AFP Asia Business

Nvidia says it will resume sales of ‘H20’ AI chips to China

US tech giant Nvidia announced Tuesday it will resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing restrictions that had halted exports.The California-based company produces some of the world’s most advanced semiconductors but cannot ship its most cutting-edge chips to China due to concerns that Beijing could use …

Nvidia says it will resume sales of ‘H20’ AI chips to China Read More »

Divided EU leaves action against Israel on Gaza ‘on table’

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas on Tuesday said the bloc was leaving the door open to action against Israel over the war in Gaza if the humanitarian situation does not improve.Kallas has put forward 10 potential options after Israel was found to have breached a cooperation deal between the two sides on human rights grounds.The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel.Despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and there was no critical mass for taking any of the moves at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.”We will keep these options on the table and stand ready to act if Israel does not live up to its pledges,” Kallas told journalists.”The aim is not to punish Israel. The aim is to really improve the situation in Gaza.”That comes after Kallas on Thursday announced a deal with Israel to open more entry points and allow in more food.Gaza’s two million residents face dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its war with Palestinian militant group Hamas.”We see some positive signs when it comes to opening border crossings, we see some positive signs of them reconstructing the electricity lines, providing water, also more trucks of humanitarian aid coming in,” Kallas said Monday.But she said the situation in Gaza remained “catastrophic”. “Of course, we need to see more in order to see real improvement for the people on the ground,” she said. – ‘Use our leverage’ -Irish minister Thomas Byrne, whose country has been one of the toughest in the EU on Israel, said Kallas had committed to updating member states every two weeks on the progress of humanitarian access to Gaza.”So far, we haven’t really seen the implementation of it, maybe some very small actions, but there’s still slaughter going on,” he said.”So we need to see action and we need to use our leverage.”While the EU appears unable to take further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step.The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched military operations in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March.Until then, deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favourable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move.But the splits within the bloc mean that it has struggled to have a major impact on the war in Gaza and Israel’s foreign minister Gideon Saar had predicted confidently that the bloc wouldn’t take any further action on Monday.The war in Gaza was sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.Of 251 people taken hostage by Hamas, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.Hamas-run Gaza’s health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel’s retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable.Israel and Hamas have been in indirect talks for two weeks over a new ceasefire deal, but talks appear to be deadlocked. 

Thousands of Afghans win UK asylum after huge data breach

Thousands of Afghans who worked with the UK and their families were brought to Britain in a secret programme after a 2022 data breach put their lives at risk, the British government revealed on Tuesday.Defence Minister John Healey unveiled the scheme to parliament after the UK High Court on Tuesday lifted a super-gag order banning any reports of the events.In February 2022, a spreadsheet containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to Britain was accidentally leaked by a UK official just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, Healey said.”This was a serious departmental error,” Healey said, adding: “Lives may have been at stake.”The previous Conservative government put in place a secret programme in April 2024 to help those “judged to be at the highest risk of reprisals by the Taliban”, he said.Some 900 Afghans and 3,600 family members have now been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around £400 million ($535 million), Healey said. Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to £850 million.They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul.As Labour’s opposition defence spokesman, Healey was briefed on the scheme in December 2023 but the Conservative government asked a court to impose a “super-injunction” banning any mention of it in parliament or by the press.When Labour came to power in July 2024, the scheme was in full swing but Healey said he had been “deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting” to parliament. “Ministers decided not to tell parliamentarians at an earlier stage about the data incident, as the widespread publicity would increase the risk of the Taliban obtaining the dataset,” he explained.- ‘No retribution’ -Healey set up a review of the scheme when he became defence minister in the new Labour government. This concluded there was “very little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution”.The Afghan Response Route has now been closed, the minister said, apologising for the data breach which “should never have happened”. He estimated the total cost of relocating people from Afghanistan to Britain at between £5.5 billion to £6 billion.Conservative party defence spokesman James Cartlidge also apologised for the leak which happened under the previous Tory government. But he defended the decision to keep it secret, saying the aim had been to avoid “an error by an official of the British state leading to torture or even murder of persons in the dataset at the hands of what remains a brutal Taliban regime”.Healey said all those brought to the UK from Afghanistan had been accounted for in the country’s immigration figures. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to cut the number of migrants arriving in Britain.In 2023, the UK defence ministry was fined £350,000 by a data watchdog for disclosing personal information of 265 Afghans seeking to flee Taliban fighters in the chaotic fall of Kabul two years earlier.Britain’s Afghanistan evacuation plan was widely criticised, with the government accused by MPs of “systemic failures of leadership, planning and preparation”.Hundreds of Afghans eligible for relocation were left behind, many with their lives potentially at risk after details of staff and job applicants were left at the abandoned British embassy in Kabul.

West Bank Christian village prays for help after Israeli settler attacks

Clerics and diplomats walked as if in a religious procession through the streets of Taybeh, a small Christian village in the occupied West Bank where residents blame Israeli settlers for a spate of recent attacks.In cassocks and suits respectively, they answered the call from the local town hall and priests to meet residents affected by the violence and to see for themselves the arson damage on the remains of a Byzantine church.”It became every day more clear that there is no law. The only law is power,” said Jerusalem’s Latin Patriarch Pierbattista Pizzaballa.”Israeli authorities have a role to play in conducting the necessary investigations to find the perpetrators and charge them,” French Consul General in Jerusalem Nicolas Kassianides said.As he walked through the village on Monday, a resident thanked the French diplomat for his presence at the previous olive harvest — a common practice for Israeli activists and foreigners hoping their presence will deter settler attacks on Palestinians.The European Union’s representative in the Palestinian Territories, Alexandre Stutzmann, pointed to the sanctions imposed by the bloc on certain settlers and their organisations, and said attacks were “undermining the process for peace”.- ‘Daily provocations’ -The United Nations keeps a record of the routine violence committed by some of the nearly half a million Israeli settlers who live in the West Bank, excluding annexed east Jerusalem.Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are deemed illegal under international law.From July 1-7, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, OCHA, documented at least 27 settler attacks against Palestinians.In the villages and communities around Taybeh, Palestinian authorities reported that settlers had killed three people and damaged or destroyed multiple water sources in the past two weeks alone.The July 7 arson attack on the remains of the Church of Saint George, which date back to the 5th century, was the last straw for many villagers.”We struggle with daily provocations,” said Father Bashar Basiel as he described the damage done to village lands by the settlers’ livestock, or the aggressive visits by young hardliners.”How long will these attacks last?” he asked.On the sidelines of the visit, residents and officials exchanged photographs and videos of recent attacks and the damage done.Many questioned how the situation could have got so bad in a quiet village known more for its beer festival and picturesque alleyways than political activism or confrontations with the Israeli army.”We want peace,” local elders recited like a mantra from the sidelines of Monday’s procession.- Erasure -Yet few harbour hope that Monday’s visit will change the direction in which Taybeh seems headed.Daoud Khoury, Taybeh’s mayor for eight years, asked the foreign guests how they could combat settler violence “in concrete terms” and “protect Christians”.”In my opinion, the answer is that they can’t do much”, Khoury said later in the visit.He said he feared the worsening security situation would prompt more local families to emigrate abroad, severing the connection between Palestinians and their land.”What do people need? They need a roof over their head and they need a job,” said Khoury, who is now in his seventies. “That’s what I expected from the patriarchs. You know, trying to create jobs, trying to build houses.”Like most of Taybeh’s elderly residents, he has no plans to leave but feels powerless in the face of gradual settler expansion.”This is something that’s been going on for a while but right now it’s expanding… they’re just going everywhere, even closer, very close to the houses,” he said.Implicit is the fear that few residents dare to speak out loud — the potential disappearance of the village.From a corner of the local cemetery that was also damaged by a fire blamed on settlers, Qassam Muaddi pointed to the latest Israeli settlements on the horizon.The young journalist was irritated by the day’s formalities and said he felt like the situation had reached a deadend.”The message that we are getting (from the international community) is that we don’t matter… and that whether or not we still exist in the coming 50 years doesn’t change anything,” he said.

German court rejects Yemenis’ claim over US strikes

Germany’s highest court on Tuesday threw out a case brought by two Yemenis seeking to sue Berlin over the role of the US Ramstein airbase in a 2012 drone attack, ending a years-long legal saga.Plaintiffs Ahmed and Khalid bin Ali Jaber first brought their case to court in 2014 after losing members of their family in the strike on the village of Khashamir.The case has since been through several German courts. But the Constitutional Court on Tuesday ultimately ruled that Berlin is not required to take action against such attacks, which were not judged to be in breach of international law.Washington has for years launched drone strikes targeting suspected Al-Qaeda militants in Yemen, an impoverished country that has been torn by fierce fighting between its beleaguered Saudi-backed government and Iran-backed rebels.The two Yemeni men, supported by the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), had argued that Germany was partly responsible for the attack because the strike was aided by signals relayed via the Ramstein base in western Germany.”Without the data that flows through Ramstein, the US cannot fly its combat drones in Yemen,” the group said.The ECCHR’s Andreas Schueller argued that “the German government must put an end to the use of this base — otherwise the government is making itself complicit in the deaths of innocent civilians”. – ‘Complaint unfounded’ -The court found that Germany “does have a general duty to protect fundamental human rights and the core norms of international humanitarian law, even in cases involving foreign countries”. However, in order for this duty to be binding, there must be “a serious risk of systematic violation of applicable international law”.”Measured against these standards, the constitutional complaint is unfounded,” the court said.The ECCHR said the ruling had “failed to send a strong signal” and meant that “instead, individual legal protection remains a theoretical possibility without practical consequences”.However, Schueller said the verdict “leaves the door open for future cases”. “Violations of international law can be subject to judicial review, even if the court imposes high hurdles. This is an important statement by the Constitutional Court in these times,” he said.- ‘Margin of discretion’ -According to the ECCHR, the two Yemeni men were having dinner ahead of the wedding of a male family member in 2012 when they heard the buzz of a drone and then the boom of missile attacks that claimed multiple lives.Their case against Germany was initially thrown out, before the higher administrative court in Muenster ruled in their favour in 2019.However, the government appealed and a higher court overturned the decision in 2020, arguing that German diplomatic efforts were enough to ensure Washington was adhering to international law.In a statement shared by the ECCHR, the two men called the ruling “dangerous and disturbing”.”(It) suggests countries that provide assistance to the US assassination programme bear no responsibility when civilians are killed. Our hearts are broken, and our faith in international law is shaken,” they said.The German government welcomed the ruling, which it said showed that Berlin had “a wide margin of discretion in assessing whether the actions of third states comply with international law”.”According to the ruling, the government has no fundamental duty to protect foreigners abroad who are affected by military action by third states if, in the government’s assessment, these attacks are within the bounds of what is permissible under international law,” the defence and foreign ministries said in a statement.