Locked up for more than four years and ailing, Hong Kong’s pro-democracy media mogul Jimmy Lai would only become a greater symbol if he died in prison, his son said.On a visit to Washington, Sebastien Lai was meeting US officials and lawmakers as he appealed for greater international pressure on China and Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing authorities to free his father.”It’s horrible for me to say this, but if my father dies in prison, he’s actually a stronger symbol of freedom, of martyrdom for your beliefs,” Lai told AFP in an interview Monday.He said that freeing his father would be in Beijing’s own interest.”As you’ve seen with a lot of dissidents, once they’re released, they lose a lot of that, quote-unquote, power,” he said.”He’s already been there for five years. He’s served whatever sham sentence you brought against him.”Lai, 77, founded the Apple Daily, a popular pro-democracy tabloid that was shuttered as China clamped down on the metropolis, despite promises of a separate system when Britain handed it over in 1997.A successful businessman and outspoken opponent of Beijing, Lai was arrested in late 2020 and has been behind bars since, with a judge last month saying only that his verdict would come “in good time.”The charges against him could carry between 15 years and life in prison. His health has significantly worsened as he is diabetic, receives limited medical care and has been kept in solitary confinement without air-conditioning in the sweltering Hong Kong heat, his son said.The younger Lai said the last he heard about his father was that he experienced heart palpitations, an episode earlier described by his defense lawyers.- ‘Very real consequences’ -China imposed a draconian security law in Hong Kong in 2020 after massive and at times destructive protests against Beijing swept the global financial hub.Sebastien Lai said that other countries should persuade China that if “go through with this and kill him, essentially, there will be very real consequences” for Hong Kong.”Hong Kong is based on a strong, rigid legal system. That’s why it’s a financial center. Without the strong, rigid legal system, it’s nothing,” he said.Jimmy Lai visited Washington in 2019 to discuss pro-democracy protests with leaders including then-vice president Mike Pence.Prosecutors later pointed to his meetings, calling them a conspiracy to collude with foreign forces to impose sanctions on China and Hong Kong.Trump, in an interview while on the campaign trail last year, said of Lai, “100 percent, I’ll get him out.”Since returning to the White House, Trump has said he will at least try to free Lai. But Trump, long a harsh critic of China, has recently also spoken fondly of his relationship with President Xi Jinping.The younger Lai voiced appreciation for Trump’s efforts but voiced hope for a more outspoken stance by other Western countries, naming France.He praised the stances of Germany as well as Britain, where Jimmy Lai holds nationality and where the younger Lai lives.Sebastien Lai said Britain understood the importance of defending a person who sacrificed himself for democracy.”It doesn’t really get much better than that if you’re going to give someone citizenship.”

A documentary about an Israeli ex-soldier set to premiere at the Toronto film festival — after initially being cut from the schedule — has become the latest flashpoint in Hollywood’s internal split over the Gaza conflict.”The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue,” which charts how retired Israeli general Noam Tibon saved his family and others during the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, is due to screen at North America’s biggest movie festival Wednesday.The Canadian-produced film makes use of actual Hamas bodycam footage of the attacks that resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people in Israel, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official data.A lack of “legal clearance” for this footage was the reason given by organizers for withdrawing the film from the festival’s lineup last month — before it was restored amid outrage over alleged censorship.More than 1,000 entertainment industry figures including Amy Schumer and Debra Messing had signed a petition accusing the festival of silencing Jewish voices.Director Barry Avrich this weekend in Toronto expressed skepticism about the official reason his film had been withdrawn.”To the best of my knowledge, I’ve not known Hamas to have a licensing division,” he told a panel.In a statement, festival organizers said they had found “a resolution to satisfy important safety, legal, and programming concerns,” apologizing for “pain and frustration” caused by its initial response.”I was so proud of the film community in Hollywood that started to really react to this,” Avrich told Deadline.- ‘Deep and angry’ -Yet Hollywood is far from unified.In a New York Times op-ed Monday, veteran entertainment reporter Sharon Waxman wrote that the Gaza conflict “has pitted Hollywood against itself.”For a politically liberal industry which contains a powerful pro-Israel lobby, the issue “remains a third rail, with convictions running deep and angry across the board,” she wrote.Also Monday, over 1,500 actors and film industry workers including Olivia Colman and Mark Ruffalo vowed not to work with Israeli cinema bodies they said were “implicated in genocide” in Gaza, in an open letter.Israeli’s retaliatory campaign has killed at least 64,522 people in Gaza, according to figures from the Hamas-run goverment’s health ministry considered reliable by the United Nations.Elsewhere, the recent Venice film festival began with protests and calls to boycott Israeli actors, and ended Saturday with a gut-wrenching new Gaza film taking second prize.”The Voice of Hind Rajab” recounts the killing of a five-year-old Palestinian girl by Israeli forces in Gaza last year.Blending real audio and video of the Red Crescent’s attempted rescue with dramatic reenactments, it drew backing from Brad Pitt and Joaquin Phoenix.It also prompted “thousands and thousands” of intimidating messages to the filmmakers and producers, director Kaouther Ben Hania told AFP. The movie screened at Toronto Sunday, where Ban Hania said “we need the voice of Hind Rajab to echo across borders” and called for anyone in the audience who can help to evacuate the dead girl’s remaining family from Gaza.- ‘A family, not a country’ -Ahead of Wednesday’s premiere of “The Road Between Us” and possible protests, director Avrich told Deadline he planned to bring his own security team to supplement the festival’s.Toronto police told AFP they had a “strong presence across (the festival)” but declined to detail specific security plans for Wednesday’s premiere. The film itself is described as a documentary in the style of an “action thriller.”It recounts how Tibon “journeyed from Tel Aviv to the Nahal Oz kibbutz seeking to rescue his son,” who is a prominent journalist, and other family members.It uses a combination of new interviews and footage from kibbutz security cameras, as well as multiple Hamas bodycams.Avrich has described Tibon as a real-life hero in the style of Liam Neeson’s “Taken” action films.”He is seen as a man that finally, on that day, showed leadership,” said Avrich.But, he told the Hollywood Reporter, “it’s not really a political film. It’s wrapped in the flag of a family, not a country.”Whether Hollywood views it that way, remains to be seen.

ChatGPT-maker OpenAI is backing the production of a feature-length animated film created largely with artificial intelligence tools, aiming to prove the technology can revolutionize Hollywood filmmaking with faster timelines and lower costs.The movie, titled “Critterz,” follows woodland creatures on an adventure after their village is disrupted by a stranger, with producers hoping to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival in May 2026 before a global theatrical release, they said in statement on Monday.The project has a budget of under $30 million and a production timeline of just nine months — a fraction of the typical $100-200 million cost and three-year development cycle for major animated features.”Critterz” originated as a short film by Chad Nelson, a creative specialist at OpenAI, who began developing the concept three years ago using the company’s DALL-E image generation tool. Nelson has partnered with London-based Vertigo Films and Los Angeles studio Native Foreign to expand the project into a full-length feature.”OpenAI can say what its tools do all day long, but it’s much more impactful if someone does it,” Nelson said in the news release. “That’s a much better case study than me building a demo.”The production will blend AI technology with human work. Artists will draw sketches that are fed into OpenAI’s tools, including GPT-5 and image-generating models, while human actors will voice the characters. The script was written by some of the same writers behind the successful “Paddington in Peru.”However the project comes amid intense legal battles between Hollywood studios and AI companies over intellectual property rights.Major studios including Disney, Universal and Warner Bros. Discovery have filed copyright infringement lawsuits against AI firm Midjourney, alleging the company illegally trained its models on their characters.The film is funded by Vertigo’s Paris-based parent company, Federation Studios, with about 30 contributors sharing profits through a specialized compensation model.Critterz will not be the first animated feature film made with generative AI. In 2024, “DreadClub: Vampire’s Verdict,” considered the first AI animated feature film and made with a budget of $405, was released, as well as “Where the Robots Grow.”Those releases, as well as the original “Critterz” short film, received mixed reactions from viewers, with some critics questioning whether current AI technology can produce cinema-quality content that resonates emotionally with audiences.

A former top security executive at WhatsApp filed a federal lawsuit Monday alleging that parent company Meta systematically violated cybersecurity regulations and retaliated against him for reporting the failures.Attaullah Baig, who served as head of security for WhatsApp from 2021 to 2025, claims that approximately 1,500 engineers had unrestricted access to user data without proper oversight, potentially violating a 2020 US government order that imposed a $5 billion penalty on the company.The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleges that Meta failed to implement basic cybersecurity measures, including adequate data handling and breach detection capabilities.According to the 115-page complaint, Baig discovered through internal security testing that WhatsApp engineers could “move or steal user data” — including contact information, IP addresses, and profile photos — “without detection or audit trail.”The filing claims Baig repeatedly raised concerns with senior executives, including WhatsApp head Will Cathcart and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.Baig alleges he faced escalating retaliation after his initial reports in 2021, including negative performance reviews, verbal warnings, and ultimately termination in February 2025 for alleged “poor performance.”The lawsuit also claims Meta blocked implementation of security features intended to address account takeovers affecting an estimated 100,000 WhatsApp users daily, choosing instead to prioritize user growth.Meta strongly disputed the allegations.”Sadly, this is a familiar playbook in which a former employee is dismissed for poor performance and then goes public with distorted claims that misrepresent the ongoing hard work of our team,” Carl Woog, vice president of communications at WhatsApp, told AFP in a statement.”Security is an adversarial space, and we pride ourselves on building on our strong record of protecting people’s privacy,” Woog added.The company said Baig left due to poor performance, with multiple senior engineers independently validating that his work was below expectations.Meta also noted that the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration dismissed Baig’s initial complaint, finding that Meta had not retaliated against him.The company further insisted that Baig’s self-description as head of security was an exaggeration of his role at WhatsApp, and that he was a lower-level engineer.Prior to joining Meta, Baig worked in cybersecurity roles at PayPal, Capital One, and other major financial institutions. The case adds to ongoing scrutiny of Meta’s data protection practices across its platforms — Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp — which serve billions of users globally.Meta agreed to the 2020 government settlement following the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which involved improper harvesting of data from 50 million Facebook users. The consent order remains in effect until 2040.In his whistleblower complaint, Baig is requesting reinstatement, back pay, and compensatory damages, along with potential regulatory enforcement action against the company.In a separate case targeting Meta first reported by the Washington Post on Monday, current and former employees allege the company suppressed research on child safety risks in its virtual reality products.Meta denies these claims, stating it prioritizes youth safety and complies with privacy laws.

Rupert Murdoch’s children have reached a settlement in the legal dispute over control of the right-wing media mogul’s companies, News Corp and Fox Corp announced Monday.The agreement resolves litigation after siblings had contested Murdoch’s effort to install as successor his son Lachlan, who shares his father’s political orientation. But a Nevada court had blocked the 94-year-old’s effort.The new deal establishes a trust to replace the Murdoch Family Trust that had included Lachlan plus three other Murdoch siblings. Under the agreement, Prudence MacLeod, Elisabeth Murdoch and James Murdoch will receive cash based on equity sales and cease to have holdings in either media company.US media said the value of the settlement would be $3.3 billion, to be split evenly among the three siblings.The eldest daughter, Prudence, has had little involvement in the family business, but James and Elisabeth are known as more politically centrist.”New trusts will be established for the benefit of Lachlan Murdoch, Grace Murdoch and Chloe Murdoch,” said a press release from Fox and News Corp.Meanwhile “the departing beneficiaries” will “cease to be beneficiaries in any trust holding shares in News Corp or Fox Corporation.”- Media transformation -Friction over the future of the holdings — a stable that includes Fox News, The Wall Street Journal and a host of British and Australian media — had been the inspiration for the hit TV series “Succession.”The complicated structure of the trust reflects the colorful familial relationships that shaped Rupert Murdoch’s life as he built the multibillion-dollar empire.The original trust was reported to have been the result of a deal with his second wife — mother of Lachlan, Elisabeth and James — who wanted to ensure her offspring would not be disenfranchised by children Murdoch had with his third wife, Wendi Deng.Murdoch’s daughters with Deng — Grace and Chloe — will be beneficiaries of the new trusts, along with Lachlan.The agreement establishes LGC Holdco, which will own all shares of News Corp and Fox Corp previously held by the original family trust. Voting control for these shares “will rest solely with Lachlan Murdoch through his appointed managing director,” said the press release.The Murdoch empire has transformed tabloid newspapers, cable TV and satellite broadcasting over the last few decades while facing accusations of stoking populism across the English-speaking world.Brexit in Britain and the rise of Donald Trump in the United States are credited at least partly to Murdoch and his outlets.