US adversaries stoke Kirk conspiracy theories, researchers warn
Russian, Chinese, and Iranian state media are exploiting conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination to advance thousands of false claims aimed at undermining the United States and other adversaries, a research group warned Wednesday.Official media in the three countries mentioned Kirk — a close ally of President Donald Trump — 6,200 times since the activist was shot dead last week during a speaking event on a Utah university campus, the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard reported citing data gathered using a social media analytics tool.The assessment comes after the United States eliminated a key government agency that tracked foreign disinformation in April, framing the move as an effort to preserve “free speech,” even as leading experts monitoring propaganda raised the alarm about the risk of disinformation campaigns from US adversaries.NewsGuard’s report echoed recent warnings from Utah Governor Spencer Cox, who cautioned last week that US adversaries were spreading disinformation surrounding Kirk’s killing to inflame political tensions.”What we are seeing is our adversaries want violence,” Cox said.”We have bots from Russia, China, all over the world, that are trying to instill disinformation and encourage violence.”- Capitalizing on crisis -Much of the disinformation originated from Russian state media, which falsely claimed Ukrainian involvement and attempted to link the killing to Kirk’s opposition to American military aid to Kyiv, NewsGuard said.There was no evidence linking Ukraine to the assassination. US authorities have said that a 22-year-old US citizen from Utah named Tyler Robinson allegedly used a rifle to shoot Kirk from a rooftop. He was arrested and has been formally charged with murder.Iranian state media baselessly accused Israel — Tehran’s arch enemy — of orchestrating the killing in retaliation for Kirk’s opposition to a US military strike on Iran, NewsGuard’s report said.They framed the killing as an operation by Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, an unfounded claim that researchers say reflects Tehran’s longstanding pattern of blaming its adversary for major crises.Meanwhile, Chinese outlets spread disinformation about Robinson, baselessly claiming that he donated money to the Trump’s campaign in 2020.”Pro-China commentators used Kirk’s assassination to mock the US and spread false information about the suspect, portraying America as deeply divided,” NewsGuard said.Foreign influence campaigns have frequently used US political crises, elections, or natural disasters to stoke tensions, disinformation experts say.Some researchers warn that the United States may be ill-prepared to confront the rising threat of foreign disinformation.In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio shut down the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI) hub — an agency formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC) — which was responsible for tracking and countering disinformation from foreign actors.Last week, the Financial Times reported that European countries had received a notice from the State Department that it was terminating memoranda of understanding signed last year under Joe Biden’s administration, which had aimed to establish a unified approach to countering disinformation by foreign governments.”The United States has ceased all frameworks to counter foreign state information manipulation and any associated instruments implemented by the former administration,” the State Department said Wednesday, without elaborating.
Jimmy Kimmel show yanked after government pressure on Kirk comments
Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show was pulled from the air Wednesday hours after the US government threatened to cancel broadcasting licenses because of comments the host made about the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.The stunning move by network ABC to remove one of America’s most influential late-night shows was blasted by critics as government censorship, but celebrated by Donald Trump, who has long chaffed at the comedians who mock him.”Great News for America,” he wrote on his Truth Social page.”Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done.”Trump, who also rejoiced in July at the cancellation of Kimmel’s fellow late-night satirist Stephen Colbert, then urged that two other comedians be removed.”That leaves Jimmy (Fallon) and Seth (Meyers), two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!!”In Hollywood, where Kimmel’s show is recorded, audience members were turned away at the door before taping began Wednesday.Tommy Williams, a longshoreman from Florida, told AFP the move felt un-American.”Any show that’s on TV that speaks out against Donald Trump, he’s trying to shut down,” the 51-year-old said.”We’re losing our freedom of speech. This is something that happens in Russia and North Korea and China, state-run TVs stuff.”- FCC threat -The furor comes a week after Kirk, a close Trump ally, was shot dead on a Utah university campus, setting off a bitter battle over responsibility in deeply polarized America, with conservatives — including Trump — blaming “the radical left.”Authorities this week said 22-year-old Tyler Robinson was the lone gunman, and brought a murder charge against him.On Monday, Kimmel spoke about the shooting in his show-opening monologue.”The MAGA gang (is) desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and (doing) everything they can to score political points from it,” said Kimmel, referring to the president’s “Make America Great Again” movement.He then showed footage of Trump pivoting from a question about how he had been affected by Kirk’s death to boasting about the new ballroom he is building at the White House, prompting laughter from the studio audience.”This is not how an adult grieves the murder of somebody called a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” said Kimmel.On Wednesday, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr openly threatened the license of ABC affiliates who broadcast Kimmel’s show.”I think it’s past time these (affiliates) themselves push back… and say, ‘Listen, we’re not going to run Kimmel anymore until you straighten this out because we’re running the possibility of license revocation from the FCC,'” he told right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson.”We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”Hours later, Nexstar, one of the country’s biggest owners of ABC affiliate stations, announced it would be removing the show from its stations.Nexstar is in the middle of a multi-billion dollar merger with a rival that will require FCC approval.ABC — which is owned by Disney — then followed suit, pulling the show nationwide.Kimmel did not immediately comment, and representatives for the entertainer did not respond to AFP queries.- ‘They are censoring you’ -The White House has fired several broadsides against cultural institutions it views as hostile to Trump’s brand of right-wing nationalism.Law firms, universities and the media have all been targeted, including with lawsuits that legal experts say are meritless, but which nevertheless have resulted in huge payments.ABC and Paramount-owned CBS have both coughed up.The settlements — which are to be paid to Trump’s future presidential library — were seen as being motivated by the desire of the news organizations’ parent companies to stay in Trump’s good graces.Democrats were quick to connect the dots on Wednesday.”President Trump and FCC Chair Carr made it clear: fall in line or be silenced,” US Senator Ben Ray Lujan posted on X. “Buying and controlling media platforms. Firing commentators. Canceling shows. These aren’t coincidences. It’s coordinated. And it’s dangerous,” wrote California Governor Gavin Newsom.”They are censoring you in real time.”
Climat: divisée, l’UE essaye de ne pas arriver les mains vides à la COP de Bélem
Divisés sur leur trajectoire climatique en 2040, les pays européens vont tenter jeudi de se mettre d’accord a minima sur un message commun à porter lors de la prochaine grande conférence de l’ONU sur le climat au Brésil en novembre.Faute de mieux, les ministres de l’Environnement vont discuter à Bruxelles d’une simple “déclaration d’intention” sur la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre de l’Union européenne à l’horizon 2035.L’idée serait d’approuver une fourchette de baisse des émissions dans les dix ans qui viennent – entre -66,3% et -72,5% des émissions par rapport à 1990. Puis de préciser la cible quand les 27 auront arraché un compromis sur leur trajectoire 2040.”Cette approche permettrait à l’UE de ne pas arriver les mains vides” à un sommet onusien sur le climat dans une semaine aux Etats-Unis, puis à la COP30 au Brésil en novembre, souligne le Danemark, qui occupe la présidence tournante de l’Union européenne.La présidente de la Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, doit défendre les ambitions climatiques de l’Europe le 24 septembre à New York, en marge de l’Assemblée générale de l’ONU.Le compromis proposé par les Danois est “loin d’être idéal”, mais “c’est la meilleure option” à ce stade, considère Elisa Giannelli, du think tank E3G.Cela “permet à l’Union européenne de sauver la face au niveau international”.- Profondes divergences -Encore faut-il que les 27 donnent leur feu vert jeudi. “Je ne suis pas sûr qu’on y arrivera”, prévient anonymement un responsable européen, qui s’attend à une discussion jusque dans la soirée et conseille de prendre “un sac de couchage”. Bousculée par la poussée de l’extrême droite aux élections européennes de juin 2024, l’UE est beaucoup moins allante sur les enjeux environnementaux que lors du précédent mandat.L’écologie peine à trouver une place dans l’agenda, dans un contexte géopolitique tendu.A ce stade, les Européens n’arrivent pas à surmonter leurs divergences sur la proposition de la Commission européenne de réduire de 90% les émissions de gaz à effet de serre en 2040 par rapport à 1990.Le Danemark et l’Espagne poussent pour, mais des pays comme la Hongrie et la République tchèque sont contre au nom de la défense de leur industrie, et la France reste prudente.La Commission a fait un geste début juillet, en proposant des flexibilités dans le mode de calcul: la possibilité d’acquérir des crédits carbone internationaux, à hauteur de 3% du total, qui financeraient des projets en dehors de l’Europe.Mais cette concession n’a pas suffi.- “Mauvais signal” -La semaine dernière, la France et l’Allemagne ont provoqué la colère des organisations environnementales en réclamant d’abord une discussion entre chefs d’Etat et de gouvernement lors du sommet européen du 23 octobre à Bruxelles.L’Europe est en train d’envoyer “un mauvais signal” et ne “montre pas son leadership en matière d’action climatique”, peste Michael Sicaud-Clyet, de l’ONG WWF.A Bruxelles, le commissaire européen en charge du climat, Wopke Hoekstra, veut croire qu’un compromis est encore possible.”Je suis convaincu que nous parviendrons à régler la question de 2040 avant notre arrivée à Belém”, la ville brésilienne où se tiendra la COP30 du 10 au 21 novembre, affirme-t-il à l’AFP.Avant de se prononcer, les autorités françaises réclament notamment des garanties sur le financement de la décarbonation de l’industrie. Paris critique la méthode de la Commission, qui a lié les échéances 2035 et 2040, quand l’ONU réclamait en février dernier que les pays signataires de l’Accord de Paris publient leur engagements de décarbonation pour 2035 (les “contributions déterminées au niveau national”, les NDC dans le jargon onusien).En temporisant, la France et l’Allemagne s’efforcent aussi de ménager leur opinion publique, alors que l’extrême droite, pourfendeuse de “l’écologie punitive” de Bruxelles, progresse de plus en plus.Aux Nations Unies, on s’inquiète que l’UE perde l’effet d’entraînement qu’elle avait jusqu’ici sur les questions environnementales.La COP30 ne “prend pas la voie d’un sommet magistral” à ce stade et l’Europe pourra se “dédouaner” en disant que les autres pays ne font pas mieux qu’elle, redoute une source onusienne.


