The New York state grand jury weighing criminal charges against Donald Trump over alleged hush money payments during the 2016 election was put on hold, with the jurors on standby to possibly hear at least one more witness on Thursday.
(Bloomberg) — The New York state grand jury weighing criminal charges against Donald Trump over alleged hush money payments during the 2016 election was put on hold, with the jurors on standby to possibly hear at least one more witness on Thursday.
The grand jury’s session was canceled Wednesday after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office alerted court officials to the adjournment, said a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity since it isn’t public.
No reason was given for the delay, but former federal prosecutor Harry Sandick, now in private practice, said Bragg may be taking a moment to reflect.
“It is possible that the DA’s office may want more time to think things through,” Sandick said. “Even if you can prove that a person did all these bad things, you still need to decide whether those bad things amount to a crime.”
Read More: If Trump Is Indicted, This Is What Happens Next
The jurors are investigating whether Trump directed his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen to make payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, who says she had an affair with Trump, ahead of his the election and whether he then concealed the payments. Cohen says he paid Daniels $130,000 for her silence and was reimbursed by the Trump Organization.
‘Real Questions of Law’
Trump, the current Republican front-runner in next year’s presidential race, denies the affair and any wrongdoing and says Bragg’s investigation is a partisan attack by the Democratic DA.
Late Wednesday, Trump defense lawyers Susan Necheles and Joe Tacopina said they sent Bragg’s office a Feb. 2018 letter to the Federal Election Commission in which Cohen’s then-lawyers at declared that he used his “own personal funds” to pay Daniels.
According to the letter, which was also posted by Trump on Truth Social, “neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign were a party to the transaction” nor reimbursed him, the lawyers wrote. The letter also said neither Cohen nor his business made any “in-kind contributions” to Trump’s presidential campaign. Cohen has said Trump later personally repaid him.
“This letter is problematic and is exculpatory,” Tacopina said. “It’s devastating to the credibility of Michael Cohen and we said should be before the grand jury.”
Sandick said “there are some real questions of law, with uncertain answers, about the Trump case that I have no doubt the district attorney’s office is carefully reviewing.”
The grand jury has regularly met on Monday and Wednesday afternoons since Bragg convened it in January.
A spokeswoman for Bragg and a spokesman for New York state court officials declined to comment on the adjournment.
Novel Legal Theory
Bragg may be pursuing a theory that has never been tested, legal experts say. Falsifying business records can be a crime under New York law, but for prosecutors to prove Trump committed a felony, they would have to show he was involved in the falsification to commit or conceal a second crime — in this case, a violation of state election law.
Cohen, a longtime Trump stalwart who once said he would take a bullet for his boss, pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges over the payments and was sentenced to three years in prison. Since then he has become a fierce critic of the former president. He says he has met 20 times with Bragg’s office and testified twice before the grand jury.
Read More: Trump Fixer Cohen Ready for Star Turn Against Old Boss
Trump is also facing a Justice Department investigation of his handling of government documents and his efforts to overturn the 2016 election, and a probe by the Atlanta DA over those efforts, and has called both inquiries political vendettas as well. On Saturday, ahead of what he said was his imminent arrest in Bragg’s probe, he urged his supporters to “protest” and “take our nation back!” Bragg has come under pressure from Republicans over his investigation.
Sandick, the former federal prosecutor, says Wednesday’s pause may just be a matter of legal prudence.
“Sometimes you need to gather all of the evidence before you can make a final decision,” he said.
Read More
- QuickTake: What Trump’s Legal Perils Mean for His 2024 Candidacy
- Bomb Threat Called In to NY Court Where Trump Hearing Held
- What to Know About Indictments Ahead of Possible Trump Charges
–With assistance from Greg Farrell.
(Updates with Trump’s lawyers asking for grand jury to see 2018 Cohen letter)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.