Elizabeth Holmes must report to prison as scheduled on April 27, a judge ruled, rejecting her request to remain free on bail as she appeals her fraud conviction.
(Bloomberg) — Elizabeth Holmes must report to prison as scheduled on April 27, a judge ruled, rejecting her request to remain free on bail as she appeals her fraud conviction.
The decision Monday by US District Judge Edward Davila in San Jose, California, is likely his last in the case which he’s handled since Holmes was indicted in 2018. Davila presided over the Theranos Inc. founder’s four-month trial in 2021 and sentenced her in November to serve 11 1/4 years of incarceration for deceiving investors in her blood-testing startup.
Legal experts said Holmes’s bid to remain free during an appeals process that might take two years was a long shot. She’s expected to make one final request for bail from the San Francisco-based federal appeals court, which she has also asked to overturn her conviction.
Davila ruled that even if Holmes won an appeals court ruling faulting him for allowing evidence at trial challenging the accuracy and reliability of Theranos’ technology, she had deceived investors in so many different ways that such a decision isn’t likely to require a reversal or new trial on all the fraud counts she was convicted of.
“Whether the jury heard more or less evidence that tended to show the accuracy and reliability of Theranos technology does not diminish the evidence the jury heard of other misrepresentations Ms. Holmes had made to investors,” he wrote.
Holmes stands little to no chance at the appeals court, said Seth Kretzer, a criminal defense lawyer not involved in the case. Davila made her conviction “bullet-proof” by giving her lawyers wide latitude to make her full defense, which is why her trial took so long, he said.
To justify her request for bail, Holmes said she has two young children, continues to work on new inventions, and has raised “substantial questions” of law or facts in her appeal that could win her a new trial. At a hearing last month, Davila was most interested in an argument prosecutors made that there’s a risk Holmes might try to flee, based on a one-way plane ticket to Mexico for her that was purchased while she was on trial.
Holmes’s lawyer explained that she and her partner Billy Evans planned a trip to attend a wedding with hopes that she’d be acquitted and could relax for an extended vacation with no defined return date.
Ultimately the plane ticket didn’t factor into Monday’s ruling.
“Booking international travel plans for a criminal defendant in anticipation of a complete defense victory is a bold move, and the failure to promptly cancel those plans after a guilty verdict is a perilously careless oversight,” Davila said of the plane ticket. The incident invited “greater scrutiny” of Holmes, he wrote, adding that he concluded the purchase “while ill-advised, was not an attempt to flee the country.”
Lance Wade and Kevin Downey, lawyers representing Holmes, didn’t immediately respond to emails outside regular business hours seeking comment on the ruling.
Read More: Elizabeth Holmes Makes Plea to Put Off Prison as She Appeals
Davila previously denied a request for bail pending appeal sought by Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, the former president of Theranos and Holmes’s ex-boyfriend who was sentenced to 13 years in prison for his fraud conviction. The appeals court upheld Davila’s decision.
The case is USA v Holmes, 18-cr-00258, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).
(Updates with prison report date and legal expert’s comment on appeal)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.