The Bank of England is reviewing its rules that determine when international banks are required to set up a formal subsidiary after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank showed it was easier to seize control of such operations in the event a bank fails.
(Bloomberg) — The Bank of England is reviewing its rules that determine when international banks are required to set up a formal subsidiary after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank showed it was easier to seize control of such operations in the event a bank fails.
Silicon Valley Bank operated as a branch in the UK for a decade before regulators finally required it to subsidiarise, Sam Woods, chief executive officer of the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority, said in prepared remarks during the City Banquet at Mansion House. That’s left regulators worried that their existing criteria might not catch another bank branch that offers similar deposit and transactional services to small- and mid-sized UK companies.
“For that reason, we are thinking about our approach to branching,” he said. “This is not about fundamental reform, but about whether there are any targeted areas for improvement.”
Woods added that the vast majority of branch business would be unaffected.
The UK is home to more than 150 branches with about £6.3 trillion in assets. It’s typically more costly for international banks to set up separately capitalized subsidiaries rather than operating as a branch and Woods noted that offering the branch model is key to the UK remaining a financial center.
“They significantly reduce the barriers to international banking business, are important for competitiveness and part of the City’s lifeblood,” Woods said. “That is not going to change.”
In the wide-ranging speech, Woods also weighed in on the latest global reforms governing capital requirements known as Basel III because they’re tied to an international overhaul that started more than a decade ago in response to the financial crisis of 2008.
Top US regulators unveiled their plans for implementing the rules in July. The proposed changes would mean the eight largest US banks would have to increase capital by about 19%, leading executives from JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. to push back against the plans.
In contrast, Woods said he doesn’t expect the reforms in the UK “to move the dial in a meaningful way on aggregate capital levels.”
In other prepared remarks, Nikhil Rathi, chief executive officer of the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, said the regulator was starting to see more banks offering higher savings rates to consumers after the agency warned in July it would take “robust action” against firms that didn’t.
“We are starting to see improvements – better value products, communications and customer journeys, better deposit competition and faster pass through of rate rises,” Rathi said. “We are being proportionate, focusing on the most serious harms.”
Read more: Europe’s Banks Dangle 5% for Deposits in Fight for Clients
In a separate speech on Monday, Nicholas Lyons, the Lord Mayor of London and a veteran financier, encouraged government officials, regulators and the financial industry to consider developing a secondment program that would encourage collaboration between the three sides. Secondment programs typically allow a company to assign an employee to go work for another company temporarily as a way to improve relations and share knowledge.
Lyons also said regulators should encourage more pensions to invest in unlisted asset classes like infrastructure, real estate, private debt and private equity to help ensure the UK’s savers are getting better returns.
“With a renewed partnership between regulators, government and industry, we can unlock investment,” Lyons said.
(Updates with comment from Nikhil Rathi in 10th and eleventh paragraphs.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.