Emails and texts by Tucker Carlson, other Fox News hosts and executives were shown to the judge overseeing Dominion Voting Systems’s $1.6 billion defamation suit against the network for broadcasting 2020 election-fraud claims.
(Bloomberg) — Emails and texts by Tucker Carlson, other Fox News hosts and executives were shown to the judge overseeing Dominion Voting Systems’s $1.6 billion defamation suit against the network for broadcasting 2020 election-fraud claims.
Justin Nelson, one of the voting machine maker’s lawyers, on Tuesday projected several internal communications on a courtroom screen to argue before Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis that key players at Fox never believed the fraud allegations but sat on their hands while Sidney Powell and other allies of then-President Donald Trump went on air to accuse Dominion of conspiring with Democrats and foreign governments to rig the vote.
Powell’s claims are “obviously untrue” and “unbelievably offensive,” Carlson wrote in emails shown in court. “Our good people are going to believe them,” the host added.
“We have — in their own words — evidence they knew the theories were false and they just continued to recklessly ignore the truth” to pander to hard-right viewers, Nelson said
Tuesday’s hearing is for Davis to decide whether he should decide the case without the trial scheduled for April 17. The internal communications cited by Dominion have led some legal experts to suggest it could be the rare defamation case resulting in summary judgment against the defendant.
Newsworthy Issues
But Charles Elson, a lawyer and retired University of Delaware professor, said it was extremely unlikely that Davis would decide the case on summary judgment.
“This case has been going on for about two years and the judge has had lots of opportunities to make a case-decisive ruling,” Elson said in an interview. “The chances he’s going to take it away from a jury three weeks before trial are pretty slim.”
Fox’s legal team contends the network was simply reporting newsworthy issues tied to a story of national importance and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment. The network is also asking Davis for summary judgment, arguing that allowing a jury to decide the case would have a chilling effect on journalism in the future.
Davis, a 12-year veteran of the Delaware bench, has kept his cool as lawyers for both sides have ramped up the rhetoric in the politically charged case.
“He’s a rock-steady judge who calls cases as he sees them without any preconceived agendas or notions,” said Wilmington lawyer Sid Liebesman. “He maintains a level playing field in the courtroom without a hint of drama. This case won’t get to him one bit.”
Given the political overtones of Dominion’s defamation case, Davis will be closely scrutinized by political pundits from both sides of the aisle. He’s a registered Democrat, but that’s hardly unusual in a deep-blue state where the judges are appointed by the governor.
Davis last year rejected Fox’s bid to have Dominion’s case dismissed, concluding the company had advanced sufficient evidence to back up its claims that the network either knew the election-fraud allegations were false or recklessly disregarded the possibility.
Davis is no stranger to high-profile litigation. A former Delaware partner at top New York law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, he spent 10 years as a lawyer battling over bankruptcy and business-law disputes. He left Skadden for the Delaware bench in 2010, spending two years handling misdemeanor cases and traffic violations before moving to the Superior Court. He’s now part of the court’s five-member panel that oversees complex commercial litigation.
“He’s got the right kind of experience to handle those tougher cases,” said Tony Clark, an ex-Skadden partner who mentored Davis. “Eric is a very even-keeled person,” Clark added. “He’s not going to lose his temper on the bench and I think many people would describe him as very steady and solid.”
In a hearing earlier this month, the judge said he’d been getting questions about whether he will question potential jurors in the Dominion about their political leanings as part of the selection process.
“I don’t care who they voted for,” Davis said, according to a hearing transcript. “That’s not an issue in this case. The issue in this case is whether Fox Corp. and Fox News defamed Dominion and caused Dominion damages.”
Though the politics of the Dominion case has resulted in plenty of incendiary rhetoric, Davis has taken pains to keep that out of his courtroom. He apologized in February to lawyers for both sides for sending an email that could have construed as snarky, according to a hearing transcript.
“If I’m upset, I’ll let you know it. I won’t do it in a subtle, sarcastic way,” the judge said.
The case is Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News, N21C-03-257 EMD, Delaware Superior Court (Wilmington)
–With assistance from Erik Larson.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.