated falsehoods about the shooting, which collectively amassed 4.24 million views across X, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok.The viral fabrications illustrate a new digital reality in which self-proclaimed internet sleuths use widely available generative AI tools to create hyper-realistic visuals and then amplify them across social media platforms that have largely scaled back content moderation.”Given the accessibility of advanced AI tools, it is now standard practice for actors on the internet to ‘add to the story’ of breaking news in ways that do not correspond to what is actually happening, often in politically partisan ways,” Walter Scheirer, from the University of Notre Dame, told AFP.”A new development has been the use of AI to ‘fill in the blanks’ of a story, for instance, the use of AI to ‘reveal’ the face of the ICE officer. This is hallucinated information.” AI tools are also increasingly used to “dehumanize victims” in the aftermath of a crisis event, Scheirer said.One AI image portrayed the woman mistaken for Good as a water fountain, with water pouring out of a hole in her neck.Another depicted her lying on a road, her neck under the knee of a masked agent, in a scene reminiscent of the 2020 police killing of a Black man named George Floyd in Minneapolis, which sparked nationwide racial justice protests.AI fabrications, often amplified by partisan actors, have fueled alternate realities around recent news events, including the US capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and last year’s assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.The AI distortions are “problematic” and are adding to the “growing pollution of our information ecosystem,” Hany Farid, co-founder of GetReal Security and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, told AFP.”I fear that this is our new reality,” he added.

US President Donald Trump is considering adding a second story to the famed White House colonnade as part of his plans to build a huge $400-million ballroom, the architect in charge of the project said Thursday.The addition of a new level above the West Wing colonnade would restore “symmetry” to the presidential residence, Shalom Baranes told the first Washington planning committee meeting on the project.The blueprints already envisage a two-story colonnade linking the main White House mansion to the 1,000-seat ballroom, where Trump plans to host foreign dignitaries and major events.Baranes added that the new ballroom, for which Trump last year demolished the historic East Wing, will be at the same height as the main building to preserve its historic proportions.It is the first time that plans have been unveiled to change the West Wing of the White House. Trump appeared on the roof of the current colonnade earlier this year with the previous architect for the project.”This scheme does require a two-storey colonnade connecting the East Room in the White House to the new ballroom,” Baranes told the National Capital Planning Commission.”The White House is therefore considering the idea of a modest one-storey addition to the West Wing colonnade which would serve to restore a sense of symmetry around the original central pavilion.”The addition would sit above the famous white-columned colonnade, where presidents have been pictured for decades strolling on their way from the main residence to the Oval Office.It would also lie above the briefing room where presidential press secretaries address the media, and the working areas for the White House press corps.Trump faced criticism for demolishing the entire East Wing, the traditional home for the offices of the US first lady, without first consulting historical organizations or the capital planning commission.He has also paved over the grass of the White House Rose Garden.The Republican president has installed his staff secretary Will Scharf — who is often seen at Trump’s side in the Oval Office during his lengthy executive order signing sessions — as head of the commission.The cost of the ballroom has meanwhile soared. The White House cited $200 million when the plans were first unveiled in July, but Trump said in December it could cost double that.

US lawmakers voted Thursday to revive health insurance subsidies that expired at the end of last year, offering hope to millions of Americans facing steep premium hikes — and pressuring the Senate to follow suit.The bill, which passed with Democratic support and backing from a small bloc of Republicans defying their own leadership, would extend enhanced subsidies under the Affordable Care Act — widely known as Obamacare — for three years. Those subsidies lower monthly insurance costs for Americans who buy coverage on government-run marketplaces.Their expiration on January 1 more than doubled payments for many households, reigniting a politically sensitive debate over health care affordability in a year set to be dominated by the high-stakes midterm congressional elections.Even supporters concede the House bill is unlikely to become law in its current form.President Donald Trump has criticized the subsidies as wasteful and has urged Republicans to push for changes, though he has also told lawmakers they may need to be flexible to reach a deal.House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump loyalist, had resisted allowing the measure onto the floor, reflecting deep divisions within his party over the program. But a handful of centrist Republicans joined Democrats in using a rarely successful procedural maneuver — a discharge petition — to force the vote over leadership’s objections.Ultimately, 17 Republicans voted with Democrats to pass the bill, a public break that underscored growing anxiety among lawmakers from competitive districts about voter backlash over rising healthcare costs.”The affordability crisis is not a hoax. It is very real despite what Donald Trump has had to say,” Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of the House Democratic minority, told reporters. “Housing costs are too high. Grocery costs are too high. Utility bills are too high. Childcare costs are too high. And healthcare costs are out of control.” The subsidies were originally created under the Affordable Care Act and expanded during the Covid-19 pandemic, making coverage cheaper and available to more people. An estimated 22 million Americans currently benefit from the enhanced assistance.The bill now heads to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain. A similar three-year extension failed there in December, falling short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates a three-year clean extension of enhanced Obamacare subsidies would cost almost $81 billion over a decade — but would lead to eight million more people getting health insurance by 2029.The House vote appears to have injected new momentum into bipartisan talks now underway in the upper chamber.A small group of senators from both parties has been negotiating a narrower compromise that could include a shorter extension, tighter income limits and new options for directing aid straight to patients rather than insurers.