A former HSBC Holdings Plc investment banking associate sued the bank, claiming he faced discrimination over his Jewish faith and his desire to take parental leave, then was fired after he complained about his treatment.
(Bloomberg) — A former HSBC Holdings Plc investment banking associate sued the bank, claiming he faced discrimination over his Jewish faith and his desire to take parental leave, then was fired after he complained about his treatment.
Michael Krantz said the bank violated federal and state civil rights laws by reducing his hours and giving him less attractive assignments after he asked not to work over Jewish holidays. In his complaint filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, Krantz claims he was fired in March after he asked to take a full 12 weeks of parental leave in anticipation of his child’s birth.
Representatives for HSBC didn’t immediately respond to calls and emails seeking comment on the suit.
According to the suit, Krantz joined HSBC as an analyst in August 2021 and was promoted to associate in March 2022. Despite “exemplary” performance, Krantz claims he began to receive less work, reducing his bonus potential, after he requested in September 2021 not to be staffed on a project that would’ve required him to work during Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.
Not Kosher
At the end of 2021, Krantz claims he was the only employee in his cohort not to be given one of his three top choices for group assignment. According to the suit, HSBC “guaranteed” that employees would be given one of their top choices but treated Krantz differently because of his religion.
Krantz said HSBC ignored his request for Kosher food during a breakfast for newly promoted associates. The bank also allegedly held a March 2023 dinner event at a non-Kosher restaurant.
“As a result, plaintiff was required to get his own food at a restaurant that was a 15-minute walk away from the dinner location,” Krantz said in his suit.
According to the suit, a manager told him at the March event that his desire to take 12 weeks of parental leave would be problematic. Krantz said he complained about the pushback to HSBC human resources and was reassured that taking leave wouldn’t affect his standing at the bank.
Krantz said he was told less than three weeks later he was being laid off. According to his suit, he was the only similarly situated associate subject to the layoff.
The case is Krantz v HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., 23-cv-8059, US District Court, Southern District of New York.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.