AFP USA

The leaders of the three core US immigration agencies will testify before the Senate’s powerful Homeland Security Committee in two weeks, it said Tuesday, as federal operations in Minneapolis and beyond face intense scrutiny after two fatal shootings.The February 12 hearing has been scheduled amid mounting criticism of a surge in enforcement actions ordered by President Donald Trump that have sparked deadly encounters between federal agents and civilians in the largest city of the northern state of Minnesota.Republican Rand Paul, the chairman of the Senate panel, posted on social media that the heads of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had agreed to appear. Paul underscored what he described as Congress’s duty to examine the scope and use of the significant taxpayer funding devoted to immigration enforcement.In a sharply worded message to agency leadership, Paul stressed the importance of reviewing what he described as the “exceptional amount of funding” the Republican-led Congress has provided for border security and immigration enforcement.”Congress has an obligation to conduct oversight of those tax dollars and ensure the funding is used to accomplish the mission, provide proper support for our law enforcement, and, most importantly, protect the American people,” he wrote.The letters were addressed to CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, ICE acting Director Todd Lyons and USCIS Director Joseph Edlow.The announcement of the hearing came with the Midwestern city of Minneapolis becoming a flashpoint in the national immigration debate. Earlier this month, federal agents shot and killed unarmed Renee Good, a 37-year-old Minneapolis woman, as she attempted to drive away from an ICE enforcement operation, triggering protests and criticism from civil rights groups and local officials. On Saturday, another Minneapolis resident, intensive care nurse Alex Pretti, also 37, was beaten and shot dead by CBP agents as he tried to help a woman that one of them had just shoved to the ground. Both killings have drawn international attention and condemnation over the government’s egregiously false accounts of what happened, intensifying public concern about the conduct and oversight of federal immigration operations.Paul questioned the decision by lawmakers to propose an additional $10 billion for ICE operations in 2026, noting that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by Trump last July, already earmarked more than $75 billion for ICE over the next four years.”In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding,” Paul posted on X.”So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.”

A judge in Los Angeles has reinstated a lawsuit against shock rocker Marilyn Manson under a new law enabling old sexual assault cases to be heard in court.The lawsuit, filed in May 2021 by a former assistant to the musician, had been dismissed in December because it exceeded the statute of limitations, a maximum time period for initiating legal proceedings after the related events took place. But plaintiff Ashley Walters asked the court to reconsider her case in January, when a new law mandated a two-year window for the consideration of sexual assault cases that had already expired under the statute. The lawsuit was accepted by the same Los Angeles Superior Court judge who had dismissed it the month before. “I looked at this closely,” Judge Steve Cochran said at a hearing on Monday, according to media reports. “I do think the statute revives the claim.” Walters alleges that the rocker sexually assaulted her when she worked for his Manson Records between 2010-2011.She also claims that Manson, whose real name is Brian Hugh Warner, boasted about raping women and even showed her a video in which he was abusing a minor girl.Manson’s lawyer Howard King said the lawsuit would fail.”While Ms. Walters made several now-irrelevant claims about so-called workplace harassment, she has no pending claims for sexual assault as defined in the penal code, as would be required under the new law, nor is she permitted under the ruling to add new claims,” King said in a statement sent to AFP on Tuesday.”The undeniable fact is that Mr. Warner never committed any sexual assault,” he added.Several women have accused Manson, 57, of sexual abuse and assault over the years, including actresses Esme Bianco (“Game of Thrones”) and his former partner Evan Rachel Wood.One of those cases, alleging sexual assault and domestic violence, was dismissed in January 2025, again because it fell outside of the statute of limitations.

US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that people “can’t walk in with guns” at protests after a second American was killed by federal authorities in Minnesota, aligning himself with an administration stance that has already drawn backlash from gun rights advocates.The comments came after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse who was legally carrying a handgun when he was wrestled to the ground, disarmed and killed by border agents during a protest in Minneapolis on Saturday. Pretti’s death has left Trump navigating a treacherous political terrain, caught between defending aggressive federal law enforcement tactics and risking a rupture with a gun lobby that has long been one of his most dependable allies.”You can’t have guns, you can’t walk in with guns, you can’t do that, but it’s a very unfortunate incident,” Trump told reporters when asked about Pretti’s death, which came days after an immigration agent killed unarmed activist Renee Good as she was attempting to drive away.The Republican leader’s stance has put him at odds with influential conservative gun groups, which argue that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry firearms while exercising other constitutional rights, including peaceful assembly.Gun rights advocates reacted angrily after senior officials appeared to suggest that Pretti’s lawful possession of a gun justified the agents’ actions. The National Rifle Association said such claims were “dangerous and wrong,” urging public figures to await the outcome of an investigation rather than “demonizing law-abiding citizens.” Gun Owners of America said Americans do not surrender their right to bear arms when they protest.Trump’s remarks also exposed tensions within his own political coalition. The president softened the administration’s tone compared with some aides, rejecting the “assassin” label used baselessly by deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller to describe Pretti.But he did not retreat from the broader argument that armed protesters create an inherent threat to law enforcement. That position has drawn criticism from libertarian-leaning Republicans, including Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie, who said that “carrying a firearm is not a death sentence.”And the debate risks reviving accusations of hypocrisy from Trump’s critics. The congressional panel investigating the 2021 riot at the US Capitol by Trump’s supporters heard testimony from a senior White House aide that Trump knew some supporters at his rally were armed but demanded security checks be removed to allow them closer — before urging the crowd to march on Congress.The contrast has sharpened Democratic attacks and unsettled parts of Trump’s base, particularly after the administration previously defended armed conservatives such as Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted after killing two people with his AR-15 semi-automatic rifle at a 2020 protest.

US President Donald Trump headed to Iowa Tuesday eager to show voters he cares about affordability — but his trip was overshadowed by anger over the deadly immigration crackdown in the neighboring state of Minnesota.Trump’s visit to the Republican-leaning state — famed as one of the first stops for primary campaigns in US presidential elections — is part of what the White House says will be weekly trips across the country.”I’m going to Iowa and what can I say — the economy’s good, it’s all good, prices are coming way down and we have a lot of positive news,” Trump told reporters as he left the White House.His spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Trump would be visiting a local business before giving a speech on “affordability and on the economy.””And I know he very much looks forward to being there, to meeting with the great people of Iowa, but also lawmakers as well,” Leavitt said Monday.White House officials said the speech would also touch on energy, prices of which Trump says are falling.But the 79-year-old president’s attempts to talk up the economy risk being obscured by fallout over the killing of a second protester in Minneapolis this month.Most of the questions Trump faced as he headed for his helicopter concerned the shooting of nurse Alex Pretti by a federal agent just over three hours drive away from the venue of his Iowa speech.Accompanying Trump to Iowa was was deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the architect of his immigration policy, who described Pretti without evidence as a “would-be assassin.” – ‘Very sad’ -But Trump has sought to pivot amid the growing backlash, taking a more conciliatory tone, reaching out to the Democratic governor of Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, and sending his border czar to the city.He called the shooting a “very sad situation” on Tuesday and refused to back Miller’s “assassin” description — while insisting that under-fire Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem would not step down.The political row over immigration, one of Trump’s core campaign issues, adds to the woes of a president already suffering in the polls on other subjects.The economy is a particular trouble spot for the billionaire property developer.Trump has promised Americans a new “golden age” fueled by tariffs on other countries, but until late last year he dismissed growing voter concerns over what he called the affordability “hoax.”He faced a fresh blow Tuesday as data showed US consumer confidence plunged in January to its lowest level since 2014.In recent weeks, however, the White House has moved to tackle what was rapidly becoming a weak spot for Republicans ahead of November’s crucial midterm elections.Trump will start making weekly pre-midterm trips to sell his agenda around the country while cabinet members will also increase domestic travel, his chief of staff Susie Wiles said last week.Yet many of Trump’s campaign-style speeches have rapidly veered into diatribes about subjects like immigration, and he faces accusations from Democrats of being out of touch on the economy.

President Donald Trump’s “border czar” arrived in Minneapolis on Tuesday as the US president struggled with damage control after the fatal shootings of two civilians fueled a storm of criticism over his signature immigration crackdown.Some federal agents — including Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol commander famed for reveling in aggressive, televised immigration crackdowns — were expected to leave Minneapolis.Trump said that Tom Homan — the top US border security official, who brings a less confrontational communication style — was meeting with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Tuesday”I hear things are going very nicely,” Trump said.The US president told reporters that he rejected the “assassin” label used by a top aide to describe 37-year-old protester Alex Pretti, who was shot at point-blank range over the weekend.But Trump also said people could not go to protests with guns — a reference to Pretti carrying a licensed firearm that was taken off him before he was shot. He also said that Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem would remain in her job despite the growing backlash over the shooting.- Betrayal of ‘basic values’ -Pretti’s death has sparked outrage nationwide, even among some of Trump’s usually ultra-loyal Republican allies in Congress.Former Democratic president Joe Biden on Tuesday said the situation “betrays our most basic values as Americans.” Former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have also spoken out.Pretti, shot multiple times after being knocked to the ground, was the second US citizen killed by immigration officers in Minneapolis this month, turning the city into ground zero of national tensions over Trump’s mass deportation policies.Protester Renee Good, a mother of three, was shot by an agent at point blank range in her car on January 7.The killings capped months of escalating violence in which masked, unidentified, and heavily armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents have grabbed people suspected of violating immigration laws off the streets.The roving units are the spearhead for Trump’s vow to deport hundreds of thousands of people who are in the country illegally. But while the policy was initially popular, the chaotic and violent implementation is causing uproar.Despite multiple videos clearly showing that Pretti posed no threat, top officials initially claimed he had been intending to kill federal agents and described him as a “domestic terrorist.” Trump himself amplified the conspiracy theory on social media before retreating with a more conciliatory message.Concern over the violence and the attempt to blame Pretti for his death quickly spread to Washington.Republican Senator Rand Paul said Tuesday that agents involved in the Pretti shooting should be put “immediately” on administrative leave. Centrist Democratic Senator John Fetterman — who rarely criticizes Trump — said “grossly incompetent” Noem should be fired.- Protestors feel vindicated -The turmoil could even result in suspension of wide swaths of US government funding with Democrats threatening to block approval of routine spending bills up for votes in the Senate later this week.At a demonstration in Minneapolis on Monday, locals expressed relief that ICE was expected to scale back.”It’s a vindication to some degree. We have a lot of fear around what kind of violence and reprisals might come as they leave,” protester Kyle Wagner told AFP.”Our neighborhoods and communities have been brutalized by them, so any decrease in the numbers and the severity is just a huge relief to the community that’s been suffering for months now.”Jasmine Nelson, who was also at the demonstration, said she was inspired by locals coming together to protest the killings.”It’s really beautiful to see everyone get together like this and fight against these injustices,” she said.

US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem would remain in her job, despite a backlash over a fatal shooting by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis.”No,” Trump told reporters at the White House when asked if Noem would step down after 37-year-old nurse Alex Pretti was killed while protesting against immigration raids.”I think she’s doing a very good job,” added Trump, in his first on-camera comments since the shooting on Saturday.The New York Times reported that Trump held an almost two-hour meeting Monday evening with Noem, who has favored aggressive immigration raids and described Pretti as a “domestic terrorist.”The Republican president has also dispatched his border czar Tom Homan to Minneapolis, in a sign he may favor Homan’s more targeted approach to the arrests of undocumented migrants over Noem’s showy mass raids.Trump, who was heading to Iowa to give a speech on the economy and affordability, continued his pivot from the White House’s aggressive initial reaction to the shooting.”I love his family and it’s a very sad situation,” Trump said.”We’re doing a big investigation… I’m going to be watching over it and I want to very honorable and honest investigation and I have to see it myself.”Trump also further distanced himself from the comments by Noem, and by deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who called Pretti an “assassin” who wanted to murder federal agents.The Trump administration says Pretti had a firearm with him, but video footage showed he was not holding it at any point in the confrontation, and that an agent had removed it before Pretti was shot.”No,” Trump replied, when asked if he agreed with Miller’s comments.”That being said, you can’t have guns, you can’t walk in with guns, you can’t do that.” Trump’s comments look set to further inflame a debate about gun rights in the United States sparked by Pretti’s death.His administration and law enforcement agencies under him have justified the fatal shooting on the grounds that Pretti had a handgun and accused him of acting violently when he became entangled with agents.Some gun rights advocates — often staunch supporters of the president — have raised concerns over the Trump administration’s comments about Pretti.The Second Amendment to the US Constitution stipulates that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” For decades, it has been the subject of intense controversy.

The banking industry is pushing back against White House-aligned crypto companies seeking to expand their business to Main Street customers in the United States.At the heart of the battle being waged by some of Washington’s most powerful lobbies is control over several trillions of dollars in banking deposits and a debate over whether crypto companies can offer an alternative place to stash cash.The crypto industry has long had a complicated and adversarial relationship with traditional banks, a distrust dating back to the birth of the crypto movement in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Crypto believers fear that banks are trying to derail their rise.The current battle centers on draft legislation — the Clarity Act — that would allow crypto players to offer cash rewards to stablecoin holders, boosting their ability to lure customers away from traditional banks.According to the American Banking Association, these incentives would endanger the $6.6 trillion in deposits parked in traditional banks, especially lenders smaller than the national giants JPMorgan Chase or Bank of America.These deposits are the lifeblood of the economy, especially in areas outside major cities, where local banks use them to finance loans to individuals, small businesses and farmers.”Community banks make 60 percent of all the small business loans in this country,” Independent Community Bankers of America CEO Rebeca Romero Rainey told AFP. “They make 80 percent of all agriculture loans. If they don’t have those deposits, where are the funds coming from to fund those loans?”Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain steady value by being pegged to traditional assets like cash or US government bonds — meaning they can be used reliably for transactions and transfers while bypassing banks.The crypto industry touts them as proof that crypto businesses can be trusted and aren’t necessarily high-risk or vulnerable to scams.For Bhau Kotecha, CEO and co-founder of platform Paxos Labs, banning stablecoins from offering interest “would narrow the use cases that make stablecoins compelling for mainstream adoption.”The key player in the battle is Coinbase and its CEO Brian Armstrong, who has led efforts to rehabilitate crypto’s reputation after years of scandals and a Biden administration notably skeptical of crypto’s benefits.In the runup to the 2024 election, Armstrong and Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz helped raise tens of millions of dollars for the Trump campaign and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to change Washington’s stance on crypto.The gamble paid off with the Republican sweep in November 2024.Since Donald Trump’s victory, crypto companies have seen their power and influence surge. Trump and his wife Melania each have their crypto coins, and his sons are heavily invested in the industry. One bill — the GENIUS Act — has already been signed into law, giving stablecoins long-sought legal recognition.But with the Clarity Act — a broader proposal setting the rules of the road for digital assets — the crypto industry is moving onto the banking industry’s turf.- Beware of the midterms -For banks, the risk of customers diverting deposits to stablecoins and potentially gutting their core business was too grave a threat.After their concerns were heard, the Senate Banking Committee was poised last month to pass a version of the bill that would ban stablecoins from paying interest.An irate Armstrong maneuvered to have the bill pulled, and the Clarity Act is now stuck in limbo.”We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” Armstrong wrote on X.The banks counter that if the crypto industry wants to operate as banks, they should apply for banking licenses and be regulated like any other lender.The White House remains confident the bill can get back on track, and warns of the consequences if the opportunity is missed and the Democratic party wins midterm elections in November.”You might not love every part of the CLARITY Act, but I can guarantee you’ll hate a future Dem version even more,” said Patrick Witt, who coordinates crypto policy at the White House.

Video sharing app TikTok has made an eleventh-hour deal to avoid a landmark US trial accusing it, along with Meta and YouTube, of addicting young people to social media, lawyers said on Tuesday.The deal was made as jury selection was to begin in a Los Angeles court that could establish a legal precedent on whether social media companies deliberately designed their platforms to addict children.The case being heard in the California state court is being called a “bellwether” proceeding because its outcome could set the tone for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States.The remaining defendants in the suit are Alphabet and Meta, the tech titans behind YouTube and Instagram.Meta co-founder and Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg is slated to be called as a witness during the trial.”The parties are pleased to have reached an amicable resolution of this dispute,” the Social Media Victims Law Center said, noting that the terms of the settlement with TikTok are confidential.The case focuses on allegations that a 19-year-old woman identified by the initials K.G.M. suffered severe mental harm because she was addicted to social media.After joining YouTube at age six, Instagram at 11, Snapchat at 13, and TikTok at 14, the Californian claims to have developed an addiction to the sites that contributed to her depression, anxiety, body image issues and that stoked suicidal thoughts.Social media firms are accused in hundreds of lawsuits of addicting young users to content that has led to depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalization and even suicide.Lawyers for the plaintiffs are explicitly borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies sold a harmful product.The trial before Judge Carolyn Kuhl is expected to start next week after a jury is selected.- ‘Significant victory’ -“This is the first time that a social media company has ever had to face a jury for harming kids,” Social Media Victims Law Center founder Matthew Bergman, whose team is involved in more than 1,000 such cases, told AFP.The center is a legal organization dedicated to holding social media companies accountable for harms allegedly caused to young people online.”The fact that now K.G.M. and her family get to stand in a courtroom equal to the largest, most powerful and wealthy companies in the world is, in and of itself, a very significant victory,” Bergman said.Internet titans have argued that they are shielded by Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which frees them of responsibility for what social media users post.However, this case argues those firms are culpable for business models designed to hold people’s attention and to promote content that winds up harming their mental health.”The allegations in these complaints are simply not true,” said Jose Castaneda, a YouTube spokesperson.”Providing young people with a safer, healthier experience has always been core to our work,” he added.Meta has also rejected the allegations.TikTok’s settlement joins Snapchat, which last week confirmed that it made a deal to avoid the trial brought by K.G.M. The terms were not disclosed.The companies face two other similar trials in the same court scheduled for later this year.Lawsuits, including some brought by school districts, accusing social media platforms of practices endangering young users are also making their way through federal court in Northern California and state courts across the country.

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed last year in a US military strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs filed a wrongful death lawsuit on Tuesday against the US government.It is the first such case to be brought against the Trump administration over the three dozen missile strikes in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, which have left at least 125 people dead since September.The suit, filed in a federal court in Massachusetts, is being brought by the families of Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who were among six people killed in an October 14 strike in the Caribbean.President Donald Trump alleged at the time that “six male narcoterrorists” were killed in a boat allegedly ferrying drugs from Venezuela to the United States.Washington has yet to release any evidence supporting its claims that the targeted boats have links to drug cartels designated by Trump as terrorist organizations.”The United States’ unlawful killings of persons at sea including Mr Joseph and Mr Samaroo constitute wrongful deaths and extrajudicial killings,” the complaint says. “These premeditated and intentional killings lack any plausible legal justification.”Thus, they were simply murders, ordered by individuals at the highest levels of government and obeyed by military officers in the chain of command.”The case is being brought under the Death on the High Seas Act, which allows for redress for wrongful deaths at sea, and the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreigners to file suit in US courts for rights violations.Plaintiffs in the case are Lenore Burnley, Joseph’s mother, and Sallycar Korasingh, Samaroo’s sister, and they are being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR).The family members are seeking punitive damages, the amount of which would be determined at trial.”These are lawless killings in cold blood; killings for sport and killings for theater,” CCR legal director Baher Azmy said.The suit is “a critical step in ensuring accountability, while the individuals responsible may ultimately be answerable criminally for murder and war crimes,” Azmy added.- ‘Must be held accountable’ -In a statement, Korasingh said her brother, who had spent 15 years in prison for participation in a homicide, “was a hardworking man who paid his debt to society and was just trying to get back on his feet again.””If the US government believed Rishi had done anything wrong, it should have arrested, charged, and detained him, not murdered him,” she said.According to the complaint, neither man was affiliated with drug cartels and they were simply hitching a ride back to Trinidad from Venezuela, where they had been engaged in fishing and farm work.In December, the family of a Colombian man killed in another strike lodged a complaint with the Washington-based Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).The family of Alejandro Carranza Medina, 42, who was killed on September 15, rejected assertions there were drugs on his vessel and said he was a fisherman doing his job on the open sea.The complaint accuses the United States of violating Carranza’s right to life and to due process.The IACHR is a quasi-judicial body of the Organization of American States, created to promote and protect human rights in the region.

The “Doomsday Clock” representing how near humanity is to catastrophe on Tuesday moved closer than ever to midnight as concerns mount on nuclear weapons, climate change and disinformation.The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which set up the metaphorical clock at the start of the Cold War, moved its time to 85 seconds to midnight — four seconds closer than a year ago.The announcement comes a year into President Donald Trump’s second term, in which he has shattered norms — ordering unilateral attacks abroad, deploying force at home in defiance of local authorities and withdrawing from a slew of international organizations.Russia, China, the United States and other major countries have “become increasingly aggressive, adversarial and nationalistic,” said a statement announcing the clock shift, determined after consultations with a board that includes eight Nobel laureates.”Hard-won global understandings are collapsing, accelerating a winner-takes-all great power competition and undermining the international cooperation critical to reducing the risks of nuclear war, climate change, the misuse of biotechnology, the potential threat of artificial intelligence and other apocalyptic dangers.”The Doomsday Clock board warned of heightened risks of a nuclear arms race, with the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia set to expire next week.”For the first time in over half a century, there will be nothing preventing a runaway nuclear arms race,” Daniel Holz, a University of Chicago physicist who chairs the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board, told a virtual news conference.Trump has threatened to resume nuclear testing and is pushing a costly “Golden Dome” missile defense system that would further militarize space.- Minnesota approach spells conflict -The board members also voiced alarm over Trump’s crackdown in Minnesota, where he has deployed a phalanx of masked, armed anti-immigration agents who have aggressively repressed protesters and shot dead two people.”History has shown that when governments become unaccountable to their own citizens, conflict and misery follow,” Holz said.The board also noted record emission levels of carbon dioxide, the key driver of the planet’s warming temperatures, as Trump sharply reverses US policy on fighting climate change and a number of other countries have backtracked in turn.Underpinning the threats, board members warned of a dangerous fracturing of global trust.”We are living through an information Armageddon — the crisis beneath all crises — driven by extractive and predatory technology that spreads lies faster than facts and profits from our division,” said Maria Ressa, the Filipina investigative journalist and Nobel Peace Prize winner who faced intense pressure from iron-fisted former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte, now awaiting trial at the International Criminal Court.Ressa pointed to Trump’s use of force in Minnesota and threats to seize Greenland as examples of losing “the battle for information integrity” with memes turning into reality.”The men who control the platforms that shape what billions believe have merged with the men who control governments and militaries,” she said. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, founded by Albert Einstein, Robert Oppenheimer and other nuclear scientists at the University of Chicago, initially placed the clock at seven minutes to midnight in 1947.It was moved closer last year but by only one second, amid guarded hopes on newly reinaugurated Trump’s promises to pursue peace and cooperation.”The problem is that rhetoric has not matched actions at all,” said Alexandra Bell, president and CEO of the Bulletin.