AFP USA

A medical panel appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted Thursday to recommend a new preventive shot against RSV, a common respiratory illness that is the leading cause of hospitalization for infants in the United States.The vote marked the first by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) since Kennedy dismissed all members of the influential group of independent experts and replaced them with his own nominees, a move that made this decision a test of the new panel’s intentions.Clesrovimab was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a shot for newborns and young babies experiencing their first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season.Marketed under the name Enflonsia by its manufacturer Merck, the antibody immunization shot was shown in clinical trials to be safe and effective at significantly reducing RSV infections and hospitalizations among infants.The ACIP panel was asked to adjudicate the next step after approval — namely, whether it should now be recommended for infants under eight months old entering their first RSV season who are not already protected by an RSV vaccine administered to their mother during pregnancy.They voted 5-2 in favor.The two dissenters were Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at MIT who has questioned the safety of Covid-19 vaccines, and Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse and member of the anti-vaccine National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).”I don’t feel this is ready to be administered to all healthy babies. I think we should take a more precautionary approach,” said Levi, explaining his “no” vote.Pebsworth did not offer comments, but the NVIC previously opposed the earlier-approved RSV antibody, nirsevimab.Kennedy — who spent decades spreading vaccine misinformation before becoming President Donald Trump’s top health official — abruptly fired all 17 members of the ACIP earlier this month, accusing them of conflicts of interest.

A newly appointed US medical panel voted Thursday to oppose the use of a vaccine ingredient long targeted by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over debunked claims it causes autism.Thimerosal, a preservative that prevents bacterial and fungal contamination in multidose vials, has been extensively studied, with authorities including the World Health Organization finding no evidence of harm beyond minor injection-site reactions.Although the substance is now rarely used in US vaccines, the recommendations by the influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices alarmed experts, who say the move has effectively embedded talking points championed by the anti-vaccine movement into national policy.Kennedy — who spent decades spreading vaccine misinformation before becoming President Donald Trump’s top health official — abruptly fired all 17 ACIP members earlier this month, accusing them without evidence of conflicts of interest.Across three votes, his new panelists recommended that thimerosal be removed from influenza vaccines for children, pregnant women and finally all adults.Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth University and the lone voice of dissent, said: “The risk from influenza is so much greater than the nonexistent risk as far as we know from thimerosal,” adding that he was worried about the decision’s global impact.Although 96 percent of US flu vaccines in the 2024-2025 season did not contain thimerosal, the preservative remains important in lower income countries because they are more likely to use lower cost multidose vials that must be punctured repeatedly, raising the risk of contamination.Thimerosal contains an artificial form of mercury called ethylmercury that is cleared from the body far more quickly than the form of the chemical found in nature. US manufacturers voluntarily removed it from most pediatric vaccines in 2001.- ‘Platform for anti-vaccine talking points’ -“The fact that it’s being brought up again — something that’s already been adjudicated — shows how the ACIP is becoming a platform for anti-vaccine talking points to come back to life long after most of us thought they’d been put to rest,” Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease specialist at Johns Hopkins University, told AFP.Ahead of the vote, Lyn Redwood, a nurse and former leader of the anti-vaccine group Children’s Health Defense, which Kennedy once chaired, was invited to present arguments against thimerosal. A previous version of her slideshow, which was posted online before the meeting, was removed without explanation after it was found to contain a fabricated citation.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had prepared a rebuttal to Redwood’s presentation, but it was removed from the meeting website. Robert Malone, a new panel member known for spreading misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic, including promoting the antiparastic drug ivermectin to treat the virus, said the CDC document had not been approved by the Office of the Secretary.”We now have a CDC ACIP that is voting based on vibes from an embarrassingly bad presentation from an external speaker,” Jeremy Faust, an emergency physician and editor-in-chief of MedPage Today, told AFP. “Taking thimerosal out of the few vaccines it’s in won’t change anything other than give credence to discredited notion. That will undermine confidence in vaccines, not improve it.”

The Trump administration went on the offensive against the media Thursday over coverage of strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, insisting the operation was a total success and berating journalists for reporting on an intelligence assessment that raised doubts.American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles.President Donald Trump “created the conditions to end the war, decimating — choose your word — obliterating, destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said during a news conference at the Pentagon, referring to a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran.Trump himself has called the strikes a “spectacular military success” and repeatedly said they “obliterated” the nuclear sites.But US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months — coverage sharply criticized by Hegseth and others.”Whether it’s fake news CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times, there’s been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment,” Hegseth said.The document was “leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn’t successful,” he said.Trump — who has also personally slammed coverage of the intelligence report, calling for journalists to lose their jobs — on Thursday accused Democrats of leaking the assessment and said they should be prosecuted.- ‘Get a big shovel’ -White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt meanwhile told journalists that the Iran strikes were “one of the most successful operations in United States history,” and joined Trump in lashing out personally at CNN’s Natasha Bertrand — one of the reporters who broke the story on the preliminary assessment.Bertrand has been “used by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to push fake and false narratives,” Leavitt said.CNN has issued a statement saying it stands behind the journalist and her reporting.In his remarks Thursday morning, Hegseth did not definitively state that the enriched uranium and centrifuges at the heart of Iran’s controversial nuclear program had been wiped out. He cited intelligence officials as saying the nuclear facilities were destroyed, but gave little detail.”If you want to know what’s going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel, because no one’s under there right now,” he said, referring to the deep-underground nuclear site.Among the officials cited by Hegseth was US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said the previous day that “Iran’s nuclear facilities have been destroyed.”He also referred to a statement by CIA chief John Ratcliffe, who pointed to a “historically reliable and accurate” source of information indicating that “several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to end the country’s nuclear program, which Tehran says is for civilian purposes but Washington and other powers insist is aimed at acquiring atomic weapons.Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action.The US operation was massive, involving more than 125 US aircraft including stealth bombers, fighters and aerial refueling tankers as well as a guided missile submarine.

Magazine legend Anna Wintour stepped down as editor of US Vogue on Thursday after 37 years in which she was often hailed as the single most influential figure in the fashion world.Wintour, 75, was famous for making Vogue’s front covers an authoritative monthly statement on contemporary fashion, and for her total control over the glamorous pages inside.She will no longer run day-to-day editing of the fashion bible, but magazine group owner Conde Nast was quick to scotch suggestions that she was retiring.She will continue to hold senior roles at the group and as Vogue’s global editorial director, a company source said.British-born Wintour came to wider public renown as the inspiration for “The Devil Wears Prada,” a hit 2003 novel and 2006 movie, in which Meryl Streep played the role of a tyrannical magazine editor.Wintour, who took the helm at US Vogue in 1988, announced at a staff meeting in New York that the publication would seek a new head of editorial content, several US media reported.- Global magazine -She was made a British dame in 2017 and in February this year was made a companion of honour, joining a select group never numbering more than 65 recognized for major contributions in their field.At the ceremony in London in February, Wintour removed her trademark sunglasses to receive the award and said she had told King Charles III that she had no plans to stop working.Wintour, who was raised in the UK by a British father and an American mother, reigned over Vogue in the heyday of glossy magazines.She took the title global, with huge budgets to spend on models, design, photographs and journalism funded by lavish advertisements and high subscription rates.Wintour was known for axing work without discussion, and was a fixture in the front row at catwalk shows with her unchanging bob haircut.A 2015 documentary about her life pointed to her ice queen image and steely ambition but also revealed her warmer human side.As Conde Nast’s chief content officer, she will continue to oversee publications including Vogue, Wired, Vanity Fair, GQ, Conde Nast Traveler and Glamour.

It will go down as the summit where US President Donald Trump learned to stop worrying and love NATO.Trump reveled in gushing praise from leaders in The Hague — including being called “daddy” by alliance chief Mark Rutte — and a pledge to boost defense spending as he had demanded. But it went further than just lapping up flattery. Trump also spoke of what sounded like an almost religious conversion to NATO, after years of bashing other members as freeloaders and threatening to leave.”I came here because it was something I’m supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit differently,” Trump said at his closing press conference on Wednesday.”I watched the heads of these countries get up, and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I’ve never seen quite anything like it. “It was really moving to see it.”A day after returning to the White House, Trump still sounded uncharacteristically touchy-feely about his time with his 31 NATO counterparts. “A wonderful day with incredible and caring Leaders,” he posted on his Truth Social platform on Thursday.- Turnaround -It was a remarkable turnaround from the US president’s first term.Trump repeatedly berated allies as not paying up and threatened to pull the United States out of NATO as part of his wider disdain for international institutions and alliances.At his first summit in 2017 in Brussels, Trump memorably shoved aside Montenegro’s prime minister Dusko Markovic as he made his way to the front of the stage.A year later Trump publicly lambasted Germany and privately talked about wanting to quit.But this time NATO leaders had carefully choreographed the trip. They massaged the numbers to give Trump the defense spending deal he craved. And while Trump headed to the summit dropping F-bombs in frustration at a shaky Iran-Israel ceasefire, NATO leaders love-bombed him from the moment he arrived. The Netherlands put him up overnight in the Dutch king’s royal palace and gave him a royal dinner and breakfast — “beautiful,” according to Trump — while NATO organizers kept the summit deliberately short.Frederick Kempe, the chief executive officer of the Atlantic Council, said Trump had “waxed poetic” about NATO in a way he had never done before.”Trump — the vilifier of European deadbeats on defense and crusader against allies for what he sees as unfair trade practices — sounded like an altered man,” he said in a commentary.- ‘Daddy’s Home’ -The question now is what it means for NATO when the alliance’s priorities end up guided by one man.The final summit statement’s language on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was watered down from previous years. It also made no mention of Ukraine’s push to join NATO.Reporters were not allowed into Trump’s meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The move was partly because of their Oval Office bust-up in February, but it also deprived Zelensky of the set-piece he had craved.”The biggest loser was Ukraine,” said Ed Arnold of the Royal United Services Insitute in London.Trump also hinted at what lies in store for any backsliders on the defense spending pledge, threatening to make Spain “pay” on trade over its resistance to commit to the new target.As with any relationship, the pressure will now be on NATO to keep up the first flush of love over the three summits that are due to take place over the rest of Trump’s second term.”The real worry is that NATO will be unable to keep up the hype,” said Arnold.For now, though, Trump and his administration seem to be content. As he arrived back in Washington, the White House posted a video of summit highlights, with the caption: “Daddy’s Home.”

Sean “Diddy” Combs used “power, violence, and fear” as the head of a decades-old criminal enterprise, a prosecutor said Thursday in closing arguments in his high-profile trial.”He counted on silence and shame to keep his crimes hidden,” Christy Slavik told the jury as the government began wrapping up its case against the once-powerful music mogul.The 55-year-old Combs was seated behind the prosecutor as she delivered her closing arguments, passing an occasional message to his lawyers.Slavik methodically walked the jury through the charges against Combs, which include racketeering and sex trafficking. “He used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,” she said, and relied on a network of “loyal lieutenants” — none of whom testified at his trial — to cover up his crimes, which included forced labor, bribery and witness tampering.”He became more powerful and more dangerous because of the support of his inner circle and his businesses,” she said. “This is Mr Combs’s kingdom.”Slavik told the jury the case was not about criminalizing unorthodox sex.”It’s not about free choices at all,” she said.The women involved were “drugged, covered in oil, sore, exhausted” as Combs made them have sex with escorts for hours, she said.The famed producer coerced two women — the singer Casandra Ventura and later a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane — into years of drug-addled sex with paid escorts, prosecutors say.- Potential life sentence -The most serious charge, racketeering — which includes the existence of a criminal enterprise that committed a pattern of offenses — could send Combs to prison for life.He faces two charges of sex trafficking and two more for transportation for purposes of prostitution.Combs denies it all. His lawyers have argued that the artist’s relationships were consensual and have sought to convince jurors that many of the witnesses who testified were doing so for financial gain or jealousy.Along with alleged victims, government witnesses included former assistants and other employees, as well as escorts, friends and family of Ventura, and a hotel security guard who said he was bribed with $100,000 in a paper bag.Combs opted against testifying on his own behalf, a common strategy of defense teams who are not required to prove innocence, only to cast doubt on government allegations of guilt.The government’s evidence included thousands of pages of phone and text records, and hours of testimony involved meticulous readings of some of the most explicit and wrenching exchanges.Many of those records appear to indicate distress on the part of the alleged victims. But a lot of the messages also show affection and desire — texts the defense underscored again and again.- Sex parties -Jurors have seen video evidence of the sex parties prosecutors say were criminal, while the defense has exhibited exchanges they say imply consent.Also in evidence are reams of financial records — including CashApp payments to escorts — as well as flight and hotel records.Since early May the proceedings have gripped the Manhattan federal courthouse where they’re taking place. And though electronics are barred from the building, dozens of influencers and content creators have buzzed around the courthouse’s exterior every day, delivering hot takes to eager social media fans.Combs is incarcerated and does not enter or exit the courthouse publicly. But some of the high-profile attendees and witnesses do, including members of the music mogul’s family and figures like Kid Cudi, the rapper who testified that Combs’s entourage torched his car.The closing arguments by the prosecution are expected to wrap up on Thursday and the defense is likely to start its closing on Friday.The jury of 12 New Yorkers could get the case as early as Friday afternoon.

For Alejandro Barranco, a Marine veteran, it’s difficult to process the way his father, a Mexican gardener, was detained in a raid in California as part of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown in the United States.”They handled this situation in a very unprofessional manner. These are not the standards of the United States government,” Alejandro said in an interview with AFP.Narciso Barranco, father of three Marines, was intercepted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents Saturday while trimming a garden at a restaurant in Santa Ana, a city south of Los Angeles. The incident was captured by witnesses in videos that spread like wildfire on social media. From different angles, Barranco, 48, is seen running with a weed whacker in hand before several agents beat, subdue and pepper-spray him. “It’s very hard to watch,” said Alejandro, 25.Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement to AFP that Barranco tried to flee and “brandished a weed whacker directly at an officer’s face,” so officers took appropriate action. McLaughlin added that they used “the minimum amount of force necessary to resolve the situation in a way that prioritized the safety of the public and our officers.”But Alejandro disputes the claims. “The video shows (Narciso) moving the weed whacker. I think it’s natural instinct because he was sprayed with something seconds before…but he never brandished it directly at an officer,” he said. “There’s a guy holding his gun sideways, finger on the trigger pointing at a vehicle. I don’t see how that makes sense. The minimum amount of force doesn’t include restraining a man and repeatedly hitting him in the neck and face areas. I think that’s the maximum amount of force short of lethal force.” – ‘Swallowing orders’ -The case has sparked criticism in California, in part because Barranco’s three sons are in or have been in the United States Marine Corps. Alejandro has left the military, while two brothers are stationed at Camp Pendleton, also in Southern California.The arrest also occurred amid a tense climate in the Democratic state, with protests against the raids, and where Trump sent thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines to support immigration operations among other things. Alejandro says he knows these troops and understands that they are “swallowing orders” and doing their job. “I do feel that some of them are suffering. Some are confused because perhaps some of their relatives are undocumented and they see all this, and I think it’s hard for them.” Trump returned to the White House riding an anti-immigration wave and promising to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, whom he called “criminals” and “the worst of the worst.” However, under pressure from immigration authorities to increase daily arrests, street operations have shaken workplaces such as car washes, hardware stores and street vendors. Activists, non-governmental organizations and families denounce the detention of people without criminal records, identified for staying or entering the United States illegally. The case of Narciso Barranco, who emigrated from Mexico in the 1990s, follows that of the wife of another former Marine in Louisiana, who was detained in May after leaving an immigration appointment to process her legal status. – ‘There has to be a change’ -Alejandro saw his father for the first time on Tuesday at a detention center in downtown Los Angeles.He told AFP that his father is being held in a cell with at least 70 other people, with only one toilet, very little food, and “minimal water, like once a day.”Narciso, with wounds and bruises, received medical attention Tuesday night, Alejandro said, adding that his father hasn’t been able to wash and still has blood on his shirt, the same one he was wearing when he was arrested.”There needs to be a change,” Alejandro said in a calm but sad tone, referring to Trump ‘s immigration policy. “They’re taking away workers who came here to make this country even greater.”They came to give their children a good education and teach them to serve, to give back, and to be grateful for this country, as my brothers and I are.”  

The US Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for states to potentially cut off funding for Planned Parenthood, one of the country’s largest abortion providers.Planned Parenthood is already barred from receiving federal money for abortion care but the 6-3 ruling would also allow states to cut off reimbursements for other medical services it provides to low-income Americans under the Medicaid program.The three liberal justices on the top court dissented.The case stems from an executive order issued by South Carolina’s Republican governor Henry McMaster in 2018 cutting off Medicaid funding to the two Planned Parenthood clinics in the state.The Medicaid reimbursements were not abortion-related, but McMaster said providing any funding to Planned Parenthood amounts to a taxpayer “subsidy of abortion,” which is banned in South Carolina for women who are more than six weeks pregnant.Planned Parenthood, which provides a wide range of reproductive health services, and a South Carolina woman suffering from diabetes, filed suit against the state arguing that Medicaid patients have the right to receive care from any qualified provider.An appeals court ruled that Planned Parenthood cannot be excluded from the state’s Medicaid program and South Carolina appealed to the Supreme Court, where conservatives wield a 6-3 majority.The court ruled that a Medicaid patient cannot sue the state to receive medical care from a provider of their choosing.Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent joined by the two other liberal justices, disagreed.”Congress enacted the Medicaid Act’s free-choice-of-provider provision to ensure that Medicaid recipients have the right to choose their own doctors,” Jackson said. “Today’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people.”The Supreme Court ruling was welcomed by the anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, which called it a “major win for babies and their mothers.”It clears the way for South Carolina and other states “to stop funding big abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood in their Medicaid programs,” it said on X.Paige Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, called the ruling a “grave injustice” and said it “promises to send South Carolina deeper into a health care crisis.”The Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark 1973 case that established federal protections for abortion access, in June 2022. Since then, more than 20 of the 50 US states have imposed strict limits on abortion, or even outright bans.

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused US President Donald Trump on Thursday of exaggerating the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, in his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel took hold.In a televised speech, Khamenei hailed what he described as Iran’s “victory” over Israel, vowed never to yield to US pressure and insisted Washington had been dealt a humiliating “slap”.”The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration,” Khamenei said, rejecting US claims Iran’s nuclear programme had been set back by decades.The strikes, he insisted, had done “nothing significant” to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.Trump, however, maintained the US attacks were devastating.The US president said key facilities, including the underground Fordo uranium enrichment site, had been “obliterated” by American B-2 bombers.Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump dismissed speculation Iran might have removed enriched uranium prior to the raid, saying: “Nothing was taken out… too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!”He added that satellite images showed trucks at the site only because Iranian crews were attempting to shield the facility with concrete.Khamenei dismissed such claims, saying “the Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America”.His remarks followed the end of a 12-day war between Iran and Israel — the deadliest between the two countries to date.Both sides have claimed victory: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a “historic win”, while Khamenei said Iran’s missile retaliation had brought Israel to the brink of collapse.- US defence -In Washington, the true impact of the strikes has sparked sharp political and intelligence debates.A leaked classified assessment suggested the damage to Iran’s nuclear programme may be less severe than initially claimed — possibly delaying progress by only a few months.This assessment contrasts with statements from senior US officials.CIA Director John Ratcliffe said several facilities would need to be “rebuilt over the course of years”.Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth accused the media of misrepresenting the operation.He said the United States used massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs on Fordo and another underground site, while submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted a third facility.”President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating — choose your word — obliterating, destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” Hegseth said.Doubts remain about whether Iran quietly removed some 400 kilograms (880 pounds) of enriched uranium from its most sensitive sites before the strikes — potentially hiding nuclear material elsewhere in the country.- Netanyahu says Iran ‘thwarted’ -Following waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since mid-June, the US bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities.Initial intelligence reports, first revealed by CNN, suggested the strikes did not destroy critical components and delayed Iran’s nuclear programme only by months.Experts questioned if Iran had pre-emptively moved enriched uranium to protect it. The US administration has forcefully rejected such suggestions.Trump described the attack as having “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear facilities, including the Fordo site, which is buried inside a mountain, and claimed it had set back the program by “decades”.The Israeli military said it delivered a “significant” blow to Iran’s nuclear sites but cautioned it was “still early” to fully assess the damage.Netanyahu said Israel had “thwarted Iran’s nuclear project”, warning any attempt by Iran to rebuild it would be met with the same determination and intensity.- Nuclear talks? -Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Al Jazeera that “nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that’s for sure”.After the war derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope “for a comprehensive peace agreement”.Trump told reporters Israel and Iran were “both tired, exhausted”, before going on to say that talks were planned with Iran next week.”We may sign an agreement. I don’t know,” he added.Iran has consistently denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its “legitimate rights” to the peaceful use of atomic energy.It has also said it is willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington.The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran’s health ministry said.Iran’s attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli figures.A state funeral will be held on Saturday in Tehran for top commanders and nuclear scientists killed in the war.burs-dv/kir

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Thursday that American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were a success, backing President Donald Trump and berating the media for covering an intelligence report that questioned the results of the operation.American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles.”President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating — choose your word — obliterating, destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon, referring to a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran.Trump has called the strikes a “spectacular military success” and repeatedly said they “obliterated” the nuclear sites.On Thursday, he insisted that Iran did not manage to move nuclear materials — including enriched uranium — ahead of the US military action.”Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform.However, US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months — coverage sharply criticized by Hegseth.”Whether it’s fake news CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times, there’s been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment.”The document was “leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn’t successful,” Hegseth said.Trump has also lashed out at coverage of the intelligence report, calling for journalists to lose their jobs.- ‘Get a big shovel’ -Hegseth did not definitively state that the enriched uranium and centrifuges at the heart of Iran’s controversial nuclear program had been wiped out, but cited intelligence officials — although giving little detail — as saying the nuclear facilities were destroyed.”If you want to know what’s going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel, because no one’s under there right now,” Hegseth said, referring to the deep-underground nuclear site.Among the officials cited by Hegseth was US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said the previous day that “Iran’s nuclear facilities have been destroyed.”He also referred to a statement by CIA chief John Ratcliffe that said: “A body of credible intelligence indicates Iran’s nuclear program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes.”Ratcliffe pointed to a “historically reliable and accurate” source of information indicating that “several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi, speaking Thursday on French radio, meanwhile said Iran’s uranium-enriching centrifuges had been knocked out.”Given power of these (bombs) and the characteristics of a centrifuge, we already know that these centrifuges are no longer operational,” Grossi said.Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to end the country’s nuclear program, which Tehran says is for civilian purposes but Washington and other powers insist is aimed at acquiring atomic weapons.Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action.The US operation was massive, involving more than 125 US aircraft including stealth bombers, fighters and aerial refueling tankers as well as a guided missile submarine.