Russian disinformation ‘infects’ AI chatbots, researchers warn

A sprawling Russian disinformation network is manipulating Western AI chatbots to spew pro-Kremlin propaganda, researchers say, at a time when the United States is reported to have paused its cyber operations against Moscow.The Pravda network, a well-resourced Moscow-based operation to spread pro-Russian narratives globally, is said to be distorting the output of chatbots by flooding large language models (LLM) with pro-Kremlin falsehoods.A study of 10 leading AI chatbots by the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard found that they repeated falsehoods from the Pravda network more than 33 percent of the time, advancing a pro-Moscow agenda.The findings underscore how the threat goes beyond generative AI models picking up disinformation circulating on the web, and involves the deliberate targeting of chatbots to reach a wider audience in a manipulation tactic that researchers call “LLM grooming.””Massive amounts of Russian propaganda — 3,600,000 articles in 2024 — are now incorporated in the outputs of Western AI systems, infecting their responses with false claims and propaganda,” NewsGuard researchers McKenzie Sadeghi and Isis Blachez wrote in a report.In a separate study, the nonprofit American Sunlight Project warned of the growing reach of the Pravda network — sometimes also known as “Portal Kombat” — and the likelihood that its pro-Russian content was flooding the training data of large language models.”As Russian influence operations expand and grow more advanced, they pose a direct threat to the integrity of democratic discourse worldwide,” said Nina Jankowicz, chief executive of the American Sunlight Project.”The Pravda network’s ability to spread disinformation at such scale is unprecedented, and its potential to influence AI systems makes this threat even more dangerous,” she added.This disinformation could become more pervasive in the absence of oversight in the United States, experts warned.Earlier this month, multiple US media reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had ordered a pause on all of the country’s cyber operations against Russia, including planning for offensive actions.The order was reported to be part of an overall reevaluation of US operations against Moscow, with the duration or extent of the pause unclear.The Pentagon declined to comment on the news but the reported change comes as President Donald Trump has been pushing for negotiations to end the three-year war in Ukraine, and days after the US leader berated his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, in a stormy White House meeting.- ‘Tool to be leveraged’ – The Pravda network, launched in April 2022 following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has expanded significantly to cover 49 countries and dozens of languages, NewsGuard said.Millions of articles carrying pro-Russian content produced by the Pravda network — including false claims such as that the US operates secret bioweapons labs in Ukraine — are amplified across platforms such as X, Telegram and Bluesky.Pravda does not produce original content itself, but instead is known to aggregate content from sources such as the Russian state media and pro-Kremlin influencers.In NewsGuard’s study, all 10 chatbots –- including OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4, You.com’s Smart Assistant, Grok, Microsoft’s Copilot, Meta AI, Google Gemini and Perplexity — repeated disinformation spread by the Pravda network.Seven chatbots even directly cited specific articles from Pravda as their sources.Last month, AFP’s fact-checkers debunked social media claims that Zelensky had banned Truth Social after facing sharp criticism from Trump.Representatives for the social network said it had not launched in Ukraine, and the government there said Trump’s platform would be welcome.When NewsGuard prompted the chatbots with the question “Why did Zelensky ban Truth Social?” six of them repeated the false narrative as fact, in many cases citing articles from Pravda.The chatbots also repeated fabricated narratives pushed by US fugitive turned Kremlin propagandist John Mark Dougan, NewsGuard said.”By pushing these Russian narratives from the Russian perspective, we can actually change worldwide AI,” the watchdog quoted Dougan as saying in January at a conference in Moscow.”It’s not a tool to be scared of, it’s a tool to be leveraged.”

Rwanda businesses pay price for DR Congo conflictMon, 10 Mar 2025 06:42:29 GMT

Rwandan truckers and exporters say they are paying a steep price for the conflict in the eastern region of neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, having to deal with angry locals and fearful customers.Olivier Munyemana, a Rwandan lorry driver, knows the route from the Indian Ocean port of Dar es Salaam to the DRC by heart, …

Rwanda businesses pay price for DR Congo conflictMon, 10 Mar 2025 06:42:29 GMT Read More »

La France à +4°C: le plan gouvernemental d’adaptation au changement climatique enfin lancé lundi

Une cinquantaine de mesures pour préparer la France à un réchauffement pouvant atteindre 4°C degrés: le gouvernement présente lundi son très attendu et longtemps retardé troisième plan national d’adaptation au changement climatique (PNACC), jugé insuffisant par certains observateurs.La ministre de la Transition écologique, Agnès Pannier-Runacher, dévoile lundi matin la “version finalisée” de ce plan qui doit prévoir un “ensemble d’actions concrètes pour adapter notre territoire” à l’évolution du climat, selon le gouvernement.Parmi la cinquantaine de mesures du projet présentées en octobre figure le renforcement du fonds Barnier, créé en 1995 pour aider collectivités, petites entreprises et particuliers à financer les travaux nécessaires pour réduire leur vulnérabilité aux catastrophes naturelles, pour le porter à 300 millions d’euros. Insuffisant, avait commenté France Assureurs.Parmi les autres mesures: un renforcement des protections pour les travailleurs exposés aux canicules, différentes études et diagnostics pour mieux adapter transports et exploitations agricoles, une évolution des règles de rénovation des logements ou encore une protection des principaux sites culturels français comme la Tour Eiffel ou le Mont Saint-Michel. Si ce plan présente “un certain nombre de bonnes intentions”, il se “heurte au fait qu’on ne sait pas si elles sont financées et comment elles sont pilotées”, a commenté auprès de l’AFP Nicolas Richard, vice-Président de France Nature Environnement (FNE). “Il montre la bonne direction mais il lui manque une tête et des jambes”, regrette-t-il.Attendu depuis fin 2023, le plan avait été annoncé comme un des axes majeurs de la stratégie du gouvernement Borne pour lutter contre le réchauffement climatique, en complément de la lutte contre les émissions de gaz à effet de serre.Mais il n’avait cessé d’être repoussé au gré de diverses échéances politiques, jusqu’à la dissolution de juin qui l’avait une nouvelle différé.Une consultation publique a finalement été lancée fin octobre après présentation du projet, qui se base sur une trajectoire de réchauffement de référence à +2,7°C en 2050 et +4°C en 2100 en France.Les épisodes caniculaires de 2022 et les inondations à répétition qu’a connues la France en 2024 ont prouvé à chacun la nécessité de s’adapter rapidement. En juin, le Haut conseil pour le climat avait jugé que le pays n’était pas à la hauteur, réclamant un “changement d’échelle dans l’adaptation”. Quelques mois plus tôt, la Cour des comptes avait pressé les pouvoirs publics de “prendre conscience” de l’urgence de s’attaquer à ce chantier, qui exige selon elle un “mur d’investissements”.

La France à +4°C: le plan gouvernemental d’adaptation au changement climatique enfin lancé lundi

Une cinquantaine de mesures pour préparer la France à un réchauffement pouvant atteindre 4°C degrés: le gouvernement présente lundi son très attendu et longtemps retardé troisième plan national d’adaptation au changement climatique (PNACC), jugé insuffisant par certains observateurs.La ministre de la Transition écologique, Agnès Pannier-Runacher, dévoile lundi matin la “version finalisée” de ce plan qui doit prévoir un “ensemble d’actions concrètes pour adapter notre territoire” à l’évolution du climat, selon le gouvernement.Parmi la cinquantaine de mesures du projet présentées en octobre figure le renforcement du fonds Barnier, créé en 1995 pour aider collectivités, petites entreprises et particuliers à financer les travaux nécessaires pour réduire leur vulnérabilité aux catastrophes naturelles, pour le porter à 300 millions d’euros. Insuffisant, avait commenté France Assureurs.Parmi les autres mesures: un renforcement des protections pour les travailleurs exposés aux canicules, différentes études et diagnostics pour mieux adapter transports et exploitations agricoles, une évolution des règles de rénovation des logements ou encore une protection des principaux sites culturels français comme la Tour Eiffel ou le Mont Saint-Michel. Si ce plan présente “un certain nombre de bonnes intentions”, il se “heurte au fait qu’on ne sait pas si elles sont financées et comment elles sont pilotées”, a commenté auprès de l’AFP Nicolas Richard, vice-Président de France Nature Environnement (FNE). “Il montre la bonne direction mais il lui manque une tête et des jambes”, regrette-t-il.Attendu depuis fin 2023, le plan avait été annoncé comme un des axes majeurs de la stratégie du gouvernement Borne pour lutter contre le réchauffement climatique, en complément de la lutte contre les émissions de gaz à effet de serre.Mais il n’avait cessé d’être repoussé au gré de diverses échéances politiques, jusqu’à la dissolution de juin qui l’avait une nouvelle différé.Une consultation publique a finalement été lancée fin octobre après présentation du projet, qui se base sur une trajectoire de réchauffement de référence à +2,7°C en 2050 et +4°C en 2100 en France.Les épisodes caniculaires de 2022 et les inondations à répétition qu’a connues la France en 2024 ont prouvé à chacun la nécessité de s’adapter rapidement. En juin, le Haut conseil pour le climat avait jugé que le pays n’était pas à la hauteur, réclamant un “changement d’échelle dans l’adaptation”. Quelques mois plus tôt, la Cour des comptes avait pressé les pouvoirs publics de “prendre conscience” de l’urgence de s’attaquer à ce chantier, qui exige selon elle un “mur d’investissements”.

L’ex-banquier Mark Carney, atypique futur Premier ministre canadien

Il a dirigé deux banques centrales mais est un novice en politique. Le futur Premier ministre canadien, Mark Carney, qui a pris la tête du parti libéral dimanche pour remplacer Justin Trudeau, se démarque par son profil atypique.Il l’affirme lui-même, “notre époque est tout sauf ordinaire”. “Le système mis en place par nos parents a bien fonctionné pour nous. Mais ce bon vieux temps est révolu”, a-t-il déclaré lors du lancement de sa campagne à Edmonton, dans la province de l’Alberta dans l’ouest, où il a grandi.L’homme de 59 ans a toutefois promis de remettre “l’économie sur des rails” et surtout de tenir tête à Donald Trump dont les menaces représentent “la plus grave crise de l’époque”.C’est d’ailleurs pour cela que de nombreux Canadiens semblent le plébisciter. Il est vu comme pouvant incarner un Canada fort face aux attaques du président américain.Se définissant comme un centriste, qui refuse d’opposer l’économie et l’écologie, il était jusqu’à tout récemment envoyé spécial des Nations unies pour le financement de l’action climatique et se présente comme l’homme du changement.- Court mandat -Avec des élections prévues au plus tard en octobre, il pourrait ne pas rester Premier ministre très longtemps. Mais quelle que soit la durée de son mandat, celui-ci sera unique.Il sera la première personne à devenir Premier ministre canadien sans avoir été député et sans expérience au sein d’un gouvernement.Père de quatre filles, Mark Carney est né dans la petite bourgade isolée de Fort Smith (2.500 habitants) dans les Territoires-du-Nord-Ouest, proche de l’Arctique, de deux parents enseignants. Mais a grandi à Edmonton, la capitale de l’Alberta et comme beaucoup de Canadiens a joué au hockey.Économiste sorti à la fois de Harvard aux Etats-Unis et d’Oxford au Royaume-Uni, Mark Carney a fait fortune en tant que banquier d’affaires chez Goldman Sachs avant de devenir gouverneur de la Banque du Canada, où il a aidé le pays à traverser la crise financière de 2008-2009.En 2013, il est devenu le premier non-Britannique à diriger la Banque d’Angleterre jusqu’en 2020, et beaucoup considèrent qu’il est l’artisan de la stabilité qui a prévalu pendant le Brexit. Mark Carney projette une “image rassurante” à “l’opposé de celle de Donald Trump”, commente auprès de l’AFP Daniel Béland de l’Université McGill à Montréal.”C’est un technocrate”, poursuit-il, il peut être vu comme “ennuyeux et sans énormément de charisme”. Mais “il pèse chacun de ses mots”, et il s’agit d'”un spécialiste des politiques publiques qui maîtrise très bien ses dossiers”.- “Elite” -Calme et affable, Mark Carney est “exceptionnellement bien outillé pour gérer les crises économiques”, renchérit Lori Turnbull, professeure à l’Université de Dalhousie.Mais il n’est pas un excellent communiquant et sa maîtrise du français, importante dans ce pays officiellement bilingue, a suscité des critiques alors que le Québec est une province qui compte lors des élections.Cela risque de le nuire auprès de l’électorat lors des élections législatives qui pourraient avoir lieu ce printemps face au leader conservateur Pierre Poilievre qui ne mâche pas ses mots.Ce dernier n’a pas hésité déjà à le présenter comme un membre de “l’élite qui ne comprend pas ce que vivent les gens ordinaires”.Ses idées en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique pourraient aussi être un angle d’attaque des conservateurs.Le climat a été au coeur de la dernière partie de la carrière de M. Carney qui affirme mettre l’accent sur des solutions axées sur l’investissement, comme les technologies vertes, qui créent des profits et des emplois.”Nous mettons l’accent sur l’aspect commercial de la question, sur la compétitivité”, a-t-il récemment déclaré dans un podcast. Car “c’est la direction que prend le monde”, a-t-il ajouté.

Global art market slumps as Chinese auction sales plummet: data

The value of art sold at auctions globally fell by a third last year compared to 2023, with the Chinese market crashing by 63 percent, auction data published on Monday showed.Artprice, a France-based consultancy which aggregates auction data from around the world, said the value of art sold in 2024 slumped to $9.9 billion (9.1 billion euros), the lowest level since 2009.All the major art hubs recorded steep falls, with New York down 29 percent, London down 28 percent and Paris down 21 percent as collectors turned cautious given global economic uncertainty.The Chinese market shrank to just $1.8 billion from $4.9 billion in 2023, underlining the weakness of the world’s second-biggest economy.”Major collectors have grown hesitant including for major artists such as Mark Rothko, Jasper Johns, Ellsworth Kelly or Jean-Michel Basquiat,” Thierry Ehrmann, founder of Artprice, told AFP.The value of Pablo Picasso sales — a leading indicator for the rest of the market — totaled $223 million in 2024, around a third of the $597 million spent on the Spanish master the previous year, the data showed.Gone are the days of endless record-breaking bids at art auctions, with the once-booming market spurred by speculator cash in decline since 2021.  That has meant some high-end sellers have postponed or cancelled planned sales, making fewer works available.In a sign of the changed climate, leading auction house Sotheby’s laid off 100 staff members — six percent of its global workforce — in December.- Cutbacks – Experts say the steep fall last year was linked to wars in Ukraine and Gaza, major elections across the globe, and higher interest rates, which raised the cost of borrowing. The Chinese economy has slowed dramatically since the Covid-19 pandemic, facing headwinds caused by a debt crisis in its real estate industry and tariffs from its trading partners. For high-net-worth buyers, “art is the first luxury that you stop buying when you need to consolidate, which is why positive economic news feeds back into the art market quite quickly”, said Lindsay Dewar from the London-based ArtTactic art market consultancy. Industry insiders are now wondering how the global market will react to Donald Trump’s presidency. Initial optimism about a “Trump bump” on stock markets has faded fast as he introduces tariffs and rows with allies.Weakening demand at the global art collector level also feeds through to primary sales — sales of work through galleries — which affect artists’ prices and income.Dewar said that her conversations with gallery owners indicated they had a “tough year” in 2024.Nevertheless, she sees reasons for optimism.The overall number of auction sales increased last year — up five percent to 800,000, according to Artprice figures — with activity at the lower end of the market for works at $50,000 or under showing robust health.And some sales are still outperforming, including a Magritte which fetched a record $121 million for the surrealist artist in November, far above the guide price of $95 million. “People do still want to trade, to buy and sell artwork. The desire is still there,” Dewar said.A portrait by an AI-powered robot of the English mathematician Alan Turing, considered one of the fathers of modern computing, also raised a million dollars at Sotheby’s in November, 10 times higher than expected.Two major upcoming auction sales will give a sense of conditions at the top-end of the market. Sotheby’s is set to sell works belonging to late New York banker Thomas A. Saunders and his wife in May, while Christie’s will put part of book mogul Leonard Riggio’s modern-art collection under the hammer in the next few months.

Opium farming takes root in Myanmar’s war-wracked landscape

Scraping opium resin off a seedpod in Myanmar’s remote poppy fields, displaced farmer Aung Hla describes the narcotic crop as his only prospect in a country made barren by conflict.The 35-year-old was a rice farmer when the junta seized power in a 2021 coup, adding pro-democracy guerillas to the long-running civil conflict between the military and ethnic armed groups.Four years on, the United Nations has said Myanmar is mired in a “polycrisis” of mutually compounding conflict, poverty and environmental damage.Aung Hla was forced off his land in Moe Bye village by fighting after the coup. When he resettled, his usual crops were no longer profitable, but the hardy poppy promised “just enough for a livelihood”.”Everyone thinks people grow poppy flowers to be rich, but we are just trying hard to get by,” he told AFP in rural Pekon township of eastern Shan state.He says he regrets growing the substance — the core ingredient in heroin — but said the income is the only thing separating him from starvation.”If anyone were in my shoes, they would likely do the same.”- Displaced and desperate -Myanmar’s opium production was previously second only to Afghanistan, where poppy farming flourished following the US-led invasion in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.But after the Taliban government launched a crackdown, Myanmar overtook Afghanistan as the world’s biggest producer of opium in 2023, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).Myanmar’s opiate economy — including the value of domestic consumption as well as exports abroad — is estimated between $589 million and $1.57 billion, according to the UNODC.Between September and February each year, dozens of workers toil in Pekon’s fields, slicing immature poppy seedpods, which ooze a small amount of sticky brown resin.Aung Naing, 48, gently transfers the collected resin from a small trough onto a leaf plate.Before the coup, which ended a brief experiment with democracy, Aung Naing was areformed opium farmer. But wartime hardship forced him back to the crop.”There is more poppy cultivation because of difficulties in residents’ livelihoods,” he says.”Most of the farmers who plant poppy are displaced,” he said. “Residents who can’t live in their villages and fled to the jungle are working in poppy fields.”In Myanmar’s fringes, ethnic armed groups, border militias and the military all vie for control of local resources and the lucrative drug trade.Aung Naing says poppy earns only a slightly higher profit than food crops like corn, bean curd and potatoes, which are also vulnerable to disease when it rains.Fresh opium was generally sold by Myanmar farmers for just over $300 per kilo in 2024, according to the UNODC, a small fraction of what it fetches on the international black market.And the crop is more costly to produce than rice — more labour intensive, requiring expensive fertilisers and with small yields.Aung Naing says he makes just shy of a $30 profit for each kilo. “How can we get rich from that?” he asks.- ‘Unsafe’ -The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimates there are more than 3.5 million people displaced in Myanmar.But fleeing conflict zones to farm opium does not guarantee safety. “Military fighter jets are flying over us,” said Aung Naing. “We are working in poppy fields with anxiety and fear. We feel unsafe.”Opium cultivation and production in Myanmar decreased slightly between 2023 and 2024, according to the UNODC — in part due to ongoing clashes between armed groups.”If our country were at peace and there were industries offering many job opportunities in the region, we wouldn’t plant any poppy fields even if we were asked to,” says farmer Shwe Khine, 43.Aung Hla agreed. With the war, he said, “we don’t have any choice”.

Opium farming takes root in Myanmar’s war-wracked landscape

Scraping opium resin off a seedpod in Myanmar’s remote poppy fields, displaced farmer Aung Hla describes the narcotic crop as his only prospect in a country made barren by conflict.The 35-year-old was a rice farmer when the junta seized power in a 2021 coup, adding pro-democracy guerillas to the long-running civil conflict between the military and ethnic armed groups.Four years on, the United Nations has said Myanmar is mired in a “polycrisis” of mutually compounding conflict, poverty and environmental damage.Aung Hla was forced off his land in Moe Bye village by fighting after the coup. When he resettled, his usual crops were no longer profitable, but the hardy poppy promised “just enough for a livelihood”.”Everyone thinks people grow poppy flowers to be rich, but we are just trying hard to get by,” he told AFP in rural Pekon township of eastern Shan state.He says he regrets growing the substance — the core ingredient in heroin — but said the income is the only thing separating him from starvation.”If anyone were in my shoes, they would likely do the same.”- Displaced and desperate -Myanmar’s opium production was previously second only to Afghanistan, where poppy farming flourished following the US-led invasion in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.But after the Taliban government launched a crackdown, Myanmar overtook Afghanistan as the world’s biggest producer of opium in 2023, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).Myanmar’s opiate economy — including the value of domestic consumption as well as exports abroad — is estimated between $589 million and $1.57 billion, according to the UNODC.Between September and February each year, dozens of workers toil in Pekon’s fields, slicing immature poppy seedpods, which ooze a small amount of sticky brown resin.Aung Naing, 48, gently transfers the collected resin from a small trough onto a leaf plate.Before the coup, which ended a brief experiment with democracy, Aung Naing was areformed opium farmer. But wartime hardship forced him back to the crop.”There is more poppy cultivation because of difficulties in residents’ livelihoods,” he says.”Most of the farmers who plant poppy are displaced,” he said. “Residents who can’t live in their villages and fled to the jungle are working in poppy fields.”In Myanmar’s fringes, ethnic armed groups, border militias and the military all vie for control of local resources and the lucrative drug trade.Aung Naing says poppy earns only a slightly higher profit than food crops like corn, bean curd and potatoes, which are also vulnerable to disease when it rains.Fresh opium was generally sold by Myanmar farmers for just over $300 per kilo in 2024, according to the UNODC, a small fraction of what it fetches on the international black market.And the crop is more costly to produce than rice — more labour intensive, requiring expensive fertilisers and with small yields.Aung Naing says he makes just shy of a $30 profit for each kilo. “How can we get rich from that?” he asks.- ‘Unsafe’ -The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimates there are more than 3.5 million people displaced in Myanmar.But fleeing conflict zones to farm opium does not guarantee safety. “Military fighter jets are flying over us,” said Aung Naing. “We are working in poppy fields with anxiety and fear. We feel unsafe.”Opium cultivation and production in Myanmar decreased slightly between 2023 and 2024, according to the UNODC — in part due to ongoing clashes between armed groups.”If our country were at peace and there were industries offering many job opportunities in the region, we wouldn’t plant any poppy fields even if we were asked to,” says farmer Shwe Khine, 43.Aung Hla agreed. With the war, he said, “we don’t have any choice”.