AFP Asia Business

Israel PM: new security chief must be appointed ‘as soon as possible’

Israel’s premier said Friday his pick for the next domestic intelligence chief should be appointed “as soon as possible” but would have no hand in an ongoing investigation into his associates.Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to tap army Major General David Zini to lead the Shin Bet — following months of legal and political wrangling over his attempt to sack incumbent head Ronen Bar — has already sparked threats of a legal challenge.”It is imperative to name a permanent head of the Shin Bet as soon as possible,” a statement from Netanyahu’s office said.”It is a security requirement of the highest order, and any delay infringes on the security of the state as well as that of our soldiers.”The statement also noted the probe into alleged Qatari influence involving advisers to the premier, which Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara has suggested created a conflict of interest in Netanyahu’s attempt to fire Bar.Netanyahu’s office said that “to avoid any suspicion linked to the inquiries concerning Qatar, the prime minister clarifies that the appointed head of the Shin Bet will not be involved at all in these investigations”.It noted that the appointment still had to be approved by a vetting committee and the cabinet.The prime minister announced Zini’s selection on Thursday night, a day after the supreme court ruled the government’s decision to fire current security chief Bar was “improper and unlawful”.The announcement defied Baharav-Miara, who had said that given the court ruling, the premier “must refrain from any action related to the appointment of a new head of the Shin Bet”.- ‘Flawed’ process -Following the announcement, the attorney general said there was “serious concern that he (Netanyahu) acted while in a conflict of interest, and the appointment process is flawed”.Opposition leader Yair Lapid called on Zini not to accept the role “until the Supreme Court rules on the matter”, while the NGO Movement for Quality Government in Israel said it would file a legal petition “against this invalid appointment”.In March, Netanyahu said he was dismissing Bar because of an “ongoing lack of trust”.That move was challenged in court by non-profit organisations and Israel’s political opposition, which decried it as a sign of anti-democratic drift on the part of Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition government.Bar himself suggested that his ouster was linked to investigations into Hamas’s deadly October 7, 2023 attack on Israel “and other serious matters”.He has since said he will step down in June.In a brief statement, the Israeli military said on Friday that its top commander, Eyal Zamir, had “decided on MG David Zini’s retirement from military service in the upcoming days”, and thanked him for his “lengthy service”.The statement added that Zamir “reiterates that any discourse conducted by IDF soldiers with the political echelon must be approved by the Chief of General Staff!”The tone of the statement prompted speculation in Israeli media that Zini, once seen as a potential military chief himself, had been fired.Responding to the reports, the military emphasised that “Zini was not dismissed”, calling him an “appreciated and decorated officer”.

Iran, US to hold new round of nuclear talks in Rome

Iranian and US negotiators meet in Rome on Friday for a fifth round of nuclear talks, after a public disagreement over Tehran’s uranium enrichment.The talks, which began in April, are the highest-level contact between the foes since the United States quit a landmark 2015 nuclear accord during President Donald Trump’s first term.Since returning to office, Trump has revived his “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran, backing talks but warning of military action if diplomacy fails.Iran wants a new deal that would ease sanctions which have battered its economy.The last round of talks, in the Omani capital Muscat, ended with a public spat over enrichment.US envoy Steve Witkoff said Washington “could not authorise even one percent” enrichment — a position Tehran called a red line, citing its rights under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.- ‘Fundamental differences’ -Ahead of Friday’s talks, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said “fundamental differences” remained with the United States, while adding that Tehran was open to its nuclear sites undergoing more inspections.”We will not have an agreement at all” if the United States wants to prevent Iran from enriching uranium, Araghchi said.Iran’s official IRNA news agency reported that the talks in the Italian capital were scheduled to begin at 1:00 pm (1100 GMT).They come ahead of a June meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the October expiry of the 2015 accord.The deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aimed to allay Western suspicions that Iran was seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition that Tehran has consistently denied.In return for curbs on its nuclear programme, Iran had received relief from international sanctions. But the accord was torpedoed in 2018 when Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States and reimposed sanctions.A year later, Iran responded by ramping up its nuclear activities.It is now enriching uranium to 60 percent — far above the deal’s 3.67 percent cap but below the 90 percent level needed for a nuclear warhead.- ‘It’s quite simple’ -Analysts in Tehran said Iran was unlikely to back down.”It’s quite simple; if the US expects Iran to halt nuclear enrichment, then there can’t be a deal,” said Mohammad Marandi, a political scientist who was once an adviser on the nuclear issue.The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran says the country’s nuclear industry employs 17,000 people, similar to other countries where uranium is enriched for civilian use.”The Netherlands, Belgium, South Korea, Brazil and Japan enrich (uranium) without possessing nuclear weapons,” its spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said.Iran’s enmity with Israel, whose main backer is the United States, has been a constant backdrop to the talks.In a letter to the United Nations, Araghchi wrote: “We believe that in the event of any attack on the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Zionist regime, the US government will also be involved and bear legal responsibility.” The warning came after CNN, citing unnamed US officials, reported Israel was making preparations to carry out such a strike.The White House said Trump had a “productive discussion” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday about Iran and the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staff in Washington.- ‘Irreversible’ -Friday’s talks will be held before an IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna in June during which Iran’s nuclear activities will be reviewed.The 2015 deal provides for the possibility of UN sanctions being reimposed through a mechanism called “snapback” if Iran fails to fulfil its commitments.The agreement’s three European parties — Britain, France and Germany — have warned they will trigger the mechanism if the continent’s security is threatened.Iran’s top diplomat Araghchi said such a move would have “consequences — not only the end of Europe’s role in the agreement, but also an escalation of tensions that could become irreversible”.