WHO countries reach landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics

Years of negotiations culminated early Wednesday with countries agreeing the text of a landmark accord on how to tackle future pandemics, aimed at avoiding a repeat of the mistakes made during the Covid-19 crisis.After more than three years of talks and one last marathon session, weary delegates at the World Health Organization’s headquarters sealed the deal at around 2:00 am (0000 GMT) Wednesday.”Tonight marks a significant milestone in our shared journey towards a safer world,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said.”The nations of the world made history in Geneva today.”Five years after Covid-19 killed millions of people and devastated economies, a growing sense of urgency hung over the talks, with new health threats lurking, ranging from H5N1 bird flu to measles, mpox and Ebola.The final stretch of negotiations also took place with cuts to US foreign aid spending and threatened tariffs on pharmaceuticals casting a shadow over the talks.- ‘It’s adopted’ -Right until the last minute, disagreement had lingered over a few thorny issues.Negotiators stumbled over the agreement’s Article 11, which deals with transferring technology for pandemic health products towards developing nations.During the Covid-19 pandemic, poorer states accused rich countries of hoarding vaccines and tests.Countries with large pharmaceutical industries have strenuously opposed the idea of mandatory tech transfers, insisting they must be voluntary.But it appeared the obstacle could be overcome by adding that any transfer needed to be “mutually agreed”.The core the agreement is a proposed Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), aimed at allowing the swift sharing of pathogen data with pharmaceutical companies, enabling them to quickly start working on pandemic-fighting products.In the end, the 32-page agreement was entirely highlighted in green, indicating it had been fully approved by WHO member states.”It’s adopted,” negotiations co-chair Anne-Claire Amprou announced, to thundering applause.”In drafting this historic agreement, the countries of the world have demonstrated their shared commitment to preventing and protecting everyone, everywhere, from future pandemic threats.”The finalised text will now be presented for sign-off at the WHO’s annual assembly next month.- ‘More equity’ -As intense talks in corridors and closed rooms drew towards an end late on Tuesday, Tedros joined the negotiations, telling reporters he thought the current draft was “balanced”, and that a deal would bring “more equity”.While taking measures to coordinate pandemic prevention, preparedness and response could be costly, “the cost of inaction is much bigger”, he insisted.”Virus is the worst enemy. (It) could be worse than a war.”The United States, which has thrown the global health system into crisis by slashing foreign aid spending, was not present.US President Donald Trump ordered a withdrawal from the United Nations’ health agency and from the pandemic agreement talks after taking office in January.However, the US absence, and Trump’s threat to slap steep tariffs on pharmaceutical products, still hung over the talks, making manufacturers and governments more jittery.But in the end, countries reached consensus.Many saw the approval of the text as a victory for global cooperation.”At a time when multilateralism is under threat, WHO member states have joined together to say that we will defeat the next pandemic threat in the only way possible: by working together,” said former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark, co-chair of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.As the congratulatory speeches continued on towards daybreak, Eswatini’s representative stressed that “whilst we celebrate this moment, we need not rest on our laurels”.”The real work begins now.”

WHO countries reach landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics

Years of negotiations culminated early Wednesday with countries agreeing the text of a landmark accord on how to tackle future pandemics, aimed at avoiding a repeat of the mistakes made during the Covid-19 crisis.After more than three years of talks and one last marathon session, weary delegates at the World Health Organization’s headquarters sealed the deal at around 2:00 am (0000 GMT) Wednesday.”Tonight marks a significant milestone in our shared journey towards a safer world,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said.”The nations of the world made history in Geneva today.”Five years after Covid-19 killed millions of people and devastated economies, a growing sense of urgency hung over the talks, with new health threats lurking, ranging from H5N1 bird flu to measles, mpox and Ebola.The final stretch of negotiations also took place with cuts to US foreign aid spending and threatened tariffs on pharmaceuticals casting a shadow over the talks.- ‘It’s adopted’ -Right until the last minute, disagreement had lingered over a few thorny issues.Negotiators stumbled over the agreement’s Article 11, which deals with transferring technology for pandemic health products towards developing nations.During the Covid-19 pandemic, poorer states accused rich countries of hoarding vaccines and tests.Countries with large pharmaceutical industries have strenuously opposed the idea of mandatory tech transfers, insisting they must be voluntary.But it appeared the obstacle could be overcome by adding that any transfer needed to be “mutually agreed”.The core the agreement is a proposed Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), aimed at allowing the swift sharing of pathogen data with pharmaceutical companies, enabling them to quickly start working on pandemic-fighting products.In the end, the 32-page agreement was entirely highlighted in green, indicating it had been fully approved by WHO member states.”It’s adopted,” negotiations co-chair Anne-Claire Amprou announced, to thundering applause.”In drafting this historic agreement, the countries of the world have demonstrated their shared commitment to preventing and protecting everyone, everywhere, from future pandemic threats.”The finalised text will now be presented for sign-off at the WHO’s annual assembly next month.- ‘More equity’ -As intense talks in corridors and closed rooms drew towards an end late on Tuesday, Tedros joined the negotiations, telling reporters he thought the current draft was “balanced”, and that a deal would bring “more equity”.While taking measures to coordinate pandemic prevention, preparedness and response could be costly, “the cost of inaction is much bigger”, he insisted.”Virus is the worst enemy. (It) could be worse than a war.”The United States, which has thrown the global health system into crisis by slashing foreign aid spending, was not present.US President Donald Trump ordered a withdrawal from the United Nations’ health agency and from the pandemic agreement talks after taking office in January.However, the US absence, and Trump’s threat to slap steep tariffs on pharmaceutical products, still hung over the talks, making manufacturers and governments more jittery.But in the end, countries reached consensus.Many saw the approval of the text as a victory for global cooperation.”At a time when multilateralism is under threat, WHO member states have joined together to say that we will defeat the next pandemic threat in the only way possible: by working together,” said former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark, co-chair of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.As the congratulatory speeches continued on towards daybreak, Eswatini’s representative stressed that “whilst we celebrate this moment, we need not rest on our laurels”.”The real work begins now.”

WHO countries reach landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics

Years of negotiations culminated early Wednesday with countries agreeing the text of a landmark accord on how to tackle future pandemics, aimed at avoiding a repeat of the mistakes made during the Covid-19 crisis.After more than three years of talks and one last marathon session, weary delegates at the World Health Organization’s headquarters sealed the deal at around 2:00 am (0000 GMT) Wednesday.”Tonight marks a significant milestone in our shared journey towards a safer world,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said.”The nations of the world made history in Geneva today.”Five years after Covid-19 killed millions of people and devastated economies, a growing sense of urgency hung over the talks, with new health threats lurking, ranging from H5N1 bird flu to measles, mpox and Ebola.The final stretch of negotiations also took place with cuts to US foreign aid spending and threatened tariffs on pharmaceuticals casting a shadow over the talks.- ‘It’s adopted’ -Right until the last minute, disagreement had lingered over a few thorny issues.Negotiators stumbled over the agreement’s Article 11, which deals with transferring technology for pandemic health products towards developing nations.During the Covid-19 pandemic, poorer states accused rich countries of hoarding vaccines and tests.Countries with large pharmaceutical industries have strenuously opposed the idea of mandatory tech transfers, insisting they must be voluntary.But it appeared the obstacle could be overcome by adding that any transfer needed to be “mutually agreed”.The core the agreement is a proposed Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), aimed at allowing the swift sharing of pathogen data with pharmaceutical companies, enabling them to quickly start working on pandemic-fighting products.In the end, the 32-page agreement was entirely highlighted in green, indicating it had been fully approved by WHO member states.”It’s adopted,” negotiations co-chair Anne-Claire Amprou announced, to thundering applause.”In drafting this historic agreement, the countries of the world have demonstrated their shared commitment to preventing and protecting everyone, everywhere, from future pandemic threats.”The finalised text will now be presented for sign-off at the WHO’s annual assembly next month.- ‘More equity’ -As intense talks in corridors and closed rooms drew towards an end late on Tuesday, Tedros joined the negotiations, telling reporters he thought the current draft was “balanced”, and that a deal would bring “more equity”.While taking measures to coordinate pandemic prevention, preparedness and response could be costly, “the cost of inaction is much bigger”, he insisted.”Virus is the worst enemy. (It) could be worse than a war.”The United States, which has thrown the global health system into crisis by slashing foreign aid spending, was not present.US President Donald Trump ordered a withdrawal from the United Nations’ health agency and from the pandemic agreement talks after taking office in January.However, the US absence, and Trump’s threat to slap steep tariffs on pharmaceutical products, still hung over the talks, making manufacturers and governments more jittery.But in the end, countries reached consensus.Many saw the approval of the text as a victory for global cooperation.”At a time when multilateralism is under threat, WHO member states have joined together to say that we will defeat the next pandemic threat in the only way possible: by working together,” said former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark, co-chair of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.As the congratulatory speeches continued on towards daybreak, Eswatini’s representative stressed that “whilst we celebrate this moment, we need not rest on our laurels”.”The real work begins now.”

Biden s’en prend à Trump dans son premier discours d’ex-président

“Tant de destruction”. Joe Biden s’est livré mardi à une attaque en règle de son successeur Donald Trump dans son premier discours public depuis qu’il a quitté la Maison Blanche, le 20 janvier dernier.”Voyez ce qui s’est passé: cela ne fait pas encore 100 jours et cette nouvelle administration a fait tant de dégâts et tant de destruction”, a dénoncé l’ex-président, qui s’exprimait à Chicago (nord) lors d’une conférence consacrée à la “Sécurité sociale”, le système de retraites américain.”Tout cela est arrivé si vite, c’est à couper le souffle”, a-t-il ajouté, dans un discours de près d’une demi-heure parsemé de pointes d’humour. Mais aussi de quelques moments de flottement, quand Joe Biden a par exemple bafouillé sur certaines phrases ou peiné à arriver au bout d’anecdotes, conclues avant la fin par un “Bref”.Sur son réseau Truth Social, Donald Trump, souvent prompt à se moquer de son ancien adversaire à la présidentielle, a republié l’extrait de l’une de ces tirades inachevées, sans ajouter de commentaire à l’écrit.M. Biden, 82 ans, a accusé l’administration Trump de s’en prendre à la Sécurité sociale, agence fédérale notamment chargée de distribuer les retraites publiques ou les pensions d’invalidité à 68 millions de bénéficiaires.”Ils attaquent la Sécurité sociale à coups de hache, licenciant 7.000 fonctionnaires, y compris les plus chevronnés. Ils s’apprêtent à en pousser des milliers d’autres vers la porte”, a dénoncé l’ancien chef d’Etat. “Pourquoi veulent-ils la dévaliser? C’est pour offrir d’énormes baisses d’impôts aux milliardaires”, a martelé l’ancien président démocrate, accusé d’avoir tardé à céder la place l’an dernier à sa vice-présidente Kamala Harris dans la course à la Maison Blanche, donnant ainsi un avantage à son adversaire républicain.”La Sécurité sociale mérite d’être protégée pour le bien de la nation tout entière”, a-t-il dit. “Il ne s’agit pas seulement de pensions de retraite. Il s’agit d’honorer un lien de confiance fondamental entre l’Etat et le peuple”.En février, l’administration Trump a nommé temporairement un “expert anti-fraude” à la tête de la Sécurité sociale.Elon Musk, chargé par Donald Trump d’une cure d’amaigrissement de l’Etat fédéral, affirme que de nombreuses fraudes minent le fonctionnement de la Sécurité sociale, avec notamment plusieurs millions de bénéficiaires âgés de plus de cent ans, sans avancer de données détaillées et publiques.

Trump orders critical minerals probe that may bring new tariffs

US President Donald Trump ordered a probe Tuesday that may result in tariffs on critical minerals, rare-earth metals and associated products such as smartphones, in an escalation of his dispute with global trade partners.Trump has upended markets in recent weeks with his sweeping on-off levies, and this investigation could see him impose further tariffs if it shows that imports of critical minerals and their derivatives endanger US national security.China dominates global supply chains for rare metals.Without naming any other countries, the order says that the United States is dependent on foreign sources that “are at risk of serious, sustained, and long-term supply chain shocks.”It states that this dependence “raises the potential for risks to national security, defense readiness, price stability, and economic prosperity and resilience.”The imports targeted include so-called critical minerals like cobalt, lithium and nickel, rare-earth elements, as well as products that partly require these resources, such as electric vehicles and batteries.The order states that critical minerals and their derivatives are essential for US military and energy infrastructure, noting their use in jet engines, missile guidance systems and advanced computing, among others.The Department of Commerce will have up to 180 days to deliver its report to Trump, the order says, adding that any recommendations for action should consider the imposition of tariffs.It follows a similar “national security” investigation that Trump ordered Monday into pharmaceutical imports, and another on semiconductors and chip-making equipment.The process is based on a 1962 law that was seldom used before Trump, during his first 2017-2021 term, called on it to justify imposing taxes on steel and aluminum imports. The US president again resorted to this law, known as Section 232, to reintroduce in mid-March tariffs of 25 percent on steel and aluminum, and on automobiles. Trump has slapped new tariffs on friend and foe since returning to the presidency this year in a wide-ranging but often chaotic attempt to reorder the world economy by using levies to force manufacturers to relocate to the United States. 

Trump orders critical minerals probe that may bring new tariffs

US President Donald Trump ordered a probe Tuesday that may result in tariffs on critical minerals, rare-earth metals and associated products such as smartphones, in an escalation of his dispute with global trade partners.Trump has upended markets in recent weeks with his sweeping on-off levies, and this investigation could see him impose further tariffs if it shows that imports of critical minerals and their derivatives endanger US national security.China dominates global supply chains for rare metals.Without naming any other countries, the order says that the United States is dependent on foreign sources that “are at risk of serious, sustained, and long-term supply chain shocks.”It states that this dependence “raises the potential for risks to national security, defense readiness, price stability, and economic prosperity and resilience.”The imports targeted include so-called critical minerals like cobalt, lithium and nickel, rare-earth elements, as well as products that partly require these resources, such as electric vehicles and batteries.The order states that critical minerals and their derivatives are essential for US military and energy infrastructure, noting their use in jet engines, missile guidance systems and advanced computing, among others.The Department of Commerce will have up to 180 days to deliver its report to Trump, the order says, adding that any recommendations for action should consider the imposition of tariffs.It follows a similar “national security” investigation that Trump ordered Monday into pharmaceutical imports, and another on semiconductors and chip-making equipment.The process is based on a 1962 law that was seldom used before Trump, during his first 2017-2021 term, called on it to justify imposing taxes on steel and aluminum imports. The US president again resorted to this law, known as Section 232, to reintroduce in mid-March tariffs of 25 percent on steel and aluminum, and on automobiles. Trump has slapped new tariffs on friend and foe since returning to the presidency this year in a wide-ranging but often chaotic attempt to reorder the world economy by using levies to force manufacturers to relocate to the United States. 

Congrès des Ecologistes: un vote sans suspense mais pas sans critiques

Les 16.000 adhérents écologistes votent de mercredi à vendredi pour choisir leur chef, et devraient sans suspense reconduire Marine Tondelier, qui a explosé médiatiquement depuis trois ans mais s’est attiré des critiques en interne, dans un parti qu’elle voulait apaiser.Forte, avant même le vote, de 2.500 soutiens d’adhérents, la conseillère régionale des Hauts-de-France, âgée de 38 ans, ne fait pas mystère de sa certitude d’être réélue à la tête des Ecologistes. Et sans doute dès le premier tour, face à trois concurrents moins médiatiques: l’ex-eurodéputée Karima Delli, le maire-adjoint de Paris Florentin Letissier et celle de Bordeaux Harmonie Lecerf-Meunier.Mais celle qui déplorait lors de son élection en 2022 les querelles intestines régulières du parti n’a pas échappé aux tensions: ses opposants ont dénoncé un “manque de démocratie” au sein de la formation, mettant en cause la récente modification des règles électorales, au service selon eux de la secrétaire nationale.”Mes opposants n’ont pas grand chose à redire au bilan de l’équipe sortante”, rétorque Marine Tondelier. “Donc ils ont passé plus de temps à se plaindre des nouveaux statuts, pourtant écrits au consensus avec toutes les sensibilités du parti et votés par 74% des adhérents, qu’à parler d’écologie politique”, ajoute la patronne des Verts, déjà en train d’écrire son discours pour son investiture le 26 avril. Marine Tondelier a remporté la semaine dernière un premier vote sur la désignation d’une partie des membres du Conseil fédéral, mais ses opposants soulignent qu’elle n’a obtenu qu’une majorité relative. “Quel que soit son score au poste de secrétaire nationale, elle n’aura pas de majorité”, affirme un observateur, qui estime que “si elle n’a pas fait plus, c’est à cause de la participation, la plus faible historiquement pour un congrès”. Marine Tondelier compte, pour cette deuxième phase du congrès, sur 3.000 adhérents supplémentaires, qui n’avaient pas les six mois de cotisation nécessaires pour voter lors de la première phase.    En plus du vote pour la tête du parti, les militants sont aussi invités à choisir, par des votes uninominaux, le secrétariat exécutif (deux secrétaires nationaux adjoints, deux porte-parole et un trésorier). “Le système électoral est fait pour qu’elle ait les six postes”, remarque un écologiste, “mais il y a un sujet Eric Piolle”. – Incontournable à gauche –  Le maire de Grenoble, qui souhaite devenir porte-parole, a été évincé de la liste Tondelier, qui lui a préféré un candidat de la Manche issu de la ruralité, Guillaume Hédouin. Mais Eric Piolle, premier maire écologiste d’une grande ville, a maintenu sa candidature et peut espérer l’emporter, au regard de sa notoriété. Dans un email interne, Marine Tondelier a clairement appelé à voter pour M. Hédouin, arguant que s’il n’était pas élu, cela signifierait qu’elle a “essayé de donner plus de voix aux ruralités”, mais que “les adhérents n’ont pas voulu”.Les militants doivent également voter pour les membres du bureau politique (12 membres, scrutin de liste à la proportionnelle), et devraient permettre à la députée Sandrine Rousseau d’être présente dans cette instance, malgré une modification du quota des représentants franciliens.Pour l’observateur cité plus haut, “Marine élimine les gens pour être la seule candidate possible en 2027” lors de la présidentielle.Des accusations qui exaspèrent Marine Tondelier, au regret de constater que “les congrès sont toujours l’occasion donnée aux journalistes de nous caricaturer en égoïstes querelleurs”.     Malgré des reproches en interne sur sa gestion de l’affaire Julien Bayou, et sur l’échec cinglant des Européennes (5,5%), celle qui ne se déplace plus sans son emblématique veste verte préfère revendiquer ses succès.Elle rappelle que depuis son élection, les Ecologistes ont gagné plus de 240.000 sympathisants et engrangé plus de 18.000 adhérents, et “n’ont jamais eu autant d’élus locaux et nationaux”, ni eu une secrétaire nationale avec “autant de visibilité médiatique”.Elle se targue aussi d’avoir rendu son parti incontournable dans l’union de la gauche, après la dissolution de l’Assemblée nationale. “Mon travail à la fin du congrès sera d’être moteur de la construction de l’unité” pour 2027, souligne-t-elle.    Et si elle refuse de s’exprimer sur ses ambitions présidentielles, ses proches assurent qu’elle serait “la leader naturelle” s’il fallait désigner une candidature écologiste.