By Hyunsu Yim
SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol’s branding of critics as “communist totalitarian and anti-state forces” may rally his conservative base and distract from unease about some of his policies but risk fuelling division and alienating some voters.
In South Korea, the label of communist carries higher stakes than in many Western democracies with the ongoing threat from ostensibly communist North Korea and Cold War-era laws that effectively ban activities deemed related to communism.
Yoon’s remarks and the renewed public debate over communism come with his approval ratings slipping and political tensions rising ahead of a general election in April.
They also come at a time of a noticeable shift in Seoul’s foreign policy as Yoon pushes for trilateral cooperation with the U.S. and Japan despite lingering public unease with Tokyo over historical issues, said Kevin Gray, a professor at University of Sussex.
“There is a legitimacy problem for Yoon in the sense that the gap between popular opinion in South Korea and what is being pursued internationally is increasing,” Gray said.
“He has decided to take an approach not of trying to convince people but to label the opposition as being somehow an anti-state, communist totalitarian force.”
In a speech earlier this month, Yoon said South Korea’s freedom is “under constant threat” from “communist totalitarian and anti-state forces” who are critical of South Korea’s deepening ties with the U.S. and Japan.
“The forces of communist totalitarianism have disguised themselves as democracy activists, human rights advocates and progressive activists,” Yoon said in another speech for Liberation Day last month.
Yoon’s office told Reuters that the president had never branded domestic critics as “communist totalitarian” or “anti-state forces” but rather he was expressing concern about forces attempting to undermine freedom, democracy, and the constitutional values of South Korea.
The liberal opposition party, which controls the National Assembly but is in disarray amid corruption charges against its leader, has criticised Yoon as wasting his term on an “ideological war” that deepens political divides and does nothing to address real problems.
“The president keeps emphasizing the threat from communist forces which don’t exist,” a spokesperson for the Democratic Party said at a briefing last week.
SINKING APPROVAL RATINGS
Yoon’s disapproval ratings stood at 59%, according to a Gallup poll released on Friday, up from 37% when elected last year. Foreign policy, the government’s economic management and stance on Japan’s Fukushima wastewater release were the leading issues.
Given his low approval ratings, analysts say labelling his opponents as communists may still be useful for Yoon to hold onto his party’s conservative base.
Andrew Yeo, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the legacy of the Korean War and North Korean infiltration into the South means “red-baiting” is still effective in demonising opponents.
Earlier this year, four former officials at the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, the biggest umbrella union in the country, were charged over links to North Korean spies and violating the National Security Act.
“Unfortunately, such tactics only deepen political divides, contributing to nationalist polarisation,” Yeo said.
Benjamin Engel, a research professor at Seoul National University, said Yoon’s approach risks alienating some more moderate voters.
“During his campaign, Yoon often used the phrase ‘uniting the people.’ But his recent policies, rhetoric, and appointments suggest he is moving away from uniting the people. The result will be some people who may have voted for him last year now feel alienated,” Engel said.
THE ‘NEW RIGHT’ MOVEMENT
Yoon has aligned himself with the ‘New Right’ movement which offers a more “charitable” view of the country’s authoritarian past and its link to the Japanese colonial period, Yeo said.
Rhee Jong-hoon, a Seoul-based political commentator, sees Yoon’s more right wing approach as being influenced in part by his late father who studied in Japan and once took part in a signature campaign linked to the New Right movement.
“Yoon has perhaps always warmed to and sympathised with the figures who his father had hung out with and are associated with the New Right movement,” Rhee said.
The president’s office said any assumptions about his father’s politics are “baseless”, but Rhee argued that Yoon’s comments are likely more than just a political tactic.
“It would be difficult to imagine (Yoon’s moves) being driven without his own deeply rooted conviction,” Rhee said.
(Reporting by Hyunsu Yim; Editing by Josh Smith and Lincoln Feast)
