AFP USA

Klimt portrait becomes second most expensive artwork sold at auction

A portrait by Austrian artist Gustav Klimt fetched $236.4 million in New York on Tuesday, becoming the second most expensive artwork ever sold at auction. Six bidders battled for 20 minutes over the “Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer,” which Klimt painted between 1914 and 1916. The piece depicts the daughter of Klimt’s main patron dressed in a white imperial Chinese dress, standing before a blue tapestry with Asian-inspired motifs. Sotheby’s, which managed the sale, did not disclose the identity of the buyer. The most expensive painting ever sold at auction remains the “Salvator Mundi,” attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, which was bought for $450 million in 2017. “Full-length society portraits of this impressive scale and from Klimt’s pinnacle period (1912-17) are exceptionally rare; the majority in major museum collections,” Sotheby’s said of Tuesday’s sale. “The painting offered this evening was one of only two such commissioned portraits remaining in private hands,” it added in a statement. Several other works from Klimt were auctioned at the same event, including “Flowering Meadow” for $86 million and “Forest Slope at Unterach am Attersee” for $68.3 million — both part of the collection of Estee Lauder cosmetics heir Leonard Lauder, who died earlier this year. In total, 24 lots from the Lauder collection generated $527.5 million.For Klimt, the past auction record for his work was held by “Lady with a Fan,” which sold for 85.3 million pounds ($108.8 million) in London in 2023. Another notable auction on Tuesday saw Italian provocateur Maurizio Cattelan’s solid gold toilet go for $12.1 million, and was sold to a famous American brand, according to Sotheby’s.An earlier version of the luxe latrine, titled “America,” was stolen in 2019 from a castle in England. Though it was never recovered — and likely was melted down for cash — three men were convicted in connection with the theft.On Thursday, a self-portrait by Frida Kahlo has a chance of setting a record for a female artist when it goes on sale, also at Sotheby’s in New York. Estimated at $40 to $60 million, the 1940 piece called “The Dream (The Bed)” shows the Mexican painter sleeping in a bed overshadowed by a large skeleton. The most expensive painting by a female artist sold to date is a 1932 work by American Georgia O’Keeffe, which fetched $44.4 million in 2014. The record for Frida Kahlo is another self-portrait from 1949, “Diego and I,” which sold for $34.4 million in New York. 

South Africa to host G20 summit boycotted by US

South Africa will host the G20 summit this weekend, aiming to secure commitments on debt relief for developing countries and to tackle global inequalities as the United States boycotts the event.US President Donald Trump, who has clashed with South Africa over its G20 agenda, is skipping the summit amid a wider US retreat from multilateralism that has rattled global order.President Cyril Ramaphosa told reporters ahead of the November 22-23 event that the US absence is “their loss”.The United States is the most powerful of the 19 countries in the G20, which represents 85 percent of global GDP and about two-thirds of the world’s population, and also includes the European Union and the African Union.The US boycott echoes Trump’s decision not to send an official delegation to the COP30 summit in Brazil.The Republican leader has also withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, an international treaty to limit global warming and has imposed unilateral tariffs on a host of trading partners.South Africa, in particular, has been slapped with a 30 percent tariff from the United States.Trump has also singled out the sub-Saharan nation over a number of issues since he returned to the White House in January, notably claiming falsely that white Afrikaners were being systematically “killed and slaughtered” in the country.- Debt, disaster financing -South Africa’s G20 theme of “Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability” focuses on supporting developing countries through debt relief and financing measures to cope with disasters caused by climate change.It was branded “anti-American” by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in February, when he skipped one of the first meetings of G20 ministers.South Africa says debt is a priority because repayments limit investments in essentials such as infrastructure, healthcare and education.Between 2021 and 2023, Africa spent $70 per capita on debt interest payments, more than on education or health which were at $63 and $44 per capita respectively, according to the United Nations.Ramaphosa will also push for the creation of an “International Inequalities Panel”, modelled after the IPCC for climate change, to tackle massive global inequality that is particularly stark than in South Africa.A report for the G20 from a team led by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz labelled wealth inequality as a global crisis that threatens democracy and social cohesion, saying it should be confronted with the same urgency as the climate crisis.”If adopted, it would mark a significant win not just for Pretoria’s presidency, but for the millions across the Global South whose voices are often sidelined in elite economic forums,” said Tendai Mbanje, a researcher at the the University of Pretoria’s Centre for Human Rights.- Consensus? -It is unclear if South Africa’s G20 presidency will manage to secure a consensus and release a joint final declaration on the issues discussed.Delegates involved in preparatory work said Argentina’s representatives have been obstructive. President Javier Milei — a Trump ally — is also boycotting the event.In the absence of the United States, China’s representative Premier Li Qiang is expected to advocate for multilateralism.”Economic globalisation and multipolarity are irreversible,” Li said at a Asian regional summit in October.Russia will be represented by President Vladimir Putin’s economic advisor and deputy chief of staff, Maxim Oreshkin, in the notable absence of Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.The summit is set to begin the day after the scheduled conclusion of COP30 in Belem, Brazil, whose final negotiations could influence discussions in Johannesburg.It marks the end of a cycle of G20 presidencies by Global South countries, following Indonesia in 2022, India in 2023 and Brazil in 2024.The next to take the baton is the United States.Washington has already announced its intention to narrow the G20’s focus to issues of economic cooperation at the December 2026 meeting to be held at a Miami golf course owned by the Trump family.

Ronaldo and Musk attend Trump’s dinner with Saudi prince

Portuguese soccer superstar Cristiano Ronaldo and billionaire Elon Musk were among the guests at a lavish White House dinner hosted by US President Donald Trump for the visiting Saudi crown prince on Tuesday.Ronaldo plays for Saudi club Al Nassr, one of a number of aging players who have been attracted to the desert kingdom’s heavy spending on stars despite its rights record.The 40-year-old, whose contract with the Saudi club ends this summer, took his place near the head of Trump’s table a few seconds before the president and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman entered.”You know, my son is a big fan of Ronaldo,” Trump said in his pre-dinner speech, adding that his soccer-mad son Barron, 19, got to meet the legendary player. “I think he respects his father a little bit more now, just the fact that I introduced you.”Ronaldo was not the only soccer-related dinner guest, as FIFA chief Gianni Infantino made yet another appearance at the White House ahead of the 2026 World Cup, which the United States is co-hosting.Ronaldo says next year’s World Cup — for which Portugal booked their place on Sunday — will “definitely” be his last.Also at the black-tie dinner was Space X and Tesla tycoon Musk, in a sign that the rift between the president and the world’s richest man has healed after their fiery public divorce. South African-born Musk spent five months as head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and accompanied Trump on a trip to Saudi Arabia in May. But the relationship collapsed in July after Musk criticized Trump’s so-called “big, beautiful” spending bill and then said that the president was in investigatory files relating to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.Trump responded by threatening Musk with deportation.Musk, wearing a tuxedo, was seen chatting to fellow guests at a candlelit table — although a different one from Trump’s.During the dinner Trump also praised the Saudi prince as a “man of leadership,” having earlier defended his royal visitor over the 2018 murder of dissident Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Auction of famed CIA cipher shaken after archive reveals code

It is one of the world’s most famous unsolved codes whose answer could sell for a fortune — but two US friends say they have already found the secret hidden by “Kryptos.”The S-shaped copper sculpture has baffled cryptography enthusiasts since its 1990 installation on the grounds of the CIA headquarters in Virginia, with three of its four messages deciphered so far.Yet K4, the final passage, has kept codebreakers scratching their heads. The sculptor Jim Sanborn, 80, has been so overwhelmed by guesses that he started charging $50 for each response.In August, Sanborn announced he would auction the 97-character solution to K4 as he no longer had the “physical, mental or financial resources” to maintain the code.In a sign of wide interest in Kryptos, which has inspired cultural figures including “The Da Vinci Code” author Dan Brown, the code’s solution is on course to fetch more than $240,000 in a sale due to end this Thursday. So when two friends announced in October they had uncovered the last message held by Kryptos (“hidden” in ancient Greek), it invoked fury and concern from the auction house and Sanborn.Jarett Kobek, a writer from Los Angeles, told AFP how the pair came across the code after he noticed a reference to Washington’s Smithsonian Institution, where Sanborn held his archives, in the auction catalog. He asked his friend Richard Byrne, who is based in the US capital, to take a look through the files.”I took images of all the coding stuff in the files,” said Richard Byrne, a journalist and playwright.A few hours later, Kobek called him and said “Hey, you might have found something interesting,” he recalled.Using Byrne’s photos and clues previously shared by Sanborn, Kobek unraveled the K4 message.- Legal threats -The two men decided to write to Sanborn to share their discovery — but instead of congratulations, they were met by alarm.Sanborn, the pair said, asked them to sign non-disclosure agreements in exchange for a share of the money raised in the auction.”The NDA is a total non-starter,” Kobek said. “You are running an auction where what you are selling is intellectual property exclusivity.””If I take money from that sale, I feel like this would almost certainly make me party to fraud.”They later went public with their discovery in a New York Times piece in October.Sanborn, explaining his communication with the men, wrote in a public letter: “I was trying to save K4 from disclosure by any means possible. I had succeeded for 35 years after all.”Kobek said the pair were keen to avoid disrupting the K4 auction. “The last thing anyone wants to do is take money from an 80-year-old artist,” he said.Even if they have no intention of revealing the code’s solution, the two men say the auction house has sent them cease-and-desist letters.Sanborn has acknowledged his error in archiving the crucial information — but he downplayed the discovery.He said the pair had “found and photographed five pieces of scrambled texts that I had accidentally placed in the archive boxes all those years ago.””The scrambled plain text was found, but without the coding method or the key. This is a very important distinction,” he separately told a news conference in November.And, he added, the discovery does not end the mystery of Kryptos.K5, with a “similar but not identical” coding system to K4, is also to be released after the current auction sale. 

In blow to Trump, US court tosses redrawn Texas congressional map

A US district court, in a setback for President Donald Trump, struck down a congressional map on Tuesday redrawn by Republicans in Texas that was intended to give the party five more likely seats in the House of Representatives.The court ruled that the new map, which weakened five Democratic districts, could not be used in the 2026 midterm elections, where Republicans are seeking to safeguard their slim majority in the House.Democrats are eyeing a big win that would allow them to challenge the Republican president for the rest of his term.The court said the redrawn map, which was challenged by Black and Hispanic voters, amounted to illegal racial gerrymandering.In a split 2-1 decision, the court ordered Republican-ruled Texas to use a 2021 map for next year’s congressional midterm vote.The decision, which Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott said he would appeal to the conservative-majority Supreme Court, is the latest development in a congressional redistricting battle between Republicans and Democrats playing out nationwide.Democratic-ruled California, in response to the move in Texas, voted earlier this month to redraw its own congressional districts to favor Democrats, potentially gaining up to five more House seats.That move has been challenged in court by the Republican Party of California in a lawsuit that has received the backing of the Trump administration.Republicans in Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio have also moved to create more Republican-leaning congressional districts in their states.US electoral districts are traditionally drawn following the national census to reflect population numbers. The next census is not scheduled until 2030.But Republican-ruled Texas, under pressure from Trump, decided to redraw its congressional maps mid-decade to yield more Republican districts.Republicans currently hold a narrow five-seat majority in the House. They also have a majority in the Senate, preventing Democrats from mounting meaningful opposition to Trump.District Judge Jeffrey Brown, in the 160-page ruling striking down the Texas redistricting, said “the public perception of this case is that it’s about politics.””To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map,” Brown wrote. “But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.”Partisan gerrymandering is allowed in the United States but crafting congressional districts on the basis of race is considered unlawful.- ‘Brazen’ -Brown, a Trump appointee, was joined in the opinion by a district judge appointed by Democratic president Barack Obama. A judge appointed by Republican president Ronald Reagan dissented.Gene Wu, the leader of the Democratic minority in the Texas state House of Representatives, welcomed the court ruling.”A federal court just stopped one of the most brazen attempts to steal our democracy that Texas has ever seen,” Wu said in a statement.”Greg Abbott and his Republican cronies tried to silence Texans’ voices to placate Donald Trump, but now have delivered him absolutely nothing.”The Texas governor said the state would “swiftly” lodge an appeal with the Supreme Court.”The Legislature redrew our congressional maps to better reflect Texans’ conservative voting preferences –- and for no other reason,” Abbott said in a statement. “Any claim that these maps are discriminatory is absurd.”Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Trump administration expects Texas to triumph at the Supreme Court, where conservatives have a 6-3 majority.”We strongly disagree with today’s district court ruling on Texas’s redistricting map — Texas’s map was drawn the right way for the right reasons,” Bondi said on X.

‘Piggy.’ ‘Terrible.’ Trump lashes out at female reporters

Donald Trump ripped into a reporter from the US network ABC News on Tuesday, just days after calling another woman journalist “piggy” after she asked a question related to the convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein.Trump threatened ABC’s broadcast license after reporter Mary Bruce posed questions during a White House visit by Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.The earlier incident involving Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey happened a few days ago on Air Force One, but only came to light on social media on Tuesday.”Quiet. Quiet, piggy,” Trump said to Lucey on Friday, pointing his finger at her, after she asked him why he would not release material on disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein “if there’s nothing incriminating in the files.”CNN journalist Jake Tapper called Trump’s “piggy” comment “disgusting and completely unacceptable.”On Tuesday, Trump singled out ABC News’s Bruce after she asked a series of questions in the Oval Office as the US president hosted the de facto Saudi ruler in a high-profile event.Bruce first asked questions about whether dealings by Trump’s family business with the Saudis were a conflict of interest.She then quizzed Prince Mohammed over the 2018 murder of dissident Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, saying “US intelligence concluded that you orchestrated the brutal murder of a journalist, 9/11 families are furious that you are here in the Oval Office. Why should Americans trust you?”Trump cut in angrily, saying: “ABC fake news. One of the worst in the business.”- ‘No more questions’ -The president then said he has “nothing to do” with the Trump organization, which is currently run by his two eldest sons and which announced a deal with a Saudi developer for a resort in the Maldives on Monday.Trump also backed Prince Mohammed’s denial of involvement in the Khashoggi murder, despite US intelligence suggesting he approved the operation. “You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that,” Trump snapped.Trump boiled over again when Bruce later asked about the flashpoint issue of Epstein. Congress voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to order the release of files about the financier, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.”It’s not the question that I mind. It’s your attitude. I think you are a terrible reporter,” Trump shot back at Bruce.Trump said he had “nothing to do” with Epstein and repeated his claim that the scandal is a “hoax.”And “your crappy company is one of the perpetrators,” he told her.Trump urged the head of the US broadcast regulator — who has previously threatened ABC over its content — to “look at” taking away its license.He then pointed at Bruce: “No more questions from you.”

What are the ‘Epstein Files’?

The “Epstein Files,” sealed for years and the object of frenzied speculation, are one step closer to being released to the public.Both the US House of Representatives and Senate moved Tuesday to order the release of government files related to the investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.The wealthy and well-connected financier died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking underage girls.But his death did nothing to staunch the furor over his connections with high-profile business executives, celebrities and politicians, including former close friend President Donald Trump.So what exactly are the Epstein Files?- Epstein Files -The Epstein Files refer to the reams of evidence amassed by the Justice Department and FBI during a probe in Florida that led to his 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution and the investigation that led to his later indictment in New York.Only a sliver of the government material has ever been released publicly, and a slew of revelations about Epstein in recent days comes from email traffic surrendered by his estate.The Epstein Files Transparency Act passed by the House and Senate calls for the release within 30 days of “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” in the possession of the Justice Department, the FBI and US attorneys’ offices related to Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting underage girls for Epstein.She was the only person convicted in connection with the disgraced financier, but Trump’s MAGA supporters have held as an article of faith for years that “deep state” elites were protecting Epstein associates in the Democratic Party and Hollywood.- The FBI/DOJ memo -The FBI and Justice Department triggered a political furor in July with the release of a memo stating that after an “exhaustive review” there would be no further disclosures of evidence from the investigative files on Epstein.The FBI/DOJ memo said there was “no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions” or had a “client list.”Epstein personally “harmed over one thousand victims,” the FBI and DOJ said, but “we did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”Digital searches of Epstein’s electronic devices and physical searches of his various properties, which included a private Caribbean island, had yielded a “significant amount of material, including more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence,” the memo said.- Trump and Epstein -Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to release the Epstein files and could have done so at any time since taking office without congressional intervention.But Trump changed his mind about releasing the files after entering the White House in January and only backed their disclosure this week after it became clear that Congress was going to vote for their release.Before reversing course, the Republican president ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to open an investigation into connections between Epstein and leading Democrats, including former president Bill Clinton.Clinton, like Trump, was once close to Epstein but neither man has been accused of any wrongdoing.Bondi immediately assigned the task to a prosecutor in New York and the move could potentially complicate the release of some of the material in the files or cause it to be heavily redacted.The House bill allows the withholding of material that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.”

US Congress orders Epstein files release after Trump U-turn

US lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Tuesday for releasing government files on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after President Donald Trump dropped his opposition to opening the books on a scandal that has roiled politics, law enforcement and the country’s elite.The president had put allies in Congress under intense pressure not to make the material public, but the Republican leader threw in the towel over the weekend as it became clear that much of his party was poised to defy him.Congress approved the Epstein Files Transparency Act almost unanimously — compelling publication of unclassified documents detailing the investigation into the disgraced financier’s operations and jailhouse death, which was ruled a suicide.Lawmakers say the public deserves answers in a case with over 1,000 alleged victims.Trump says the files will expose powerful Democrats’ connections to Epstein, but the president himself faces uncomfortable scrutiny over his years-long friendship with the man alleged to have supplied underage girls to rich and influential men.The bill passed the House earlier Tuesday with just one dissenter out of 428 members voting, and the Senate agreed to rubber-stamp and bounce the text straight to the White House, without a hand-count vote, as soon as it arrives from the lower chamber. Trump has pledged not to veto the legislation, but Washington-watchers are not expecting imminent damning new revelations.The Justice Department has wide latitude to hold back information if its release “would jeopardize an active federal investigation.”Meanwhile Trump, in a widely criticized intervention last week, ordered officials to probe Epstein’s ties with high-profile Democrats.The saga has exposed rare fissures in support for the Republican leader, who previously campaigned on releasing the files but changed course after taking office, accusing Democrats of pushing a “hoax.”After multiple attempts by Republican leaders to block the vote, all Democrats and four Republicans signed a “discharge petition” — an extraordinary procedure forcing the bill to the House floor against the wishes of leadership.Relenting on his longstanding resistance, Trump said on social media late Sunday that Republicans should vote to release the files “because we have nothing to hide.””I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” Trump told reporters Tuesday at an Oval Office event with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. “I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert.”- Long association -However, Trump had a well documented relationship with Epstein, who was famous for throwing parties and other networking opportunities for the rich and powerful.The U-turn marks a rare occasion when a revolt from Trump’s allies has forced his hand, and Epstein survivors at a news conference ahead of the vote questioned the president’s motives.”I can’t help to be skeptical of what the agenda is,” said Haley Robson, who was recruited to massage Epstein when she was 16. “I am traumatized — I am not stupid.”At the time of his death, Epstein was facing federal trial over an alleged sex trafficking operation said to have exploited underage girls and young women, following a 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution.For years, Trump’s right-wing movement encouraged followers to believe that the government was covering up a major conspiracy.But Trump’s Justice Department said in July officials had completed an “exhaustive review” of the case and had “no basis to revisit the disclosure” of any Epstein materials.The White House escalated efforts last week to mothball the vote, with Trump and his allies making last-minute appeals to two of Republican signers of the discharge petition.This caused an uproar in Trump’s base.The rupture widened when Trump pulled his endorsement of top loyalist Marjorie Taylor Greene in a stunning break that she said “has all come down to the Epstein files.””The real test will be, will the Department of Justice release the files? Or will it all remain tied up in investigations?” she said at the news conference.

What are the ‘Epstein Files?’

The “Epstein Files,” sealed for years and the object of frenzied speculation, are one step closer to being released to the public.The US House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to order the release of government files related to the investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.The wealthy and well-connected financier died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking underage girls.But his death did nothing to staunch the furor over his connections with high-profile business executives, celebrities and politicians, including former close friend President Donald Trump.So what exactly are the Epstein Files?- Epstein Files -The Epstein Files refer to the reams of evidence amassed by the Justice Department and FBI during a probe in Florida that led to his 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution and the investigation that led to his later indictment in New York.Only a sliver of the government material has ever been released publicly, and a slew of revelations about Epstein in recent days comes from email traffic surrendered by his estate.The Epstein Files Transparency Act passed by the House calls for the release within 30 days of “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” in the possession of the Justice Department, the FBI and US attorneys’ offices related to Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting underage girls for Epstein.She was the only person convicted in connection with the disgraced financier, but Trump’s MAGA supporters have held as an article of faith for years that “deep state” elites were protecting Epstein associates in the Democratic Party and Hollywood.- The FBI/DOJ memo -The FBI and Justice Department triggered a political furor in July with the release of a memo stating that after an “exhaustive review” there would be no further disclosures of evidence from the investigative files on Epstein.The FBI/DOJ memo said there was “no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions” or had a “client list.”Epstein personally “harmed over one thousand victims,” the FBI and DOJ said, but “we did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”Digital searches of Epstein’s electronic devices and physical searches of his various properties, which included a private Caribbean island, had yielded a “significant amount of material, including more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence,” the memo said.- Trump and Epstein -Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to release the Epstein files and could have done so at any time since taking office without congressional intervention.But Trump changed his mind about releasing the files after entering the White House in January and only backed their disclosure this week after it became clear that Congress was going to vote for their release.Before reversing course, the Republican president ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to open an investigation into connections between Epstein and leading Democrats, including former president Bill Clinton.Clinton, like Trump, was once close to Epstein but neither man has been accused of any wrongdoing.Bondi immediately assigned the task to a prosecutor in New York and the move could potentially complicate the release of some of the material in the files or cause it to be heavily redacted.The House bill allows the withholding of material that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.”

Cloudflare bug takes chunk of web offline

Major websites including social network X and AI chatbot ChatGPT were disrupted on Tuesday after US online services provider Cloudflare said it had been affected by a “latent bug”.Web monitor Downdetector recorded disruptions for users of X, video game “League of Legends” and some services from Google and OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT.Cloudflare, which specialises in online security and says it manages some 20 percent of global internet traffic, saw its share price slump 1.5 percent in early trading. “Earlier today we failed our customers and the broader internet when a problem in Cloudflare network impacted large amounts of traffic that rely on us,” chief technology officer Dane Knecht wrote on X, adding that the problem had since been resolved.”In short, a latent bug in a service underpinning our bot mitigation capability started to crash after a routine configuration change we made.”The company said earlier there had been “a spike in unusual traffic” to one of its services.The outage was reminiscent of those that hit Amazon (AWS) and Microsoft cloud services last month, disrupting some online services for video games, businesses and transport firms.”This incident, as with the recent outage at AWS, shows how reliant some very important internet-based services are on a relatively few major players,” said Alan Woodward, professor of cybersecurity at the University of Surrey in England.”It’s a double-edged sword as these service providers need to be large to provide the scale and global reach required by big brands. But when they fail the impact can be significant.”The CloudFlare outage is the latest in a trend of infrastructure providers going offline and taking swaths of the internet with them, according to Emarketer analyst Jacob Bourne.While Cloudflare carries about a fifth of global internet traffic, it touches a third of the world’s top websites – powering retailers like Shopify and AI providers like OpenAI and Anthropic, as well as smartphone apps and streaming services, the analyst noted.”We’re seeing outages happen more frequently, and they’re taking longer to fix,” Bourne said.”That’s a symptom of strained infrastructure: increased AI load, streaming demand, and aging capacity all pushing systems past the edge.”The latest outage spotlights the importance of seemingly mundane internet infrastructure to the “AI Revolution”, according to Cornell University Tech Policy Institute director Sarah Kreps.”The issue exposes the reality that this multi-billion, even trillion dollar investment in AI is only as reliable as its least scrutinized third party infrastructure,” Kreps said.Knecht put out word on X that by day’s end Cloudflare will share details of what went wrong along with what the company plans to do to make sure it doesn’t happen again.