AFP USA

US president Andrew Jackson famously reacted to an unfavorable ruling by the Supreme Court chief justice with the defiant rejoinder: “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”Nearly 200 years later, the United States teeters on the brink of a constitutional crisis as the administration of President Donald Trump — faced with a series of court setbacks to his aggressive right-wing agenda — flirts with open defiance of the judiciary.Trump has said he will abide by court rulings and appeal those he disagrees with, but he also recently posted on Truth Social a quote attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte: “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”Vice President JD Vance and designated cost-cutter Elon Musk, on the other hand, seem to be inviting a clash between the executive and the judiciary.”If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,” Vance posted on X this month.Same thing if a judge tries to command the attorney general, he said, adding: “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”Musk has called for the impeachment of judges he accuses of blocking his sweeping cuts to the federal workforce and government programs.”If ANY judge ANYWHERE can block EVERY Presidential order EVERYWHERE, we do NOT have democracy, we have TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY,” the billionaire said in a post on X.White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has also weighed in.”The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch,” Leavitt said, accusing judges in “liberal districts” of “abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump’s basic executive authority.”Leavitt’s comments are in line with a conservative legal doctrine known as the “unitary executive theory” under which the president holds the sole authority over the executive branch.The theory could meet its ultimate test in the Supreme Court, where conservatives hold a 6-3 majority.- ‘Power grab’ -Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, accused Trump and Musk of “pursuing a power grab that — if left unchecked — will leave the federal courts impotent and Congress a museum piece.”Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, said a constitutional crisis occurs when one of the three co-equal branches of government — the legislature, the executive and the judiciary — attempts to exercise the power of another branch.The United States has faced constitutional crises before, most notably when southern states seceded from the Union, precipitating the 1861-65 Civil War.Another was when Jackson, America’s seventh president, defied the Supreme Court order to stop the military from removing members of the Cherokee Nation from their land in Georgia.Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said there is no universally accepted definition of a constitutional crisis.”Some think we’re already in one,” Schwinn said. “Others say it’s if and when the president openly defies the Supreme Court.”I think we’re fast approaching a crisis with the administration seemingly openly defying court orders to re-start USAID funding,” he said.- ‘Dangerous suggestions’ -Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts warned of the danger of ignoring court rulings in a year-end letter in December that may prove to be even more prescient than he intended at the time.”Elected officials from across the political spectrum have raised the specter of open disregard for federal court rulings,” Roberts wrote. “These dangerous suggestions, however sporadic, must be soundly rejected.”The conservative chief justice noted that every administration suffers court defeats — sometimes in cases with major ramifications for executive or legislative power.”Nevertheless, for the past several decades, the decisions of the courts, popular or not, have been followed,” he said.What happens next is anybody’s guess.The courts do have some tools at their disposal if their orders are being defied, Tobias said, including civil and criminal contempt, possible fines and threats of imprisonment.At the end of the day, however, “the courts rely on the good-faith compliance of other constitutional actors with the rule of law,” Schwinn said.”If there’s no such good-faith compliance, there’s little the courts can do.”

Five former US defense secretaries on Thursday addressed a letter to lawmakers denouncing as “reckless” the recent firings of senior Pentagon officials by President Donald Trump.Trump this month launched a sweeping shakeup of the US Defense Department, firing top officers and moving to lay off thousands of civilian workers, pushing the Pentagon into the political spotlight.Democrats have accused Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of seeking to politicize the military and ensure it is led by people personally loyal to the president. In the letter, the ex-defense secretaries, who served under both Republican and Democratic administrations, added their voices to the condemnation, saying they were “deeply alarmed” by the firings. “We write to urge the U.S. Congress to hold Mr. Trump to account for these reckless actions and to exercise fully its Constitutional oversight responsibilities,” the letter said. The letter was signed by the most recent defense chief under Trump’s Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin, as well as William Perry, Chuck Hagel, Leon Panetta and James Mattis, who served in Trump’s first administration. “Mr. Trump’s dismissals raise troubling questions about the administration’s desire to politicize the military and to remove legal constraints on the President’s power,” the five men wrote. “President Trump’s actions undermine our all-volunteer force and weaken our national security.” Remaining above the political fray is a core principle for the US armed forces, with troops even barred from engaging in some types of political activity to maintain the military’s neutrality. Trump administration officials have defended the firings, with Hegseth insisting the president is simply choosing the leaders he wants, saying, “Nothing about this is unprecedented.” No accusations of misconduct have been made against the recently removed officials, including top officer General Charles “CQ” Brown, who was less than two years into his four-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Since taking office in late January for his second term, Trump has instigated rapid, broad cuts to US federal agencies. The Defense Department — the largest employer in the United States — said last week it would soon start cutting its civilian workforce by at least five percent.

A list of 29 suspects extradited to the United States on Thursday reads like a “Who’s Who” of Mexico’s imprisoned drug lords. Here are three of the most notorious cartel kingpins who were handed over:- Rafael Caro Quintero -The biggest prize was without doubt Rafael Caro Quintero, who has been wanted by the United States for decades over the kidnap, torture and murder of Drug Enforcement Administration special agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena in 1985.The 72-year-old “Narco of Narcos,” who has always denied he was behind the killing, was on the FBI’s list of 10 most-wanted fugitives until he was captured in Mexico in 2022.There was a $20 million reward for information leading to his arrest — the most Washington has ever offered for a Mexican drug trafficker.His handover was an “extremely personal” moment for the entire DEA, the agency’s acting administrator Derek S. Maltz said.Caro Quintero had already been arrested in 1985, tried in Mexico and sentenced to 40 years in prison for Camarena’s murder.But in 2013, a Mexican court ordered his release on a legal technicality after he served 28 years, a move that angered US authorities.By the time Mexico’s Supreme Court overturned the decision, Caro Quintero had already gone into hiding.Caro Quintero is said to have begun growing marijuana at the age of 14.He went on to co-found the now-defunct Guadalajara cartel — which did business with the late Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar — before running an arm of the infamous Sinaloa cartel.Reputed to have had a weakness for jewelry and fine clothing, he cited his impoverished childhood to justify his actions.”I was an orphan, my father died, I was 14 years old and I had to feed my brothers, that’s how it all started,” he told Proceso magazine in a 2016 interview.- Miguel Angel Trevino Morales -As head of the Zetas drug cartel, Miguel Angel Trevino Morales, alias “Z-40,” led one of Mexico’s most powerful and feared organized crime groups until its collapse.The group was founded by deserters from the Mexican special forces known for their brutality.Originally, they acted as the armed enforcers of the Gulf Cartel, but the two groups split in 2010, and the Zetas became a major drug trafficking organization in their own right.The split sparked brutal turf wars in the north of the country.At the time of his arrest in 2013, officials described Trevino Morales, now 54, as a brutal killer who liked to “stew” his enemies by plunging them in containers of oil and fuel that he would set on fire.The US government had offered $5 million for information leading to his capture.- Omar Trevino Morales -Omar Trevino Morales, alias “Z-42,” allegedly took over the Zetas after his older brother Miguel Angel was captured by marines in the northeastern state of Tamaulipas in July 2013.He was considered “one of the most dangerous and bloodthirsty criminals in Mexico,” Tomas Zeron, the investigations chief at the attorney general’s office, said at the time.In 2010, Omar Trevino Morales told an informant that he had killed more than 1,000 people while his brother Miguel had killed 2,000, according to an affidavit filed in a US court for a case involving another Trevino brother in Texas.Like his brother, he had a $5 million US bounty for information leading to his arrest.Now 51, he was caught in 2015 by Mexican police and soldiers in an upper-class suburb of the northern industrial city of Monterrey.Washington accuses the two brothers of being “personally responsible” for committing dozens of murders and for directing killings, kidnappings and torture.

Hundreds of scientists and experts have been fired from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a leading US agency responsible for weather forecasting, climate analysis, marine conservation and more, a Democratic lawmaker said Thursday.The cuts come as Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency enacts sweeping reductions to the federal workforce — moves that critics argue may exceed legal authority.NOAA has been a prime target for conservative ideologues behind Project 2025, a blueprint for governing that President Donald Trump’s new administration appears to be following. The plan, developed by the Heritage Foundation, describes NOAA as one of the “main drivers of the climate change alarm industry” and calls for dismantling the agency. It also seeks to privatize the National Weather Service, leaving weather forecasting in the hands of companies like AccuWeather.”Hundreds of scientists and experts at NOAA just received the news every federal worker has been dreading,” Congressman Jared Huffman of California wrote in a statement.”Musk’s sham mission is bringing vital programs to a screeching halt. People nationwide depend on NOAA for free, accurate forecasts, severe weather alerts, and emergency information,” added Huffman, who is the second most powerful member of the House Natural Resources Committee.”Purging the government of scientists, experts, and career civil servants and slashing fundamental programs will cost lives.”A NOAA spokesman said the agency would not comment on internal personnel matters.”We continue to provide weather information, forecasts and warnings pursuant to our public safety mission,” Theo Stein, the spokesman, told AFP.Environmental advocates expressed concern at the move.”Trump’s mass firings at NOAA are an act of sabotage aimed at one of our most important federal agencies,” said Miyoko Sakashita, the Center for Biological Diversity’s oceans director.She added that gutting the agency “will hamstring essential lifesaving programs that forecast storms, ensure ocean safety, and prevent the extinction of whales and sea otters.”Trump has reappointed meteorologist Neil Jacobs to lead NOAA, despite his role in the “Sharpiegate” scandal during Trump’s first term. Jacobs, who led the agency from 2018 to 2021, was officially censured for bowing to political pressure and misleading the public about a hurricane forecast.The controversy erupted in 2019 when Trump falsely claimed Hurricane Dorian would hit Alabama. After the National Weather Service corrected him, Trump doubled down, displaying a doctored forecast map altered with a Sharpie. NOAA later issued an unsigned statement backing Trump, sparking backlash. Official investigations castigated Jacobs for his involvement in the statement.

The two films could hardly be more different: a raucous, rip-roaring indie about a sex worker, and an elegant, big-studio drama set in the Vatican.But “Anora” and “Conclave” appear to be locked in a tight two-horse race to win best picture at the Oscars on Sunday.With a twisty awards season rocked by Los Angeles wildfires and a racist tweet scandal reaching its climax, the battle for Hollywood’s ultimate prize is too close to call.”I don’t think anyone can honestly tell you,” said The Hollywood Reporter’s awards expert Scott Feinberg.”Both sides are feeling more nervous than confident… that should be an indicator that this is really a nail-biter,” he told AFP.Sean Baker’s “Anora” — about a New York exotic dancer who weds a wealthy Russian playboy, only to learn that her dream marriage is a nightmare illusion — is the year’s most awarded film to date.The low-budget indie won the Cannes festival’s Palme d’Or last May, and has accrued top prizes from Hollywood directors, producers, writers and critics.But “Conclave” — a film about the secretive and cutthroat election of a new Catholic leader, lent an uncanny timeliness by the real-life Pope Francis’s ailing health — appears to have won over many late voters.Released by NBCUniversal’s prestige label Focus Features, with an impeccable A-list cast led by Ralph Fiennes, it earned top honors from Britain’s BAFTAs, and the Hollywood actors’ SAG Award for best cast.Almost every surprise best picture Oscar winner in recent times — from “Shakespeare in Love” and “Crash” to “Parasite” and “CODA” — first won the top SAG prize, said Feinberg.”I personally put ‘Conclave’… it’s just more of a traditional, classic ‘best picture’ film,” one Oscars voter told AFP.The voter, anonymous because Academy members cannot reveal their picks, also expressed admiration for “The Brutalist,” a saga about a Hungarian Jewish architect making a new life in the post-WWII United States.- Oscar records -Adrien Brody, who plays the titular gifted architect and Holocaust survivor in “The Brutalist,” has been the presumed favorite to win best actor for months. Brody has won the prize previously, for 2002’s “The Pianist.” If he prevails again, he’d join an elite club of double winners including Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson.But Timothee Chalamet earned wide admiration for his pitch-perfect performance as a sardonic young Bob Dylan in “A Complete Unknown,” won the Screen Actors Guild Award over Brody, and could prove a spoiler.At just 29, he arguably has the most star power of any of this year’s nominees, and would beat Brody’s record as the category’s youngest-ever winner.Brody is “still the safer pick,” said Feinberg — assuming enough Academy voters made it through his film’s three-and-a-half-hour runtime.Several fellow Academy members “were upset that they were locked in a room for that amount of time,” said the Oscars voter.- ‘Comeback story’ -There could be an even younger winner on the actress side, if a groundswell of support for “Anora” carries its star Mikey Madison, 25, to the Oscars stage.But she will have to get past Demi Moore, the 1990s megastar who had enjoyed a sparkling career renaissance thanks to gory body horror flick “The Substance.””Hollywood loves a comeback story,” said the Oscars voter.It seems that neither woman need fear their fellow nominee Karla Sofia Gascon, of musical narco-thriller “Emilia Perez.”Gascon, the first openly trans acting nominee, saw her hopes collapse after years-old racist tweets about Islam, China and American George Floyd, a Black man who died at the hands of US police in 2020, went viral.The controversy also sunk Netflix’s chance of its first best picture win, though co-star Zoe Saldana remains the favorite to win for best supporting actress.Best supporting actor appears to be similarly locked. Kieran Culkin has won almost everything going this year for his portrayal of a charismatic but troubled cousin on an ancestral road trip through Poland in “A Real Pain.”- ‘Wicked’ stars -The ceremony itself, hosted by Conan O’Brien on his Oscars debut, is expected to be an emotional affair.It will honor firefighters who battled blazes that killed at least 29 people and devastated Los Angeles in January.Hoping to capitalize on a recent ratings uptick — last year’s gala featured a memorable “Barbie”-themed musical showstopper — producers have enlisted “Wicked” stars Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo to perform.For the first time, the gala will stream live on Hulu, as well as on US network ABC, and in more than 200 territories worldwide.The 97th Oscars begin Sunday at 4:00 pm (0000 GMT Monday).

Mexico on Thursday extradited some of its most notorious imprisoned drug lords to the United States in a bid to avert sweeping tariffs, including a cartel kingpin wanted for decades over the murder of a US undercover agent.Rafael Caro Quintero, who allegedly ordered the kidnap, torture and killing of DEA special agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena in the 1980s, and several other top gang figures were among 29 suspects handed over.Caro Quintero was on the US Federal Bureau of Investigation’s list of 10 most-wanted fugitives until his capture in 2022. If convicted, he and several others could face the death penalty, the US Department of Justice said, adding that prosecutors would also consider terrorism charges.The surprise extraditions come as Mexico scrambles to seal a deal with Washington to avoid being hit with trade duties that Trump has linked to illegal migration and drug flows.Trump has designated eight Latin American drug trafficking organizations — including six Mexican cartels — terrorist organizations.”As President Trump has made clear, cartels are terrorist groups, and this Department of Justice is devoted to destroying cartels and transnational gangs,” US Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement.”We will prosecute these criminals to the fullest extent of the law in honor of the brave law enforcement agents who have dedicated their careers — and in some cases, given their lives — to protect innocent people from the scourge of violent cartels,” she added.The handover of so many suspects at the same time was “historic,” Mike Vigil, a former chief of international operations at the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), told AFP.In the past, Mexico would extradite only a few suspects at once, he said, adding: “They’re certainly hoping that it will have a positive impact on the tariff negotiations.”The DEA was “celebrating” Caro Quintero’s extradition in particular, he said.DEA acting administrator Derek S. Maltz called it an “extremely personal” moment for the entire agency.The suspects also included the former leaders of the ultra-violent Zetas cartel, brothers Omar and Miguel Angel Trevino Morales.Former Juarez cartel boss Vicente Carrillo and a brother of Nemesio Oseguera, head of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, one of Mexico’s most powerful criminal organizations, were also on the list.- ‘National security threat’ -The announcement came as a high-level Mexican delegation, including the foreign, defense and security ministers, visited Washington for talks with counterparts, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.The two countries agreed to take an unspecified “series of coordinated actions” to tackle drug trafficking, the Mexican government said.The aim was to reduce fentanyl deaths as well as the illegal trafficking of firearms, it said.Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has pledged to collaborate with Washington, while rejecting any “invasion” of her country’s sovereignty.She has repeatedly expressed optimism that tariffs between the two countries can be avoided, and said Thursday she hoped to speak to Trump to seal a deal.Shortly after taking office, Trump announced duties of up to 25 percent on Mexican imports, citing illegal immigration and the flow of fentanyl.He issued a last-minute suspension until March 4 after Sheinbaum agreed to deploy 10,000 more troops to the Mexico-US border to tackle illegal migration and drug smuggling.Trump signed an executive order on his first day back in the White House in January saying that the cartels “constitute a national security threat beyond that posed by traditional organized crime.”The move has raised speculation about possible military action against the cartels — something that Sheinbaum has said she would oppose.Last week, Sheinbaum confirmed that the United States had been operating drones spying on Mexican cartels as part of a collaboration that has existed for years.Mexican authorities have recently announced a series of major drug seizures and the arrest of two prominent members of the Sinaloa Cartel, which was among the groups designated terrorist organizations by Trump.

Meta on Thursday said it had laid off 20 workers for leaking information to the media, as the social media giant faces pressure over the recent political shift of its boss Mark Zuckerberg towards US President Donald Trump.”We tell employees when they join the company, and we offer periodic reminders, that it is against our policies to leak internal information, no matter the intent,” a Meta spokesperson said, confirming a story first reported in The Verge.”We recently conducted an investigation that resulted in roughly 20 employees being terminated for sharing confidential information outside the company, and we expect there will be more,” the company added. “We take this seriously, and will continue to take action when we identify leaks.”The round of firings came following a recent series of reports based on Zuckerberg’s meetings with employees.In one meeting, first reported by The Verge, Zuckerberg told employees he would no longer be forthcoming with information because “we try to be really open and then everything I say leaks. It sucks.”He also warned them to “buckle up” for the coming year and said that Meta would be a productive partner with the White House.Tech leaders have broadly fallen in line around Trump since he won the election in November, with Zuckerberg making a particular turn towards the Republican since his return to office.Zuckerberg has multiplied his advances towards Trump, who last summer threatened the tech tycoon with life imprisonment after Meta excluded the president from Facebook in January 2021 for encouraging the assault on the Capitol.The CEO and founder has dined with the Republican on several occasions, donated to the president’s inauguration fund, eased up on content moderation, and ended Facebook’s US fact-checking program in an effort to draw closer to the new Republican leadership in Washington.His longtime political affairs boss was also replaced by a prominent Republican, and he named Trump ally Dana White to his board after the US election.The measures align with the conservative views of the president and his allies, as well as masculinist entertainers and personalities like Elon Musk.On the Joe Rogan podcast, Zuckerberg complained that “a lot of the corporate world is pretty culturally neutered” and that embracing masculine energy “is good.”

Apple unveiled Thursday a series of initiatives aimed at enhancing safety for children and teens using its devices, as it fends off calls that it more directly check the age of its users.The changes came amid growing legislative pressure in US states, including Utah and South Carolina, which have proposed bills requiring app store operators to verify children’s ages by uploading official documents and obtain parental consent before minors download apps.In a notable shift, Apple will introduce a new Declared Age Range function that will allow developers to access age information volunteered by parents during an Apple child account setup. This approach represents a compromise between Apple’s historical stance of pushing age verification on app creators and the position of companies like Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, that app stores should handle verification.The two tech behemoths, as well as Google which owns the Android operating system, have bitterly fought over the issue as big tech companies face increasing parental frustration on harmful content reaching children and teens.Under the new system, which was announced in a paper published by Apple, the company said it was also streamlining the creation of child accounts, which are mandatory for users under 13 and optional for those up to 18. Parents can now select their child’s age range during setup and verify their status already on file with Apple.In the Apple app store itself, product pages for third-party apps will feature additional information to guide parents, including details about user-generated content, advertisements, and available parental controls.Apple said some features are already available in the latest operating system updates, with the complete rollout of the age rating system and other features expected later this year.In response to the update, a Meta spokesperson told AFP the move was “a positive first step,” but added it did not go far enough.”Parents tell us they want to have the final say over the apps their teens use, and that’s why we support legislation that requires app stores to verify a child’s age and get a parent’s approval before their child downloads an app,” the company said.

US President Donald Trump’s threat to strip oil giant Chevron of a license to operate in Venezuela could plunge the troubled South American nation into deeper economic and social turmoil, experts say.Chevron currently produces and exports almost a quarter of the million barrels per day from Venezuela, the country with the world’s largest known oil reserves.The company had only resumed Venezuela-US exports in 2022 after a sanctions exemption granted by Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden.At the time, the world was in the midst of an energy crisis sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro had pledged to allow fair elections. It is a promise much of the world, including Trump, considers Maduro to have broken. So what are the implications of Trump’s decision to revoke Chevron’s license to operate in Venezuela?- For Venezuela -Experts say the loss of Chevron-linked exports could spell recession and an even greater number of people fleeing the country.For the government, it would immediately dry up already sparse foreign reserves — a loss of some $150-200 million per month.Energy expert Francisco Monaldi of Rice University in Texas told AFP “the hit to cash flow will undoubtedly have macroeconomic impacts.”Leonardo Vera, an economist at the Central University of Venezuela, said the loss of Chevron would mean that “a modest growth scenario for this year could turn into a recessive and highly inflationary one.”It’s not difficult to imagine how bad things could get. Between 2014 and 2021, Venezuela’s GDP fell by 80 percent, thanks in part to low oil prices and biting US sanctions.During Trump’s first term and his policy of “maximum pressure” Venezuela’s oil production had reached its lowest point in decades, just 400,000 barrels per day in 2020 — a return to 1934 levels. Twelve years earlier, the petrostate was producing 3.5 million barrels per day, with the United States as its main client.The economic and political turmoil has already forced nearly eight million Venezuelans — about a quarter of the population — to flee the country.- For the United States -Jorge Rene Pinon of the University of Texas’s Energy Institute said there would be “no major change” for consumers in the United States, which will likely easily replace Venezuelan imports with those from Canada or elsewhere.One big winner could be Venezuela’s leftist ally and fellow US sanctions target Cuba.Prioritizing cash from US exports, Venezuela’s crude deliveries to Cuba had recently dropped to about a fifth of what they once were.”Now you are going to see some of those barrels going to Cuba,” said Pinon.Under previous rounds of sanctions, Venezuela had been able to shift exports to major economies such as China and India, albeit at lower prices — so Beijing and New Delhi could benefit too.But with Chevron out in the cold, it is not clear the struggling PDVSA can keep up production solo.- Can it be undone? -“There is some uncertainty about which licenses are cancelled and what they might be replaced with,” said energy analyst Rachel Ziemba.Chevron’s licence was last renewed on February 1, and remains valid for six months to August 1.This leaves “time to negotiate” with the Trump administration, said Monaldi.Trump has linked the move to his vow to deport some 600,000 Venezuelans from the United States.In announcing the revocation of Chevron’s license, Trump said Caracas had not been taking back its nationals “at the rapid pace that they had agreed to.”This causes some to believe there may yet be room to negotiate.”It may be like what Trump did with Colombia or like he did with Mexico,” exerting pressure “so that Maduro yields to what he wants,” said Monaldi.

US President Donald Trump held out the prospect of a “great” post-Brexit trade deal that could avoid tariffs on Britain Thursday — as he hailed Prime Minister Keir Starmer as a tough negotiator.”We’re going to have a great trade agreement, one way or the other,” Trump told reporters during a joint press conference with Starmer at the White House, adding that a new deal could come together “rather quickly.” Pro-Brexit politicians dangled the promise of a US-UK trade deal as one of the benefits of leaving the European Union ahead of the 2016 referendum on EU membership. But they failed to agree a deal following the vote. Billionaire property tycoon Trump, who authored a book called the “Art of the Deal,” hailed former human rights lawyer Starmer’s negotiating skills during the press conference.”You’re a very tough negotiator — I’m not sure I like that, but that’s ok,” Trump joked.Asked if Starmer had managed to persuade him to drop the threat of tariffs, the US president chuckled and said: “He tried. he was working hard, I’ll tell you that.””He earned whatever the hell they pay him over there,” he added.Since taking office, Trump has threatened to impose sweeping tariffs against trading partners with whom the United States has a large trade deficit, including the European Union and China. Trump’s comments on a deal signal that his administration is keen to revive the trade talks with Britain, which made little progress during his predecessor Joe Biden’s term in office.Starmer said he had had a “productive discussion” with Trump, adding that the United States and Britain were now working on a new “economic deal.” “We could very well end up with a real trade deal where the tariffs wouldn’t be necessary,” Trump told reporters, adding that the eventual deal could be “really terrific for both countries.”On Thursday, Starmer defended Britain’s trade balance with the United States, calling it “fair, balanced and reciprocal.”