A former Deutsche Bank AG risk manager testified at Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial that he made decisions on hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to the real estate mogul for years based in part on financial statements that the New York attorney general has already proved were wildly inflated.
(Bloomberg) — A former Deutsche Bank AG risk manager testified at Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial that he made decisions on hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to the real estate mogul for years based in part on financial statements that the New York attorney general has already proved were wildly inflated.
James “Nicholas” Haigh, who had the final say on loans to some of the bank’s wealthiest US clients, including the former president, is the first witness affiliated with the German lender to testify in the trial, now in its second week. Haigh has been a banker for decades and left Deutsche Bank in 2018. He took a position with Bank of America Corp. and is now retired.
Kevin Wallace, a deputy attorney general, asked Haigh in Manhattan state court on Wednesday if he made any assumptions about the annual financial statements that the Trump Organization presented to his team starting in 2011.
“I assumed the representations of the assets and liabilities were broadly accurate,” Haigh testified. He didn’t weigh in on whether he believed Trump had been dishonest, as the state alleges.
The trial, in a suit brought last year by New York Attorney General Letitia James, is one of six Trump faces as he seeks to return to the White House in the 2024 election, including in four criminal prosecutions. The Republican front-runner denies wrongdoing and says all the cases are part of a “witch hunt.”
Read More: What Trump’s Many Legal Perils Mean for His 2024 Bid
Haigh is one of six current and former Deutsche Bank employees who are potential witnesses in the state’s case. Trump’s longtime family banker, former Deutsche Bank Managing Director Rosemary Vrablic, will testify later. The Frankfurt-based lender decided to cut ties with Trump following the deadly riots at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
James, a Democrat, alleges Trump and his Manhattan-based company used the inflated asset valuations to reap a total of $250 million in “illegal profit” from cheaper loans and insurance policies from 2011 to 2021. Before the trial started, the judge overseeing the case ruled Trump is liable for fraud, based on the strength of the evidence alone. He’s now listening to testimony on the state’s six remaining claims as well as penalties.
During the cross examination of Haigh, Trump attorney Jesus M. Suarez suggested the bank wasn’t duped because his bankers did their own calculations of Trump’s net equity, which they determined was less than the amount he’d claimed in financial statements.
“Most of the time that involves actual appraisals, this may be more of a sanity check on numbers,” Haigh said. “But also, we, the bank, hadn’t done all of the due diligence one would do, in the sense of the opinion of value that you would see in an appraisal.”
Trump and his two sons who are named in the suit, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, will also testify at some point during the trial, appearing on the witness lists for both sides. Ivanka Trump, who was dismissed from the suit by an appeals court in June, appears on the state’s list.
Read More: Trump’s Business Empire at Risk of Dissolution After Ruling
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.